有氧能力、体力活动和体重指数在糖耐量受损和2型糖尿病中的相对重要性

Elisabeth Hansen, B. Landstad, K. T. Gundersen, S. Svebak
{"title":"有氧能力、体力活动和体重指数在糖耐量受损和2型糖尿病中的相对重要性","authors":"Elisabeth Hansen, B. Landstad, K. T. Gundersen, S. Svebak","doi":"10.3402/vgi.v3i0.10232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To investigate the relative importance of aerobic capacity, physical activity and body mass index (BMI) for discriminating between people with Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) or Type 2 diabetes and healthy controls. Methods Variables included scores on estimated VO2-max (ml/kg/min) by walking the UKK walking-test, responses to questions on self-reported physical activity and BMI. Design Participants were recruited into groups of IGT, Type 2 diabetes and healthy controls (N=64). Statistical analyses were performed by multifactor ANOVA, bivariate correlations and logistic regression. Results Obesity, as indicated by BMI, was most evident in the IGT and Type 2 diabetes groups when jointly compared with the healthy controls (p=0.004, OR ≥ 16.00). However, when separately compared with the healthy controls, BMI scores strongly discriminated between the IGT versus healthy controls but failed to distinguish between Type 2 diabetes and healthy controls. Scores for aerobic capacity and level of physical activity failed to distinguish between healthy controls and IGT as well as Type 2 diabetes status. Conclusion BMI was significantly associated with IGT whereas aerobic capacity and level of physical activity were not predictive of group status for IGT and Type 2 diabetes. The results indicated that primary health care should focus on all means for weight reduction, including physical activity and other life style changes, in order to prevent individuals from escalating into IGT in order to prevent risk of Type 2 diabetes.","PeriodicalId":356239,"journal":{"name":"Vulnerable Groups & Inclusion","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relative importance of aerobic capacity, physical activity and body mass index in impaired glucose tolerance and Type 2 diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Hansen, B. Landstad, K. T. Gundersen, S. Svebak\",\"doi\":\"10.3402/vgi.v3i0.10232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim To investigate the relative importance of aerobic capacity, physical activity and body mass index (BMI) for discriminating between people with Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) or Type 2 diabetes and healthy controls. Methods Variables included scores on estimated VO2-max (ml/kg/min) by walking the UKK walking-test, responses to questions on self-reported physical activity and BMI. Design Participants were recruited into groups of IGT, Type 2 diabetes and healthy controls (N=64). Statistical analyses were performed by multifactor ANOVA, bivariate correlations and logistic regression. Results Obesity, as indicated by BMI, was most evident in the IGT and Type 2 diabetes groups when jointly compared with the healthy controls (p=0.004, OR ≥ 16.00). However, when separately compared with the healthy controls, BMI scores strongly discriminated between the IGT versus healthy controls but failed to distinguish between Type 2 diabetes and healthy controls. Scores for aerobic capacity and level of physical activity failed to distinguish between healthy controls and IGT as well as Type 2 diabetes status. Conclusion BMI was significantly associated with IGT whereas aerobic capacity and level of physical activity were not predictive of group status for IGT and Type 2 diabetes. The results indicated that primary health care should focus on all means for weight reduction, including physical activity and other life style changes, in order to prevent individuals from escalating into IGT in order to prevent risk of Type 2 diabetes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vulnerable Groups & Inclusion\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vulnerable Groups & Inclusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3402/vgi.v3i0.10232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vulnerable Groups & Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/vgi.v3i0.10232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的探讨有氧能力、体力活动和体重指数(BMI)对区分糖耐量受损(IGT)或2型糖尿病患者与健康对照者的相对重要性。方法变量包括通过UKK步行测试估计的最大摄氧量(ml/kg/min)得分、自我报告体力活动问题的回答和BMI。设计将参与者分为IGT组、2型糖尿病组和健康对照组(N=64)。采用多因素方差分析、双变量相关分析和logistic回归进行统计分析。结果与健康对照组相比,IGT组和2型糖尿病组肥胖(BMI)最为明显(p=0.004, OR≥16.00)。然而,当与健康对照单独比较时,BMI分数在IGT和健康对照之间有很强的区别,但不能区分2型糖尿病和健康对照。有氧能力和体力活动水平的评分无法区分健康对照组和IGT以及2型糖尿病状态。结论BMI与IGT显著相关,而有氧能力和体力活动水平不能预测IGT和2型糖尿病的组状态。结果表明,初级卫生保健应关注所有减肥手段,包括身体活动和其他生活方式的改变,以防止个体升级为IGT,从而预防2型糖尿病的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relative importance of aerobic capacity, physical activity and body mass index in impaired glucose tolerance and Type 2 diabetes
Aim To investigate the relative importance of aerobic capacity, physical activity and body mass index (BMI) for discriminating between people with Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) or Type 2 diabetes and healthy controls. Methods Variables included scores on estimated VO2-max (ml/kg/min) by walking the UKK walking-test, responses to questions on self-reported physical activity and BMI. Design Participants were recruited into groups of IGT, Type 2 diabetes and healthy controls (N=64). Statistical analyses were performed by multifactor ANOVA, bivariate correlations and logistic regression. Results Obesity, as indicated by BMI, was most evident in the IGT and Type 2 diabetes groups when jointly compared with the healthy controls (p=0.004, OR ≥ 16.00). However, when separately compared with the healthy controls, BMI scores strongly discriminated between the IGT versus healthy controls but failed to distinguish between Type 2 diabetes and healthy controls. Scores for aerobic capacity and level of physical activity failed to distinguish between healthy controls and IGT as well as Type 2 diabetes status. Conclusion BMI was significantly associated with IGT whereas aerobic capacity and level of physical activity were not predictive of group status for IGT and Type 2 diabetes. The results indicated that primary health care should focus on all means for weight reduction, including physical activity and other life style changes, in order to prevent individuals from escalating into IGT in order to prevent risk of Type 2 diabetes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Daily newspaper reporting on elderly care in Sweden and Finland: a quantitative content analysis of ethnicity- and migration-related issues Informal and formal reconciliation strategies of older peoples' working carers: the European carers@work project Housing support workers as equilibrists between instrumentality and situation Gender as headline and subtext: problematizing the gender perspective in an occupational health project Capability to care and work: when dual roles intersect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1