概念分析:一种批判性的评价

Sethu Madhavan Puravangara
{"title":"概念分析:一种批判性的评价","authors":"Sethu Madhavan Puravangara","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2372524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defining and measuring concepts accurately is essential for good social science research. Giovanni Sartori's views about concepts in Social Science had invited wide attention from social scientists during 1990s. Dr. Sethu Madhavan Puravangara critically reviews the the concept analysis methodology proposed by Giovanni Sartori in this paper. This paper analyses logical steps proposed by Giovanni Sartori in moving from conceptualization to measurement and the relationships among meanings, terms and observations.","PeriodicalId":414104,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Research Methods (Sub-Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concept Analysis: A Critical Appraisal\",\"authors\":\"Sethu Madhavan Puravangara\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2372524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Defining and measuring concepts accurately is essential for good social science research. Giovanni Sartori's views about concepts in Social Science had invited wide attention from social scientists during 1990s. Dr. Sethu Madhavan Puravangara critically reviews the the concept analysis methodology proposed by Giovanni Sartori in this paper. This paper analyses logical steps proposed by Giovanni Sartori in moving from conceptualization to measurement and the relationships among meanings, terms and observations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AARN: Research Methods (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AARN: Research Methods (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2372524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Research Methods (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2372524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确地定义和测量概念对于良好的社会科学研究至关重要。20世纪90年代,Giovanni Sartori关于社会科学概念的观点引起了社会科学家的广泛关注。Sethu Madhavan Puravangara博士批判性地回顾了Giovanni Sartori在论文中提出的概念分析方法。本文分析了Giovanni Sartori提出的从概念化到测量的逻辑步骤,以及意义、术语和观察之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Concept Analysis: A Critical Appraisal
Defining and measuring concepts accurately is essential for good social science research. Giovanni Sartori's views about concepts in Social Science had invited wide attention from social scientists during 1990s. Dr. Sethu Madhavan Puravangara critically reviews the the concept analysis methodology proposed by Giovanni Sartori in this paper. This paper analyses logical steps proposed by Giovanni Sartori in moving from conceptualization to measurement and the relationships among meanings, terms and observations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Placebo Statements in List Experiments A New Framework for Time-Use Analysis Concept Analysis: A Critical Appraisal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1