通过州法院推翻消费者纠纷解决机构的判决

D. Manurung
{"title":"通过州法院推翻消费者纠纷解决机构的判决","authors":"D. Manurung","doi":"10.35334/ay.v3i2.1550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Litigation dispute resolution is the settlement of a dispute through a court which results in a win and lose decision. The decision gives the one party wins and the other party loses. Non-litigation dispute resolution is the settlement of a dispute outside the court where it produces a win-win solution.Based on the Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001 concerning Implementation of Duties and Authorities of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency Article 3 Letter a states that the dispute resolution process in BPSK can be pursued in three ways, namely by means of Conciliation, Mediation or Arbitration. Through these three ways of resolving it is expected to produce a decision that provides a win-win solution for the parties. However, it is inevitable that in reality not all decisions made by BPSK with this arbitration will give satisfaction to the parties.The purpose of writing this paper is to find out the authority of the District Court to cancel the BPSK Decision and also know how to file an objection to the BPSK Decision.The authority of the District Court to cancel the BPSK Arbitration verdict is based on Article 58 UUPK and Article 41 paragraph (3) Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001.","PeriodicalId":322454,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN MELALUI PENGADILAN NEGERI\",\"authors\":\"D. Manurung\",\"doi\":\"10.35334/ay.v3i2.1550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Litigation dispute resolution is the settlement of a dispute through a court which results in a win and lose decision. The decision gives the one party wins and the other party loses. Non-litigation dispute resolution is the settlement of a dispute outside the court where it produces a win-win solution.Based on the Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001 concerning Implementation of Duties and Authorities of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency Article 3 Letter a states that the dispute resolution process in BPSK can be pursued in three ways, namely by means of Conciliation, Mediation or Arbitration. Through these three ways of resolving it is expected to produce a decision that provides a win-win solution for the parties. However, it is inevitable that in reality not all decisions made by BPSK with this arbitration will give satisfaction to the parties.The purpose of writing this paper is to find out the authority of the District Court to cancel the BPSK Decision and also know how to file an objection to the BPSK Decision.The authority of the District Court to cancel the BPSK Arbitration verdict is based on Article 58 UUPK and Article 41 paragraph (3) Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35334/ay.v3i2.1550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35334/ay.v3i2.1550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要诉讼纠纷解决是通过法院对纠纷进行解决,最终产生输赢的判决。这个决定让一方赢,另一方输。非诉讼纠纷解决是在法庭外解决纠纷,产生双赢的解决方案。根据印度尼西亚共和国工业和贸易部第350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001号关于履行消费者争端解决机构职责和权力的法令,第3条a号信函指出,BPSK的争端解决程序可以通过三种方式进行,即通过调解、调解或仲裁。通过这三种解决方式,预计将产生一个为各方提供双赢解决方案的决定。然而,不可避免的是,在现实中,并不是BPSK在仲裁中做出的所有决定都能让各方满意。撰写本文的目的是了解地方法院撤销BPSK决定的权力,以及如何对BPSK决定提出异议。地区法院撤销BPSK仲裁裁决的权力基于《联合宪法》第58条和印度尼西亚共和国工业和贸易部第350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001号法令第41条第(3)款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN MELALUI PENGADILAN NEGERI
Abstract Litigation dispute resolution is the settlement of a dispute through a court which results in a win and lose decision. The decision gives the one party wins and the other party loses. Non-litigation dispute resolution is the settlement of a dispute outside the court where it produces a win-win solution.Based on the Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001 concerning Implementation of Duties and Authorities of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency Article 3 Letter a states that the dispute resolution process in BPSK can be pursued in three ways, namely by means of Conciliation, Mediation or Arbitration. Through these three ways of resolving it is expected to produce a decision that provides a win-win solution for the parties. However, it is inevitable that in reality not all decisions made by BPSK with this arbitration will give satisfaction to the parties.The purpose of writing this paper is to find out the authority of the District Court to cancel the BPSK Decision and also know how to file an objection to the BPSK Decision.The authority of the District Court to cancel the BPSK Arbitration verdict is based on Article 58 UUPK and Article 41 paragraph (3) Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EKSISTENSI PERJANJIAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA PENGAWASAN OMBUDSMAN TERHADAP PENYELENGGARAAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK PADA MASA PANDEMI CORONA VIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) TANGGUNGJAWAB HUKUM USAHA KLINIK KESEHATAN DI KOTA TARAKAN TERHADAP SEGALA RESIKO USAHA BENTUK KETERBUKAAN RAHASIA MEDIS DALAM SITUASI PANDEMI VIRUS COVID 19 DI INDONESIA ASPEK HUKUM LABORATORIUM FORENSIK KEIMIGRASIAN: STUDI KASUS PEMERIKSAAN PASPOR PALSU KEBANGSAAN INGGRIS ATAS NAMA ABBAS TAUQEER
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1