骨盆测量与常规x线摄影及不同计算机断层摄影方法的比较研究

Erika Phexell, M. Söderberg, A. Bolejko
{"title":"骨盆测量与常规x线摄影及不同计算机断层摄影方法的比较研究","authors":"Erika Phexell, M. Söderberg, A. Bolejko","doi":"10.15406/IJRRT.2018.05.00171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Conventional radiography and computed tomography CT can result in different radiation doses to the foetus when pelvimetry needs to be performed before childbirth New techniques in diagnostic imaging provide the basis for the optimization of radiation dose and create opportunities for higher measurement accuracy The purpose of the study was to estimate the radiation dose to the foetus from pelvimetry performed using conventional radiography compared to different CT methods namely the topogram method cross sectional method short spiral method standard spiral method and flash spiral method Methods An anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescent dosemeters TLD were used for the dose measurements Bags with sodium chloride were placed on top of the phantom rsquo s abdomen and were used to simulate the last month of pregnancy The foetal radiation dose was equated to the absorbed energy to the TLDs placed at the area of the birth canal uterus Results Themean absorbed dose to the foetus was measured with conventional radiographic technique to mGy The mean absorbed dose to the foetus with the various CT methods resulted in mGy topogram mGy cross sectional mGy short spiral mGy standard spiral and mGy flash spiral Conclusion Although the absorbed dose to the foetus was higher in the CT pelvimetry methods the dose levels are low The CT spiral methods allowed adjustments in multiplane image reconstructions which could increase measurement accuracy However further studies are needed to investigate different CT pelvimetry methods in relation to measurement accuracy","PeriodicalId":214028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiology & Radiation Therapy","volume":"11 suppl_1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of foetal radiation dose in a comparative study of pelvimetry with conventional radiography and different computer tomography methods\",\"authors\":\"Erika Phexell, M. Söderberg, A. Bolejko\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/IJRRT.2018.05.00171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Conventional radiography and computed tomography CT can result in different radiation doses to the foetus when pelvimetry needs to be performed before childbirth New techniques in diagnostic imaging provide the basis for the optimization of radiation dose and create opportunities for higher measurement accuracy The purpose of the study was to estimate the radiation dose to the foetus from pelvimetry performed using conventional radiography compared to different CT methods namely the topogram method cross sectional method short spiral method standard spiral method and flash spiral method Methods An anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescent dosemeters TLD were used for the dose measurements Bags with sodium chloride were placed on top of the phantom rsquo s abdomen and were used to simulate the last month of pregnancy The foetal radiation dose was equated to the absorbed energy to the TLDs placed at the area of the birth canal uterus Results Themean absorbed dose to the foetus was measured with conventional radiographic technique to mGy The mean absorbed dose to the foetus with the various CT methods resulted in mGy topogram mGy cross sectional mGy short spiral mGy standard spiral and mGy flash spiral Conclusion Although the absorbed dose to the foetus was higher in the CT pelvimetry methods the dose levels are low The CT spiral methods allowed adjustments in multiplane image reconstructions which could increase measurement accuracy However further studies are needed to investigate different CT pelvimetry methods in relation to measurement accuracy\",\"PeriodicalId\":214028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiology & Radiation Therapy\",\"volume\":\"11 suppl_1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiology & Radiation Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/IJRRT.2018.05.00171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiology & Radiation Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/IJRRT.2018.05.00171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

当需要在产前进行骨盆测量时,传统的x线摄影和计算机断层扫描CT会导致胎儿受到不同的辐射剂量。诊断成像的新技术为优化辐射剂量提供了基础,并为更高的测量精度创造了机会。本研究的目的是估计使用传统x线摄影进行骨盆测量对胎儿的辐射剂量,并与不同的CT方法进行比较topogram横断法短螺旋方法标准螺旋法和flash螺旋方法方法一个拟人化的幻影和热释光的放射量测定器TLD剂量用于测量包与氯化钠被放置在幻影去腹部和被用来模拟上个月怀孕的胎儿被等同于吸收辐射能量TLD放置在产道的面积子宫结果Themean吸收剂量不同CT测量方法对胎儿的平均吸收剂量有不同程度的变化,分别为mGy地面图、mGy横截面图、mGy短螺旋图、mGy标准螺旋图和mGy闪光螺旋图。结论CT骨盆测量方法对胎儿的吸收剂量较高,但剂量水平较低,CT螺旋法可在多平面图像重建中进行调整,提高测量精度,但还有待进一步研究需要研究不同的CT骨盆测量方法与测量精度的关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of foetal radiation dose in a comparative study of pelvimetry with conventional radiography and different computer tomography methods
Introduction Conventional radiography and computed tomography CT can result in different radiation doses to the foetus when pelvimetry needs to be performed before childbirth New techniques in diagnostic imaging provide the basis for the optimization of radiation dose and create opportunities for higher measurement accuracy The purpose of the study was to estimate the radiation dose to the foetus from pelvimetry performed using conventional radiography compared to different CT methods namely the topogram method cross sectional method short spiral method standard spiral method and flash spiral method Methods An anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescent dosemeters TLD were used for the dose measurements Bags with sodium chloride were placed on top of the phantom rsquo s abdomen and were used to simulate the last month of pregnancy The foetal radiation dose was equated to the absorbed energy to the TLDs placed at the area of the birth canal uterus Results Themean absorbed dose to the foetus was measured with conventional radiographic technique to mGy The mean absorbed dose to the foetus with the various CT methods resulted in mGy topogram mGy cross sectional mGy short spiral mGy standard spiral and mGy flash spiral Conclusion Although the absorbed dose to the foetus was higher in the CT pelvimetry methods the dose levels are low The CT spiral methods allowed adjustments in multiplane image reconstructions which could increase measurement accuracy However further studies are needed to investigate different CT pelvimetry methods in relation to measurement accuracy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Very long-term of survival, 5 years and more in diffuse intrinsic pontine brainstem gliomas in children and adolescents treated with Radiotherapy and Nimotuzumab Radiological CT findings and time evolution in acute stroke: case report Adaptive radiotherapy from past to future frontiers Lesion-based radiotherapy of the ears, lips and eyelids for skin cancer Lesion-based radiotherapy for non-melanoma skin cancer of the lower legs with a focus on radiation induced ulcers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1