{"title":"面向用户的评价措施池化","authors":"G. Baruah, Adam Roegiest, Mark D. Smucker","doi":"10.1145/2808194.2809493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional TREC-style pooling methodology relies on using predicted relevance by systems to select documents for judgment. This coincides with typical search behaviour (e.g., web search). In the case of temporally ordered streams of documents, the order that users encounter documents is in this temporal order and not some predetermined rank order. We investigate a user oriented pooling methodology focusing on the documents that simulated users would likely read in such temporally ordered streams. Under this user model, many of the relevant documents found in the TREC 2013 Temporal Summarization Track's pooling effort would never be read. Not only does our pooling strategy focus on pooling documents that will be read by (simulated) users, the resultant pools are different from the standard TREC pools.","PeriodicalId":440325,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pooling for User-Oriented Evaluation Measures\",\"authors\":\"G. Baruah, Adam Roegiest, Mark D. Smucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2808194.2809493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional TREC-style pooling methodology relies on using predicted relevance by systems to select documents for judgment. This coincides with typical search behaviour (e.g., web search). In the case of temporally ordered streams of documents, the order that users encounter documents is in this temporal order and not some predetermined rank order. We investigate a user oriented pooling methodology focusing on the documents that simulated users would likely read in such temporally ordered streams. Under this user model, many of the relevant documents found in the TREC 2013 Temporal Summarization Track's pooling effort would never be read. Not only does our pooling strategy focus on pooling documents that will be read by (simulated) users, the resultant pools are different from the standard TREC pools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2808194.2809493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2808194.2809493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Traditional TREC-style pooling methodology relies on using predicted relevance by systems to select documents for judgment. This coincides with typical search behaviour (e.g., web search). In the case of temporally ordered streams of documents, the order that users encounter documents is in this temporal order and not some predetermined rank order. We investigate a user oriented pooling methodology focusing on the documents that simulated users would likely read in such temporally ordered streams. Under this user model, many of the relevant documents found in the TREC 2013 Temporal Summarization Track's pooling effort would never be read. Not only does our pooling strategy focus on pooling documents that will be read by (simulated) users, the resultant pools are different from the standard TREC pools.