经阴道超声与Bishop评分预测成功引产的价值

M. Eid, A. Abdallah, Ahmed S. El-Halwagy
{"title":"经阴道超声与Bishop评分预测成功引产的价值","authors":"M. Eid, A. Abdallah, Ahmed S. El-Halwagy","doi":"10.21608/EBWHJ.2017.5576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Induction of labor is a widely used intervention in modern labor. Bishop score, the gold standard for assessing favourability for induction of labor is very subjective with a poor predictive value.Objective: To compare the transvaginal ultrasonography and the score proposed by Kepansereel in prediction of success of labor induction.Patients and Methods: A prospective study involved 50 women subjected to induction of labor. Preinduction assessment of Bishop score and ultrasound measurement of cervical length, posterior cervical angle and cervical funnelling was done.Results: 35 and 15 cases had successful and unsuccessful induction .Cervical length was significantly longer and posterior cervical angle was significantly larger in cases of failed induction (p < 0.001 for both). The Bishop score and Keepanasseril core were significantly lower in association with induction failure (p < 0.001 for both).Conclusion: Successful induction correlated significantly with the Bishop score and ultrasonographic cervical length and posterior cervical angle.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value of transvaginal ultrasonography versus Bishop Score in predicting successful induction of labor\",\"authors\":\"M. Eid, A. Abdallah, Ahmed S. El-Halwagy\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/EBWHJ.2017.5576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Induction of labor is a widely used intervention in modern labor. Bishop score, the gold standard for assessing favourability for induction of labor is very subjective with a poor predictive value.Objective: To compare the transvaginal ultrasonography and the score proposed by Kepansereel in prediction of success of labor induction.Patients and Methods: A prospective study involved 50 women subjected to induction of labor. Preinduction assessment of Bishop score and ultrasound measurement of cervical length, posterior cervical angle and cervical funnelling was done.Results: 35 and 15 cases had successful and unsuccessful induction .Cervical length was significantly longer and posterior cervical angle was significantly larger in cases of failed induction (p < 0.001 for both). The Bishop score and Keepanasseril core were significantly lower in association with induction failure (p < 0.001 for both).Conclusion: Successful induction correlated significantly with the Bishop score and ultrasonographic cervical length and posterior cervical angle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/EBWHJ.2017.5576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/EBWHJ.2017.5576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:引产是现代劳动中广泛应用的一种干预手段。Bishop评分,评估引产有利性的黄金标准是非常主观的,预测价值很差。目的:比较经阴道超声与kepanserel评分对引产成功率的预测价值。患者和方法:一项前瞻性研究涉及50名接受引产的妇女。诱导前评估Bishop评分,超声测量颈长、颈后角、颈漏斗。结果:引产成功者35例,引产不成功者15例,引产失败者颈长明显延长,颈后角明显增大(p < 0.001)。Bishop评分和Keepanasseril core与诱导失败的相关性显著降低(p < 0.001)。结论:诱导成功与超声评分、颈椎长度和颈椎后角有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value of transvaginal ultrasonography versus Bishop Score in predicting successful induction of labor
Background: Induction of labor is a widely used intervention in modern labor. Bishop score, the gold standard for assessing favourability for induction of labor is very subjective with a poor predictive value.Objective: To compare the transvaginal ultrasonography and the score proposed by Kepansereel in prediction of success of labor induction.Patients and Methods: A prospective study involved 50 women subjected to induction of labor. Preinduction assessment of Bishop score and ultrasound measurement of cervical length, posterior cervical angle and cervical funnelling was done.Results: 35 and 15 cases had successful and unsuccessful induction .Cervical length was significantly longer and posterior cervical angle was significantly larger in cases of failed induction (p < 0.001 for both). The Bishop score and Keepanasseril core were significantly lower in association with induction failure (p < 0.001 for both).Conclusion: Successful induction correlated significantly with the Bishop score and ultrasonographic cervical length and posterior cervical angle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hysteroscopy as a diagnostic tool in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, a prospective randomized controlled study Serum Soluble Endoglin Versus Serum Placental Growth Factor for Early Prediction of Preeclampsia Cervical cerclage for Pregnant Women at High-risk of Recurrent Preterm Birth can act beyond its Mechanical Action New ultrasound signs for prediction of early placental Insufficiency Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Intravenous Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss During and After Elective Lower‐Segment Cesarean Delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1