数字证据可采性:方法论、挑战与研究方向

E. O. Edward, J. Ojeniyi
{"title":"数字证据可采性:方法论、挑战与研究方向","authors":"E. O. Edward, J. Ojeniyi","doi":"10.1109/ICECCO48375.2019.9043250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Admissibility of Evidence is the eligibility of particular pieces of evidence for inception as part of the evidence in a case. Admissibility means the character or quality to be accepted and allowed to be presented or introduced as evidence in court. To be admissible means capable of being legally admitted or allowable or permissible as evidence or worthy of gaining entry or being admitted. This study focus on carrying out a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on Digital Evidence Admissibility. The methodology employed in this study was the querying of four academic database resources systematically and fundamentally identifying kinds of literature related to digital evidence admissibility through identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion criteria. The advantage of this study is revealing the gap and trends in digital evidence admissibility as the article published between the period of 2015 through 2018 are relative with the following variation 64%, 21% 7%, for the following respectively, IEEE, Science Direct, ACM Digital library, as well as Research Gate. While at the period under review, 2019 is yet to record publication in the field of research in Digital Evidence Admissibility. The period under review witnessed a low academic publication in the field of Digital Evidence admissibility. This research will aid in projecting future research in the aforementioned research field.","PeriodicalId":166322,"journal":{"name":"2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Literature Review On Digital Evidence Admissibility: Methodologies, Challenges and Research Directions\",\"authors\":\"E. O. Edward, J. Ojeniyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECCO48375.2019.9043250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Admissibility of Evidence is the eligibility of particular pieces of evidence for inception as part of the evidence in a case. Admissibility means the character or quality to be accepted and allowed to be presented or introduced as evidence in court. To be admissible means capable of being legally admitted or allowable or permissible as evidence or worthy of gaining entry or being admitted. This study focus on carrying out a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on Digital Evidence Admissibility. The methodology employed in this study was the querying of four academic database resources systematically and fundamentally identifying kinds of literature related to digital evidence admissibility through identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion criteria. The advantage of this study is revealing the gap and trends in digital evidence admissibility as the article published between the period of 2015 through 2018 are relative with the following variation 64%, 21% 7%, for the following respectively, IEEE, Science Direct, ACM Digital library, as well as Research Gate. While at the period under review, 2019 is yet to record publication in the field of research in Digital Evidence Admissibility. The period under review witnessed a low academic publication in the field of Digital Evidence admissibility. This research will aid in projecting future research in the aforementioned research field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCO48375.2019.9043250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCO48375.2019.9043250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

证据的可采性是指特定证据是否有资格成为案件证据的一部分。可采性是指可以接受并允许作为证据在法庭上提出或引入的性质或性质。被允许的意思是能够被合法承认或允许或允许作为证据或值得进入或被允许。本研究的重点是对数字证据可采性进行系统的文献综述和元分析。本研究采用的方法是对四种学术数据库资源进行系统查询,通过识别、筛选、资格和纳入标准,从根本上识别出与数字证据可采性相关的文献种类。本研究的优势在于揭示了数字证据可采性的差距和趋势,因为2015年至2018年期间发表的文章与以下变化相关,分别为IEEE, Science Direct, ACM数字图书馆和Research Gate。在本报告所述期间,2019年还没有在数字证据可采性研究领域发表论文。在本报告所述期间,数字证据可采性领域的学术出版物很少。这项研究将有助于预测上述研究领域的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systematic Literature Review On Digital Evidence Admissibility: Methodologies, Challenges and Research Directions
Admissibility of Evidence is the eligibility of particular pieces of evidence for inception as part of the evidence in a case. Admissibility means the character or quality to be accepted and allowed to be presented or introduced as evidence in court. To be admissible means capable of being legally admitted or allowable or permissible as evidence or worthy of gaining entry or being admitted. This study focus on carrying out a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on Digital Evidence Admissibility. The methodology employed in this study was the querying of four academic database resources systematically and fundamentally identifying kinds of literature related to digital evidence admissibility through identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion criteria. The advantage of this study is revealing the gap and trends in digital evidence admissibility as the article published between the period of 2015 through 2018 are relative with the following variation 64%, 21% 7%, for the following respectively, IEEE, Science Direct, ACM Digital library, as well as Research Gate. While at the period under review, 2019 is yet to record publication in the field of research in Digital Evidence Admissibility. The period under review witnessed a low academic publication in the field of Digital Evidence admissibility. This research will aid in projecting future research in the aforementioned research field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Investigation into Peer-to-Peer Network Security Using Wireshark Greenhouse Monitoring and Control System with an Arduino System Transfer Learning Based Histopathologic Image Classification for Burns Recognition Modelling And Realization of a Compact CPW Transmission Lines Using 3D Mmics Technology in ADS Momentum Review of Advances in Machine Learning Based Protein Secondary Structure Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1