使用F4SLE进行安全级别评估

M. Seeba, Tarmo Oja, M. Murumaa, Václav Stupka
{"title":"使用F4SLE进行安全级别评估","authors":"M. Seeba, Tarmo Oja, M. Murumaa, Václav Stupka","doi":"10.1145/3600160.3605045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the realm of security measurements, extensive efforts have been made to evaluate and compare security levels at the country level, resulting in various indices. However, there has been a dearth of evaluations focusing on the information security posture of individual organizations and simultaneously on state-level status evaluation. Such evaluations hold significant potential for providing valuable feedback on the security status of organizations and facilitating assessments and supportive data-driven focused interventions at a national level. This study leverages the Framework for Security Level Evaluation (F4SLE) and the developed tool, Measurement Application for Self-assessing Security (MASS), to collect data for the evaluation. The paper presents diverse options for interpreting the collected data and establishes the foundation for an ongoing cross-country study. The results encompass the analysis of organization-level data and offer insights into overall approaches to security across organizations. This study is a preliminary step toward a more comprehensive information security examination.","PeriodicalId":107145,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Security level evaluation with F4SLE\",\"authors\":\"M. Seeba, Tarmo Oja, M. Murumaa, Václav Stupka\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3600160.3605045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the realm of security measurements, extensive efforts have been made to evaluate and compare security levels at the country level, resulting in various indices. However, there has been a dearth of evaluations focusing on the information security posture of individual organizations and simultaneously on state-level status evaluation. Such evaluations hold significant potential for providing valuable feedback on the security status of organizations and facilitating assessments and supportive data-driven focused interventions at a national level. This study leverages the Framework for Security Level Evaluation (F4SLE) and the developed tool, Measurement Application for Self-assessing Security (MASS), to collect data for the evaluation. The paper presents diverse options for interpreting the collected data and establishes the foundation for an ongoing cross-country study. The results encompass the analysis of organization-level data and offer insights into overall approaches to security across organizations. This study is a preliminary step toward a more comprehensive information security examination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3605045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3605045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在安全措施方面,已作出广泛努力来评价和比较国家一级的安全水平,从而得出各种指数。然而,对单个组织的信息安全状态进行评估,同时对国家层面的状态进行评估的评估一直很缺乏。这种评价具有很大的潜力,可以就各组织的安全状况提供有价值的反馈,并在国家一级促进评估和支持数据驱动的重点干预措施。本研究利用安全水平评估框架(F4SLE)和开发的安全自我评估测量应用(MASS)工具来收集评估数据。本文提出了解释收集到的数据的多种选择,并为正在进行的跨国研究奠定了基础。结果包括对组织级数据的分析,并提供对跨组织安全的总体方法的见解。这项研究是迈向更全面的信息安全审查的初步步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Security level evaluation with F4SLE
In the realm of security measurements, extensive efforts have been made to evaluate and compare security levels at the country level, resulting in various indices. However, there has been a dearth of evaluations focusing on the information security posture of individual organizations and simultaneously on state-level status evaluation. Such evaluations hold significant potential for providing valuable feedback on the security status of organizations and facilitating assessments and supportive data-driven focused interventions at a national level. This study leverages the Framework for Security Level Evaluation (F4SLE) and the developed tool, Measurement Application for Self-assessing Security (MASS), to collect data for the evaluation. The paper presents diverse options for interpreting the collected data and establishes the foundation for an ongoing cross-country study. The results encompass the analysis of organization-level data and offer insights into overall approaches to security across organizations. This study is a preliminary step toward a more comprehensive information security examination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Confidential Quantum Computing Enabling Qualified Anonymity for Enhanced User Privacy in the Digital Era Fingerprint forgery training: Easy to learn, hard to perform Experiences with Secure Pipelines in Highly Regulated Environments Leveraging Knowledge Graphs For Classifying Incident Situations in ICT Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1