澳大利亚公司派息政策与生命周期理论的检验

J. Coulton, Caitlin M. S. Ruddock
{"title":"澳大利亚公司派息政策与生命周期理论的检验","authors":"J. Coulton, Caitlin M. S. Ruddock","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1567306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide evidence on the frequency and size of corporate payouts by Australian firms, and test whether the life cycle theory explains Australian payout policies. Regular dividends remain the most popular mechanism for distributing cash to shareholders, despite a slight decline in the proportion of dividend payers since the relaxation of buy-back regulations in 1998. Off-market share buy-backs return the largest amount of cash to shareholders. Dividend paying firms are larger, more profitable, and have less growth options that non-dividend paying firms. Consistent with the life cycle theory, we observe a highly significant relation between the decision to pay regular dividends and the proportion of shareholders’ equity that is earned rather than contributed.","PeriodicalId":340291,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Payout Policy in Australia and a Test of the Life Cycle Theory\",\"authors\":\"J. Coulton, Caitlin M. S. Ruddock\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1567306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We provide evidence on the frequency and size of corporate payouts by Australian firms, and test whether the life cycle theory explains Australian payout policies. Regular dividends remain the most popular mechanism for distributing cash to shareholders, despite a slight decline in the proportion of dividend payers since the relaxation of buy-back regulations in 1998. Off-market share buy-backs return the largest amount of cash to shareholders. Dividend paying firms are larger, more profitable, and have less growth options that non-dividend paying firms. Consistent with the life cycle theory, we observe a highly significant relation between the decision to pay regular dividends and the proportion of shareholders’ equity that is earned rather than contributed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1567306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1567306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们提供了澳大利亚公司派息频率和规模的证据,并检验生命周期理论是否解释了澳大利亚派息政策。定期派息仍是向股东派发现金的最受欢迎的机制,尽管自1998年回购规定放松以来,派息者的比例略有下降。场外股票回购是向股东返还最多现金的方式。与不分红的公司相比,分红公司规模更大,利润更高,增长机会更少。与生命周期理论一致,我们观察到支付定期股息的决定与股东权益中赚取而不是贡献的比例之间存在高度显著的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate Payout Policy in Australia and a Test of the Life Cycle Theory
We provide evidence on the frequency and size of corporate payouts by Australian firms, and test whether the life cycle theory explains Australian payout policies. Regular dividends remain the most popular mechanism for distributing cash to shareholders, despite a slight decline in the proportion of dividend payers since the relaxation of buy-back regulations in 1998. Off-market share buy-backs return the largest amount of cash to shareholders. Dividend paying firms are larger, more profitable, and have less growth options that non-dividend paying firms. Consistent with the life cycle theory, we observe a highly significant relation between the decision to pay regular dividends and the proportion of shareholders’ equity that is earned rather than contributed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information Asymmetry and Corporate Cash Holdings Employer Learning, Productivity and the Earnings Distribution: Evidence from Performance Measures On the Determinants of Firm Leverage: Evidence from a Structural Estimation Underwriter Relationships and Shelf Offerings Do Parents Matter? Effects of Lender Affiliation through the Mortgage Boom and Bust
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1