使用和不使用抗生素骨水泥的成本效益:一个更广泛的视角

Oliver Sogard, Gregory A. Brown
{"title":"使用和不使用抗生素骨水泥的成本效益:一个更广泛的视角","authors":"Oliver Sogard, Gregory A. Brown","doi":"10.60118/001c.74412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs) increase total costs of care. Retrospective registry/institutional studies with selection bias and underpowered meta-analyses have corrupted the evidence base regarding antibiotic-laden bone cement (ALBC) use in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend using cement fixation of femoral components in hip fracture patients to prevent PFFs, but have no recommendations regarding ALBC. Hip osteoarthritis CPGs have no bone cement recommendations regarding prevention of PJIs or PFFs. ALBC is potentially cost-effective by reducing PJIs, PFFs, and reducing implant costs. A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and registry reports related to the efficacy of ALBC in reducing PJIs and cemented femoral fixation in reducing PFFs. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) are calculated. Cost-effectiveness margins per case are calculated. A pooled analysis of four TKA RCTs found ALBC reduces PJI by 0.94% (p=0.027), NNT 106. A total hip arthroplasty (THA) meta-analysis found ALBC reduces PJI by 0.58% (p<0.0001), NNT 172. A hip hemiarthroplasty (HH) RCT found high-dose dual-antibiotic ALBC reduces PJI by 2.35% (p=0.0474), NNT 43. A THA registry report found that cemented fixation compared to ingrowth fixation reduced PFFs by 0.44% (p<0.0001), NNT 229. A pooled analysis of three HH RCTs found that cemented femoral stem fixation reduced PFFs by 5.09% (p-0.0099), NNT 20. Mean PJI treatment costs are $80,000. Mean PFF treatment costs are $27,596. Mean HH cemented femoral stem cost reduction: $685. Using ALBC: TKA margin/case is $755; THA margin/case is $586; and HH margin/case is $3,925. Using plain bone cement: TKA margin/case is $0; THA margin/case is $121; and HH margin/case is $2,065. A broader perspective demonstrates that ALBC provides significant financial margins in TKAs, THAs, and hip hemiarthroplasties. ALBC is cost-effective when including the additional costs of using ALBC in TKAs, THAs, and hip hemiarthroplasties. Hand-mixed ALBC is more cost-effective than pre-mixed ALBC in all scenarios.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness of Bone Cement With and Without Antibiotics: A Broader Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Sogard, Gregory A. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.60118/001c.74412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs) increase total costs of care. Retrospective registry/institutional studies with selection bias and underpowered meta-analyses have corrupted the evidence base regarding antibiotic-laden bone cement (ALBC) use in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend using cement fixation of femoral components in hip fracture patients to prevent PFFs, but have no recommendations regarding ALBC. Hip osteoarthritis CPGs have no bone cement recommendations regarding prevention of PJIs or PFFs. ALBC is potentially cost-effective by reducing PJIs, PFFs, and reducing implant costs. A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and registry reports related to the efficacy of ALBC in reducing PJIs and cemented femoral fixation in reducing PFFs. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) are calculated. Cost-effectiveness margins per case are calculated. A pooled analysis of four TKA RCTs found ALBC reduces PJI by 0.94% (p=0.027), NNT 106. A total hip arthroplasty (THA) meta-analysis found ALBC reduces PJI by 0.58% (p<0.0001), NNT 172. A hip hemiarthroplasty (HH) RCT found high-dose dual-antibiotic ALBC reduces PJI by 2.35% (p=0.0474), NNT 43. A THA registry report found that cemented fixation compared to ingrowth fixation reduced PFFs by 0.44% (p<0.0001), NNT 229. A pooled analysis of three HH RCTs found that cemented femoral stem fixation reduced PFFs by 5.09% (p-0.0099), NNT 20. Mean PJI treatment costs are $80,000. Mean PFF treatment costs are $27,596. Mean HH cemented femoral stem cost reduction: $685. Using ALBC: TKA margin/case is $755; THA margin/case is $586; and HH margin/case is $3,925. Using plain bone cement: TKA margin/case is $0; THA margin/case is $121; and HH margin/case is $2,065. A broader perspective demonstrates that ALBC provides significant financial margins in TKAs, THAs, and hip hemiarthroplasties. ALBC is cost-effective when including the additional costs of using ALBC in TKAs, THAs, and hip hemiarthroplasties. Hand-mixed ALBC is more cost-effective than pre-mixed ALBC in all scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.74412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.74412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

假体周围关节感染(PJIs)和假体周围股骨骨折(pff)增加了总护理成本。回顾性登记/机构研究的选择偏倚和不足的荟萃分析已经破坏了全膝关节置换术(tka)中使用含抗生素骨水泥(ALBC)的证据基础。临床实践指南(CPGs)推荐在髋部骨折患者中使用水泥固定股骨假体来预防pff,但对ALBC没有建议。髋关节骨性关节炎CPGs没有关于预防PJIs或pff的骨水泥建议。ALBC通过减少pji、pff和降低植入物成本而具有潜在的成本效益。系统回顾了随机对照试验(rct)、荟萃分析和登记报告,以确定ALBC在减少pji和股骨骨水泥固定治疗pff方面的疗效。计算治疗所需的数字(NNT)。计算每个案例的成本效益边际。四项TKA随机对照试验的汇总分析发现,ALBC使PJI降低0.94% (p=0.027), NNT为106。一项全髋关节置换术(THA)荟萃分析发现,ALBC可使PJI降低0.58% (p<0.0001), NNT 172。一项髋关节置换术(HH) RCT发现,高剂量双抗生素ALBC可使PJI减少2.35% (p=0.0474), NNT 43。THA注册报告发现,与长入固定相比,骨水泥固定可使PFFs降低0.44% (p<0.0001), NNT 229。一项对3项HH随机对照试验的汇总分析发现,骨水泥股骨干固定可使pff降低5.09% (p-0.0099), NNT 20。PJI的平均治疗费用为8万美元。平均PFF治疗费用为27,596美元。平均HH骨水泥股骨干成本降低:685美元。使用ALBC: TKA保证金/case为755美元;每件保证金为586美元;HH利润率为3925美元。使用普通骨水泥:TKA边际为0美元/例;每个案例的保证金为121美元;HH利润率为2065美元。从更广泛的角度来看,ALBC在tka、tha和髋关节半置换术中提供了显著的经济利润。当包括在tka、tha和髋关节半置换术中使用ALBC的额外费用时,ALBC具有成本效益。在所有情况下,手工混合ALBC都比预混合ALBC更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-Effectiveness of Bone Cement With and Without Antibiotics: A Broader Perspective
Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs) increase total costs of care. Retrospective registry/institutional studies with selection bias and underpowered meta-analyses have corrupted the evidence base regarding antibiotic-laden bone cement (ALBC) use in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend using cement fixation of femoral components in hip fracture patients to prevent PFFs, but have no recommendations regarding ALBC. Hip osteoarthritis CPGs have no bone cement recommendations regarding prevention of PJIs or PFFs. ALBC is potentially cost-effective by reducing PJIs, PFFs, and reducing implant costs. A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and registry reports related to the efficacy of ALBC in reducing PJIs and cemented femoral fixation in reducing PFFs. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) are calculated. Cost-effectiveness margins per case are calculated. A pooled analysis of four TKA RCTs found ALBC reduces PJI by 0.94% (p=0.027), NNT 106. A total hip arthroplasty (THA) meta-analysis found ALBC reduces PJI by 0.58% (p<0.0001), NNT 172. A hip hemiarthroplasty (HH) RCT found high-dose dual-antibiotic ALBC reduces PJI by 2.35% (p=0.0474), NNT 43. A THA registry report found that cemented fixation compared to ingrowth fixation reduced PFFs by 0.44% (p<0.0001), NNT 229. A pooled analysis of three HH RCTs found that cemented femoral stem fixation reduced PFFs by 5.09% (p-0.0099), NNT 20. Mean PJI treatment costs are $80,000. Mean PFF treatment costs are $27,596. Mean HH cemented femoral stem cost reduction: $685. Using ALBC: TKA margin/case is $755; THA margin/case is $586; and HH margin/case is $3,925. Using plain bone cement: TKA margin/case is $0; THA margin/case is $121; and HH margin/case is $2,065. A broader perspective demonstrates that ALBC provides significant financial margins in TKAs, THAs, and hip hemiarthroplasties. ALBC is cost-effective when including the additional costs of using ALBC in TKAs, THAs, and hip hemiarthroplasties. Hand-mixed ALBC is more cost-effective than pre-mixed ALBC in all scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“In My Experience…15 Data Points To Better Evaluate Platelet Rich Plasma Kits And Protocols” “In My Experience…Mentorship in Orthopaedic Surgery” A New Paradigm in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis and Arthroplasty with Dynamic Patient-source Outcome Measures: Comprehensive Clinical Review of the Knee Kinesiography Exam with the KneeKG® System Latarjet Classics: An Analysis of The 50 Most-Cited Articles on The Latarjet Procedure “In My Experience…Medical Device Design & Innovation in Shoulder Replacements”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1