面向大数据应用的关系数据库与键值数据库的比较研究

Wittawat Puangsaijai, S. Puntheeranurak
{"title":"面向大数据应用的关系数据库与键值数据库的比较研究","authors":"Wittawat Puangsaijai, S. Puntheeranurak","doi":"10.1109/IEECON.2017.8075813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, Demands of web scale are in increasing and growing rapidly. Mobile applications, web technologies, social media always generates unstructured data that had lead to the advent of various NoSQL databases. Therefore, Big data applications are necessary to have an efficient technology to collect these data. However, a relational database is the traditional database that always uses in many applications and still has more valuable to play a significant role in the current information system. The main characteristics of NoSQL databases are schema-free, no relationship, no need to join as a relational database. The business organization expects that NoSQL database has better performance than a relational database. In This paper, we aim to compare the performance of Redis, which is a key-value database, one kind of NoSQL database, and MariaDB, which is a popular relational database. We designed a set of experiments with a large amount of data and compared the efficiency of the insert, update, delete and select transactions from various aspects on the same dataset. We measure the processing time of each transaction to evaluate the comparison. The results have shown that Redis has better runtime performance for insert, delete, update transaction under a specific condition or complex queries. MariaDB still is good for some conditions especially when we have a small data. Our study can help to choose a database that will be suitable for the real world applications because relational databases and NoSQL databases have different strengths and weakness.","PeriodicalId":196081,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of relational database and key-value database for big data applications\",\"authors\":\"Wittawat Puangsaijai, S. Puntheeranurak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEECON.2017.8075813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, Demands of web scale are in increasing and growing rapidly. Mobile applications, web technologies, social media always generates unstructured data that had lead to the advent of various NoSQL databases. Therefore, Big data applications are necessary to have an efficient technology to collect these data. However, a relational database is the traditional database that always uses in many applications and still has more valuable to play a significant role in the current information system. The main characteristics of NoSQL databases are schema-free, no relationship, no need to join as a relational database. The business organization expects that NoSQL database has better performance than a relational database. In This paper, we aim to compare the performance of Redis, which is a key-value database, one kind of NoSQL database, and MariaDB, which is a popular relational database. We designed a set of experiments with a large amount of data and compared the efficiency of the insert, update, delete and select transactions from various aspects on the same dataset. We measure the processing time of each transaction to evaluate the comparison. The results have shown that Redis has better runtime performance for insert, delete, update transaction under a specific condition or complex queries. MariaDB still is good for some conditions especially when we have a small data. Our study can help to choose a database that will be suitable for the real world applications because relational databases and NoSQL databases have different strengths and weakness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEECON.2017.8075813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEECON.2017.8075813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

当今社会,对网络规模的需求不断增加,增长迅速。移动应用程序、网络技术、社交媒体总是产生非结构化数据,这导致了各种NoSQL数据库的出现。因此,大数据应用需要有一种高效的技术来收集这些数据。而关系数据库是传统的数据库,在许多应用程序中始终使用,在当前的信息系统中仍然发挥着更有价值的重要作用。NoSQL数据库的主要特点是无模式、无关系、不需要作为关系数据库进行连接。业务组织期望NoSQL数据库具有比关系数据库更好的性能。在本文中,我们的目的是比较Redis的性能,Redis是一种键值数据库,是NoSQL数据库的一种,MariaDB是一种流行的关系数据库。我们设计了一组具有大量数据的实验,比较了同一数据集上不同方面的插入、更新、删除和选择事务的效率。我们测量每个事务的处理时间来评估比较。结果表明,Redis对于特定条件下的插入、删除、更新事务或复杂查询具有更好的运行时性能。MariaDB在某些情况下仍然很好,特别是当我们有小数据时。我们的研究可以帮助选择一个数据库,将适合现实世界的应用程序,因为关系数据库和NoSQL数据库有不同的优势和劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study of relational database and key-value database for big data applications
Nowadays, Demands of web scale are in increasing and growing rapidly. Mobile applications, web technologies, social media always generates unstructured data that had lead to the advent of various NoSQL databases. Therefore, Big data applications are necessary to have an efficient technology to collect these data. However, a relational database is the traditional database that always uses in many applications and still has more valuable to play a significant role in the current information system. The main characteristics of NoSQL databases are schema-free, no relationship, no need to join as a relational database. The business organization expects that NoSQL database has better performance than a relational database. In This paper, we aim to compare the performance of Redis, which is a key-value database, one kind of NoSQL database, and MariaDB, which is a popular relational database. We designed a set of experiments with a large amount of data and compared the efficiency of the insert, update, delete and select transactions from various aspects on the same dataset. We measure the processing time of each transaction to evaluate the comparison. The results have shown that Redis has better runtime performance for insert, delete, update transaction under a specific condition or complex queries. MariaDB still is good for some conditions especially when we have a small data. Our study can help to choose a database that will be suitable for the real world applications because relational databases and NoSQL databases have different strengths and weakness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive power flow control for reducing peak demand and maximizing renewable energy usage Fuzzy based random pulse width modulation technique for performance improvement of induction motor Condition evaluation of power transformers using dissolved gas analysis and dielectric breakdown voltage test The hybrid photovoltaic energy system for electric vehicle battery charger Analysis and modeling of wind turbine generators considering frequency controls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1