基于陷阱的软件评审:工程师如何嵌入认知错误导致的bug ?

Ayako Ureshino, Y. Nishi, S. Yoshizawa, Makoto Nonaka, Makiko Asai
{"title":"基于陷阱的软件评审:工程师如何嵌入认知错误导致的bug ?","authors":"Ayako Ureshino, Y. Nishi, S. Yoshizawa, Makoto Nonaka, Makiko Asai","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewing is a key technology to software reliability engineering. One of the most important purposes of reviewing is to detect faults. There are various sorts of reviewing techniques proposed such as Defect-based Reading and Orthogonal Defect Classification, which focus on fault. In this research, we focus on \"trap\" in a developer's cognitive process. A trap is a part of a deliverable or its pattern that induces an engineer to make an error and to embed a fault. Firstly, this paper models the cognitive process called Software Trap model and proposes Trap-based Review (TBR). Secondly, we introduce three traps which were extracted from commercial software development. Then the steps for TBR are also explained. Finally, we show case studies to evaluate effectiveness of TBR in commercial software product in a financial domain. The result showed that TBR succeeded in detecting the faults that were not detected through commercial software development. This paper also mentions how the trap-based approach can be applied to dynamic testing.","PeriodicalId":321448,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"31 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trap-Based Software Review: How Will Engineers Embed Bugs Due to Cognitive Error?\",\"authors\":\"Ayako Ureshino, Y. Nishi, S. Yoshizawa, Makoto Nonaka, Makiko Asai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewing is a key technology to software reliability engineering. One of the most important purposes of reviewing is to detect faults. There are various sorts of reviewing techniques proposed such as Defect-based Reading and Orthogonal Defect Classification, which focus on fault. In this research, we focus on \\\"trap\\\" in a developer's cognitive process. A trap is a part of a deliverable or its pattern that induces an engineer to make an error and to embed a fault. Firstly, this paper models the cognitive process called Software Trap model and proposes Trap-based Review (TBR). Secondly, we introduce three traps which were extracted from commercial software development. Then the steps for TBR are also explained. Finally, we show case studies to evaluate effectiveness of TBR in commercial software product in a financial domain. The result showed that TBR succeeded in detecting the faults that were not detected through commercial software development. This paper also mentions how the trap-based approach can be applied to dynamic testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"volume\":\"31 8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评审是软件可靠性工程的一项关键技术。审查最重要的目的之一是发现错误。目前提出了各种评审技术,如基于缺陷的阅读和正交缺陷分类等,主要针对故障。在本研究中,我们关注开发人员认知过程中的“陷阱”。陷阱是可交付产品或其模式的一部分,它诱导工程师犯错误并嵌入错误。首先,本文建立了认知过程的软件陷阱模型,并提出了基于陷阱的评论(TBR)。其次,我们介绍了从商业软件开发中提取的三个陷阱。然后对TBR的步骤进行了说明。最后,我们展示了案例研究来评估TBR在金融领域的商业软件产品中的有效性。结果表明,TBR能够成功地检测到商业软件开发无法检测到的故障。本文还提到了如何将基于陷阱的方法应用于动态测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trap-Based Software Review: How Will Engineers Embed Bugs Due to Cognitive Error?
Reviewing is a key technology to software reliability engineering. One of the most important purposes of reviewing is to detect faults. There are various sorts of reviewing techniques proposed such as Defect-based Reading and Orthogonal Defect Classification, which focus on fault. In this research, we focus on "trap" in a developer's cognitive process. A trap is a part of a deliverable or its pattern that induces an engineer to make an error and to embed a fault. Firstly, this paper models the cognitive process called Software Trap model and proposes Trap-based Review (TBR). Secondly, we introduce three traps which were extracted from commercial software development. Then the steps for TBR are also explained. Finally, we show case studies to evaluate effectiveness of TBR in commercial software product in a financial domain. The result showed that TBR succeeded in detecting the faults that were not detected through commercial software development. This paper also mentions how the trap-based approach can be applied to dynamic testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Message from the WoSoCer 2018 Workshop Chairs Software Aging and Rejuvenation in the Cloud: A Literature Review Spectrum-Based Fault Localization for Logic-Based Reasoning [Title page iii] Software Reliability Assessment: Modeling and Algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1