轻度原发性高血压患者尼群地平20 mg每日1次vs尼卡地平缓释40 mg每日2次:通过24小时动态血压监测评估。

R Fogari, F Tettamanti, A Zoppi, L Poletti, G D Malamani, L Corradi, C Borgnino
{"title":"轻度原发性高血压患者尼群地平20 mg每日1次vs尼卡地平缓释40 mg每日2次:通过24小时动态血压监测评估。","authors":"R Fogari,&nbsp;F Tettamanti,&nbsp;A Zoppi,&nbsp;L Poletti,&nbsp;G D Malamani,&nbsp;L Corradi,&nbsp;C Borgnino","doi":"10.3109/10641969209036209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extent and duration of the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of 20 mg nitrendipine (NIT) once daily and 40 mg nicardipine slow release (NIC) twice daily were compared in 12 men (aged 39-55 years) with mild essential hypertension according to a randomized, cross over study. Twenty-four-hour non invasive ambulatory BP monitoring (Spacelabs 5200) was performed at the end of a 2-week placebo run-in and after 4 weeks of each active treatment; automatic BP measurements were programmed at 15-min intervals. Both treatments significantly (p less than .01) reduced mean 24-hour and daytime systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP, but had different effects on daytime BP profiles. NIT decreased SBP and DBP (p less than .05) in 5 out of 8 two-hour subperiods (from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.), followed by a loss of effect; NIC reduced SBP and DBP (p less than .05) in 7 out of 8 two-hour subperiods (from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m.). During the night-time, NIT reduced mean SBP (p less than .05) and NIC both mean SBP and DBP values (p less than .05; p less than .05 vs NIT for SBP). Heart rate was not affected by either treatment. Thus, after short-term treatment in mild essential hypertensives nitrendipine once daily was not as effective as nicardipine slow release twice daily in reducing blood pressure throughout the 24 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":10339,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice","volume":"14 4","pages":"587-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10641969209036209","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitrendipine 20 mg once daily versus nicardipine slow release 40 mg twice daily in mild essential hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"R Fogari,&nbsp;F Tettamanti,&nbsp;A Zoppi,&nbsp;L Poletti,&nbsp;G D Malamani,&nbsp;L Corradi,&nbsp;C Borgnino\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10641969209036209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The extent and duration of the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of 20 mg nitrendipine (NIT) once daily and 40 mg nicardipine slow release (NIC) twice daily were compared in 12 men (aged 39-55 years) with mild essential hypertension according to a randomized, cross over study. Twenty-four-hour non invasive ambulatory BP monitoring (Spacelabs 5200) was performed at the end of a 2-week placebo run-in and after 4 weeks of each active treatment; automatic BP measurements were programmed at 15-min intervals. Both treatments significantly (p less than .01) reduced mean 24-hour and daytime systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP, but had different effects on daytime BP profiles. NIT decreased SBP and DBP (p less than .05) in 5 out of 8 two-hour subperiods (from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.), followed by a loss of effect; NIC reduced SBP and DBP (p less than .05) in 7 out of 8 two-hour subperiods (from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m.). During the night-time, NIT reduced mean SBP (p less than .05) and NIC both mean SBP and DBP values (p less than .05; p less than .05 vs NIT for SBP). Heart rate was not affected by either treatment. Thus, after short-term treatment in mild essential hypertensives nitrendipine once daily was not as effective as nicardipine slow release twice daily in reducing blood pressure throughout the 24 hours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"587-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10641969209036209\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10641969209036209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10641969209036209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

根据一项随机交叉研究,比较了12名患有轻度原发性高血压的男性(39-55岁)服用20 mg尼群地平(NIT)每日1次和40 mg尼卡地平缓释(NIC)每日2次的降压效果的程度和持续时间。24小时无创动态血压监测(Spacelabs 5200)在2周安慰剂磨合结束后和每次积极治疗4周后进行;每隔15分钟进行自动血压测量。两种治疗均显著(p < 0.01)降低了平均24小时和白天收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP),但对白天血压谱的影响不同。NIT在8个2小时亚时间段(从上午8点到下午6点)中的5个时间段降低了收缩压和舒张压(p < 0.05),随后效果消失;NIC在8个2小时亚时间段(从上午8点到晚上10点)中的7个时间段降低了收缩压和舒张压(p < 0.05)。夜间,NIT降低了平均收缩压(p < 0.05), NIC降低了平均收缩压和舒张压(p < 0.05);与NIT相比,收缩压p < 0.05)。两种治疗均未影响心率。因此,在轻度原发性高血压患者短期治疗后,尼群地平每日一次在24小时内的降压效果不如尼卡地平缓释每日两次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nitrendipine 20 mg once daily versus nicardipine slow release 40 mg twice daily in mild essential hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

The extent and duration of the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of 20 mg nitrendipine (NIT) once daily and 40 mg nicardipine slow release (NIC) twice daily were compared in 12 men (aged 39-55 years) with mild essential hypertension according to a randomized, cross over study. Twenty-four-hour non invasive ambulatory BP monitoring (Spacelabs 5200) was performed at the end of a 2-week placebo run-in and after 4 weeks of each active treatment; automatic BP measurements were programmed at 15-min intervals. Both treatments significantly (p less than .01) reduced mean 24-hour and daytime systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP, but had different effects on daytime BP profiles. NIT decreased SBP and DBP (p less than .05) in 5 out of 8 two-hour subperiods (from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.), followed by a loss of effect; NIC reduced SBP and DBP (p less than .05) in 7 out of 8 two-hour subperiods (from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m.). During the night-time, NIT reduced mean SBP (p less than .05) and NIC both mean SBP and DBP values (p less than .05; p less than .05 vs NIT for SBP). Heart rate was not affected by either treatment. Thus, after short-term treatment in mild essential hypertensives nitrendipine once daily was not as effective as nicardipine slow release twice daily in reducing blood pressure throughout the 24 hours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategies and difficulties in dietary intervention in myocardial infarction patients. Erythrocyte sodium-lithium countertransport in Chinese: its relationship to family history of hypertension. The ouabain-dependent Na(+)-K+ pump and the brain renin-angiotensin system. Effects of immobilization stress on renal sympathetic neurotransmission. ACTH hypertension in the rat: role of sodium chloride.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1