观看侦探:与经验软件工程研究界合作的工业实验的初步报告

K. Wallace
{"title":"观看侦探:与经验软件工程研究界合作的工业实验的初步报告","authors":"K. Wallace","doi":"10.1145/3195546.3195550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Evidence-based practice within healthcare benefits from the Cochrane Collaboration providing trustworthy evidence that can be used to inform clinical decisions. Currently no equivalent resource exists for the practice of software engineering. With the ever increasing dependence of society upon software an analogue of the collaboration for the discipline of software engineering would appear to be of potentially significant societal benefit. Objectives: This study investigated attitudes of the empirical software engineering community, as exemplified by attendees at an research focused conference, to the hypothesis that an analogue of the Cochrane Collaboration would be beneficial. Method: An online survey was employed to capture opinions of participants in the EASE’16 conference on the hypothesis. During a presentation at the industrial track of the conference attendees (27) were invited to complete the survey. Subsequently all conference attendees (90) were provided with details of the survey, irrespective of whether they had attended the presentation or not. No closing date for the survey was specified. Results: In total 9 conference attendees completed the survey: of whom 7 had attended the industrial track presentation. These figures approximate to a response rate of 26% for those attending the presentation and exactly 10% for conference participants overall. This response rate is insufficient to enable statistical analysis of the data obtained through the survey. Trends are, however, evident in the rankings of the responses provided. These trends are consistent with opinions and observations volunteered by a diverse range of individuals active in software engineering and allied fields dating from 2014 to the present. Conclusions: At this time there is insufficient data to validate the hypothesis. Nevertheless experience, informal observation and opinion continues to accumulate to provide evidence in support of the validity of the hypothesis, albeit principally in anecdotal form.","PeriodicalId":178576,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice (SER&IP)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Watching the Detectives: An Initial Report on an Industrial Experiment to Collaborate with the Empirical Software Engineering Research Community\",\"authors\":\"K. Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3195546.3195550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Evidence-based practice within healthcare benefits from the Cochrane Collaboration providing trustworthy evidence that can be used to inform clinical decisions. Currently no equivalent resource exists for the practice of software engineering. With the ever increasing dependence of society upon software an analogue of the collaboration for the discipline of software engineering would appear to be of potentially significant societal benefit. Objectives: This study investigated attitudes of the empirical software engineering community, as exemplified by attendees at an research focused conference, to the hypothesis that an analogue of the Cochrane Collaboration would be beneficial. Method: An online survey was employed to capture opinions of participants in the EASE’16 conference on the hypothesis. During a presentation at the industrial track of the conference attendees (27) were invited to complete the survey. Subsequently all conference attendees (90) were provided with details of the survey, irrespective of whether they had attended the presentation or not. No closing date for the survey was specified. Results: In total 9 conference attendees completed the survey: of whom 7 had attended the industrial track presentation. These figures approximate to a response rate of 26% for those attending the presentation and exactly 10% for conference participants overall. This response rate is insufficient to enable statistical analysis of the data obtained through the survey. Trends are, however, evident in the rankings of the responses provided. These trends are consistent with opinions and observations volunteered by a diverse range of individuals active in software engineering and allied fields dating from 2014 to the present. Conclusions: At this time there is insufficient data to validate the hypothesis. Nevertheless experience, informal observation and opinion continues to accumulate to provide evidence in support of the validity of the hypothesis, albeit principally in anecdotal form.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice (SER&IP)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice (SER&IP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3195546.3195550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice (SER&IP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3195546.3195550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:医疗保健领域的循证实践受益于Cochrane协作,它提供了可用于临床决策的可靠证据。目前还没有软件工程实践的同等资源。随着社会对软件的依赖日益增加,软件工程学科的协作的类似物似乎具有潜在的重大社会效益。目的:本研究调查了经验软件工程社区的态度,例如在一个以研究为重点的会议上的与会者,对Cochrane协作的模拟将是有益的假设。方法:采用在线调查的方式,收集EASE ' 16会议参与者对该假设的看法。在会议工业专场的一次演讲中,与会者(27人)被邀请完成调查。随后,所有出席会议的人士(90人),不论是否出席报告,均获提供调查的详情。没有指定调查的截止日期。结果:共有9名与会人员完成了调查,其中7人参加了行业专题展示。这些数字接近于出席演示的人的回复率为26%,而整个会议参与者的回复率正好为10%。这个回复率不足以对通过调查获得的数据进行统计分析。然而,从所提供答复的排名中可以明显看出趋势。这些趋势与2014年至今活跃在软件工程和相关领域的各种各样的个人自愿提出的意见和观察一致。结论:目前没有足够的数据来验证假设。尽管如此,经验、非正式观察和意见不断积累,尽管主要是以轶事的形式,为支持这一假设的有效性提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Watching the Detectives: An Initial Report on an Industrial Experiment to Collaborate with the Empirical Software Engineering Research Community
Context: Evidence-based practice within healthcare benefits from the Cochrane Collaboration providing trustworthy evidence that can be used to inform clinical decisions. Currently no equivalent resource exists for the practice of software engineering. With the ever increasing dependence of society upon software an analogue of the collaboration for the discipline of software engineering would appear to be of potentially significant societal benefit. Objectives: This study investigated attitudes of the empirical software engineering community, as exemplified by attendees at an research focused conference, to the hypothesis that an analogue of the Cochrane Collaboration would be beneficial. Method: An online survey was employed to capture opinions of participants in the EASE’16 conference on the hypothesis. During a presentation at the industrial track of the conference attendees (27) were invited to complete the survey. Subsequently all conference attendees (90) were provided with details of the survey, irrespective of whether they had attended the presentation or not. No closing date for the survey was specified. Results: In total 9 conference attendees completed the survey: of whom 7 had attended the industrial track presentation. These figures approximate to a response rate of 26% for those attending the presentation and exactly 10% for conference participants overall. This response rate is insufficient to enable statistical analysis of the data obtained through the survey. Trends are, however, evident in the rankings of the responses provided. These trends are consistent with opinions and observations volunteered by a diverse range of individuals active in software engineering and allied fields dating from 2014 to the present. Conclusions: At this time there is insufficient data to validate the hypothesis. Nevertheless experience, informal observation and opinion continues to accumulate to provide evidence in support of the validity of the hypothesis, albeit principally in anecdotal form.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Continuously Evaluated Research Projects in Collaborative Decoupled Environments From Theory to Practice: Experiences of Industry-Academia Collaboration from a Practitioner A Project on Software Defect Prevention at Commit-Time: A Success Story of University-Industry Research Collaboration Watching the Detectives: An Initial Report on an Industrial Experiment to Collaborate with the Empirical Software Engineering Research Community Decoding Technology Transfer through Experiences at Microsoft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1