看到程序输出提高新手学习收益

Juho Leinonen, Arto Hellas, John Edwards
{"title":"看到程序输出提高新手学习收益","authors":"Juho Leinonen, Arto Hellas, John Edwards","doi":"10.1145/3587102.3588796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we report results from a randomized controlled trial where novice programmers completed code mimicking exercises -- writing and modifying code shown to them -- designed to help learn the basics of how variables work. Using a tailored code writing system with feedback on program correctness, we conducted a two-group design study where only one of the groups could see the program output and feedback on the correctness of the program they wrote, while the other group just saw feedback on correctness. Learning gain was measured using a code-reading multiple choice questionnaire as both a pretest and a posttest. Our data suggests that being able to see program output leads to higher learning gains for novices, when compared to just being able to see feedback on the correctness of the code. For more experienced students, we observed benefits from code mimicking in both groups, without a strong distinction between being able to see the output and not being able to see the output. Based on our experiment, we recommend that environments used by novices for learning programming should encourage -- or even require -- running the code before allowing submitting the program for assessment.","PeriodicalId":410890,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1","volume":"os-43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeing Program Output Improves Novice Learning Gains\",\"authors\":\"Juho Leinonen, Arto Hellas, John Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3587102.3588796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we report results from a randomized controlled trial where novice programmers completed code mimicking exercises -- writing and modifying code shown to them -- designed to help learn the basics of how variables work. Using a tailored code writing system with feedback on program correctness, we conducted a two-group design study where only one of the groups could see the program output and feedback on the correctness of the program they wrote, while the other group just saw feedback on correctness. Learning gain was measured using a code-reading multiple choice questionnaire as both a pretest and a posttest. Our data suggests that being able to see program output leads to higher learning gains for novices, when compared to just being able to see feedback on the correctness of the code. For more experienced students, we observed benefits from code mimicking in both groups, without a strong distinction between being able to see the output and not being able to see the output. Based on our experiment, we recommend that environments used by novices for learning programming should encourage -- or even require -- running the code before allowing submitting the program for assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1\",\"volume\":\"os-43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3587102.3588796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3587102.3588796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们报告了一项随机对照试验的结果,在该试验中,程序员新手完成了代码模拟练习——编写和修改展示给他们的代码——旨在帮助学习变量如何工作的基础知识。使用带有程序正确性反馈的定制代码编写系统,我们进行了一项两组设计研究,其中只有一组可以看到程序输出和关于他们编写的程序正确性的反馈,而另一组只能看到关于正确性的反馈。学习增益的测量采用编码阅读多项选择问卷作为前测和后测。我们的数据表明,与仅仅能够看到代码正确性的反馈相比,能够看到程序输出会给新手带来更高的学习收益。对于更有经验的学生,我们观察到两个组都从代码模仿中获益,在能够看到输出和不能看到输出之间没有明显的区别。根据我们的实验,我们建议初学者用于学习编程的环境应该鼓励——或者甚至要求——在允许提交程序进行评估之前运行代码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seeing Program Output Improves Novice Learning Gains
In this article, we report results from a randomized controlled trial where novice programmers completed code mimicking exercises -- writing and modifying code shown to them -- designed to help learn the basics of how variables work. Using a tailored code writing system with feedback on program correctness, we conducted a two-group design study where only one of the groups could see the program output and feedback on the correctness of the program they wrote, while the other group just saw feedback on correctness. Learning gain was measured using a code-reading multiple choice questionnaire as both a pretest and a posttest. Our data suggests that being able to see program output leads to higher learning gains for novices, when compared to just being able to see feedback on the correctness of the code. For more experienced students, we observed benefits from code mimicking in both groups, without a strong distinction between being able to see the output and not being able to see the output. Based on our experiment, we recommend that environments used by novices for learning programming should encourage -- or even require -- running the code before allowing submitting the program for assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Problem Generation for CTF-Style Assessments in IT Forensics Courses The Value of Time Extensions in Identifying Students Abilities Studied Questions in Data Structures and Algorithms Assessments Exploring CS1 Student's Notions of Code Quality Pseudocode vs. Compile-and-Run Prompts: Comparing Measures of Student Programming Ability in CS1 and CS2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1