{"title":"比较法律史","authors":"Kjell Å Modéer","doi":"10.4337/9781802201468.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A research subject with a European dimension, comparative legal history has only recently been adopted in France, the thesis of jus commune being somewhat difficult to adapt to the national context. From the circulation of the ‘French legal model’, reflection extends to a global analysis of law transfer.","PeriodicalId":411301,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Methods in Law, Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative legal history\",\"authors\":\"Kjell Å Modéer\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781802201468.00008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A research subject with a European dimension, comparative legal history has only recently been adopted in France, the thesis of jus commune being somewhat difficult to adapt to the national context. From the circulation of the ‘French legal model’, reflection extends to a global analysis of law transfer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Methods in Law, Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Methods in Law, Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802201468.00008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Methods in Law, Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802201468.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较法律史作为一门具有欧洲维度的研究课题,在法国是最近才开始采用的,因此“公社法”这一论题在一定程度上难以适应法国的国情。从“法国法律模式”的流通,反思延伸到法律转移的全球分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative legal history
A research subject with a European dimension, comparative legal history has only recently been adopted in France, the thesis of jus commune being somewhat difficult to adapt to the national context. From the circulation of the ‘French legal model’, reflection extends to a global analysis of law transfer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methods in comparative politics Comparative methods in legal anthropology: thick comparison through (cultural) translation Comparative sociology: epistemological issues Comparative disciplines: an introduction Particularism versus universalism in the history of comparative literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1