现代主义与后现代主义的教育领导风格

S. Tabrizi, Glenn W. Rideout
{"title":"现代主义与后现代主义的教育领导风格","authors":"S. Tabrizi, Glenn W. Rideout","doi":"10.20533/IJI.1742.4712.2016.0152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some researchers have identified differences in educational approaches depending on whether a modernist or postmodernist worldview is used. Furthermore, societies in different countries can also take a predominantly modernist or postmodern worldview, with Western countries being primarily postmodernist. Given that situation, there may be leadership styles that are more appropriate to an educational context that is predominantly modernist or postmodernist. Even though postmodernism suggests no “best” style of leadership is possible, since that requires being able to objectively measure leadership effectiveness, there may still be approaches that are most consistent with the postmodernist worldview. This paper explores such a possibility, examining differences between the worldviews and what factors are appropriate in each for educational leadership. Then, two case studies of different countries -Canada for a postmodernist education, and Iran for a modernist education -are briefly presented so that the exploration becomes more concrete.","PeriodicalId":306661,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Infonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Styles of Educational Leadership for Modernist and Postmodernist Approaches\",\"authors\":\"S. Tabrizi, Glenn W. Rideout\",\"doi\":\"10.20533/IJI.1742.4712.2016.0152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some researchers have identified differences in educational approaches depending on whether a modernist or postmodernist worldview is used. Furthermore, societies in different countries can also take a predominantly modernist or postmodern worldview, with Western countries being primarily postmodernist. Given that situation, there may be leadership styles that are more appropriate to an educational context that is predominantly modernist or postmodernist. Even though postmodernism suggests no “best” style of leadership is possible, since that requires being able to objectively measure leadership effectiveness, there may still be approaches that are most consistent with the postmodernist worldview. This paper explores such a possibility, examining differences between the worldviews and what factors are appropriate in each for educational leadership. Then, two case studies of different countries -Canada for a postmodernist education, and Iran for a modernist education -are briefly presented so that the exploration becomes more concrete.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Infonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Infonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20533/IJI.1742.4712.2016.0152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Infonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20533/IJI.1742.4712.2016.0152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

一些研究人员已经确定了教育方法的差异,这取决于是否使用现代主义或后现代主义世界观。此外,不同国家的社会也可以采取以现代主义或后现代主义为主的世界观,西方国家主要是后现代主义。在这种情况下,可能会有更适合现代主义或后现代主义主导的教育背景的领导风格。尽管后现代主义认为没有“最佳”的领导风格是可能的,因为这需要能够客观地衡量领导的有效性,但可能仍然存在与后现代主义世界观最一致的方法。本文探讨了这种可能性,考察了世界观之间的差异,以及哪些因素适合于每种教育领导。然后,简要介绍了加拿大后现代主义教育和伊朗现代主义教育的两个不同国家的案例研究,使探索变得更加具体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Styles of Educational Leadership for Modernist and Postmodernist Approaches
Some researchers have identified differences in educational approaches depending on whether a modernist or postmodernist worldview is used. Furthermore, societies in different countries can also take a predominantly modernist or postmodern worldview, with Western countries being primarily postmodernist. Given that situation, there may be leadership styles that are more appropriate to an educational context that is predominantly modernist or postmodernist. Even though postmodernism suggests no “best” style of leadership is possible, since that requires being able to objectively measure leadership effectiveness, there may still be approaches that are most consistent with the postmodernist worldview. This paper explores such a possibility, examining differences between the worldviews and what factors are appropriate in each for educational leadership. Then, two case studies of different countries -Canada for a postmodernist education, and Iran for a modernist education -are briefly presented so that the exploration becomes more concrete.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AI Adoption for Teaching and Learning of Physics Documenting and Evaluating Educational Impact Through Program Evaluation Schooling and the Challenges of Social Upward Mobility: College Readiness Program in a Borderlands Longitudinal Study Synthesis of ERM Adaptation in Enhancing Transport Organisation’s Performance: The Case of Nigerian Transport Sector A Hybrid and Non-Formal Music Education Connecting China’s Local Family Communities and Cultures with Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1