利多卡因与地塞米松减轻全身麻醉后喉咙痛的比较研究

Mohammed Mohammed, Ali El Said Rashad
{"title":"利多卡因与地塞米松减轻全身麻醉后喉咙痛的比较研究","authors":"Mohammed Mohammed, Ali El Said Rashad","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_74_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Postoperative sore throat (POST) is commonly reported by patients after endotracheal intubation. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine and dexamethasone in the prevention of such problem. Patients and methods We included a total of 394 cases who were randomly divided using the closed-envelope method into two groups: group D that included 197 cases who received intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg), and group L that included the remaining 197 cases who received intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg). Both the incidence and risk factors for POST were assessed. Results Sore throat was reported by 115 (58.4%) cases in group L, whereas it was reported by 82 (41.6%) cases of cases in the other group. There was a marked reduction of sore-throat sensation in group D (P<0.001). Logistic regression revealed that the presence of blood on suction was a significant risk factor for developing sore throat after intubation. Conclusion Intravenous administration of dexamethasone appears to be more promising than lidocaine in decreasing the incidence of POST.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lidocaine versus dexamethasone for reduction of sore throat after general anesthesia: a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Mohammed, Ali El Said Rashad\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/roaic.roaic_74_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Postoperative sore throat (POST) is commonly reported by patients after endotracheal intubation. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine and dexamethasone in the prevention of such problem. Patients and methods We included a total of 394 cases who were randomly divided using the closed-envelope method into two groups: group D that included 197 cases who received intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg), and group L that included the remaining 197 cases who received intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg). Both the incidence and risk factors for POST were assessed. Results Sore throat was reported by 115 (58.4%) cases in group L, whereas it was reported by 82 (41.6%) cases of cases in the other group. There was a marked reduction of sore-throat sensation in group D (P<0.001). Logistic regression revealed that the presence of blood on suction was a significant risk factor for developing sore throat after intubation. Conclusion Intravenous administration of dexamethasone appears to be more promising than lidocaine in decreasing the incidence of POST.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_74_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_74_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景术后喉咙痛(POST)是气管插管后患者常见的症状。本研究比较静脉注射利多卡因与地塞米松预防此类问题的疗效。患者和方法将394例患者随机分为两组:D组197例静脉注射地塞米松(8 mg), L组197例静脉注射利多卡因(1.5 mg/kg)。对POST的发病率和危险因素进行了评估。结果L组出现喉咙痛115例(58.4%),而另一组出现喉咙痛82例(41.6%)。D组患者咽喉痛感明显减轻(P<0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示,吸盘上有血是插管后发生咽喉痛的重要危险因素。结论静脉给药地塞米松比利多卡因更有可能降低POST的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lidocaine versus dexamethasone for reduction of sore throat after general anesthesia: a comparative study
Background Postoperative sore throat (POST) is commonly reported by patients after endotracheal intubation. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine and dexamethasone in the prevention of such problem. Patients and methods We included a total of 394 cases who were randomly divided using the closed-envelope method into two groups: group D that included 197 cases who received intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg), and group L that included the remaining 197 cases who received intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg). Both the incidence and risk factors for POST were assessed. Results Sore throat was reported by 115 (58.4%) cases in group L, whereas it was reported by 82 (41.6%) cases of cases in the other group. There was a marked reduction of sore-throat sensation in group D (P<0.001). Logistic regression revealed that the presence of blood on suction was a significant risk factor for developing sore throat after intubation. Conclusion Intravenous administration of dexamethasone appears to be more promising than lidocaine in decreasing the incidence of POST.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of combined pulsed radiofrequency and steroid injection to the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized clinical trial Sacrococcygeal local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups Prediction of protective lung tidal volume using the ulna length in Egyptian adults Characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1