使用各种预训练模型检测急性淋巴母细胞白血病(ALL)的淋巴母细胞分类计算机辅助系统(CAS)

Syadia Nabilah Mohd Safuan, Mohd Razali Md Tomari, W. Zakaria, N. Othman, N. S. Suriani
{"title":"使用各种预训练模型检测急性淋巴母细胞白血病(ALL)的淋巴母细胞分类计算机辅助系统(CAS)","authors":"Syadia Nabilah Mohd Safuan, Mohd Razali Md Tomari, W. Zakaria, N. Othman, N. S. Suriani","doi":"10.1109/SCOReD50371.2020.9251000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer Aided System (CAS) is an automated, fast and accurate approach for detection and classification purposes. It is used to help experts or medical practitioner as a second opinion to analyze the blood smear image. It is done manually by some practitioners but it is time consuming and creates confusion as different pathologists give different observations and results as it is highly dependent on the experts’ skills. Other than that, it is also challenging to analyze it manually as there are thousands of images. Some researchers used CAS by applying the machine learning to classify the data. However, significant features must be known before proceeding with classification process. In this paper, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is applied to classify the WBC types to identify Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). It is a better approach as no complex features need to be designed and it is a fast response program. Pre-trained models of deep learning which are AlexNet, GoogleNet and VGG-16 are compared to each other to find the model that can classify better. There are 260 images in IDB-2 database and 242 images in LISC database. Five types of WBC are classified for LISC database while for IDB-2 database, Lymphoblast and Non-Lymphoblast is classified specifically. As a result, for both database, AlexNet achieve the best result in terms of the training and testing accuracy for each class. Training accuracy for IDB-2 is 96.15% while testing accuracy for Lymphoblast and Non-Lymphoblast is 97.74% and 95.29% respectively. Training accuracy by AlexNet for LISC is 80.82% and testing accuracy is the highest for each class except Monocyte. Overall, AlexNet works better than the other two models for classification for both databases.","PeriodicalId":142867,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer Aided System (CAS) Of Lymphoblast Classification For Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Detection Using Various Pre-Trained Models\",\"authors\":\"Syadia Nabilah Mohd Safuan, Mohd Razali Md Tomari, W. Zakaria, N. Othman, N. S. Suriani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SCOReD50371.2020.9251000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computer Aided System (CAS) is an automated, fast and accurate approach for detection and classification purposes. It is used to help experts or medical practitioner as a second opinion to analyze the blood smear image. It is done manually by some practitioners but it is time consuming and creates confusion as different pathologists give different observations and results as it is highly dependent on the experts’ skills. Other than that, it is also challenging to analyze it manually as there are thousands of images. Some researchers used CAS by applying the machine learning to classify the data. However, significant features must be known before proceeding with classification process. In this paper, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is applied to classify the WBC types to identify Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). It is a better approach as no complex features need to be designed and it is a fast response program. Pre-trained models of deep learning which are AlexNet, GoogleNet and VGG-16 are compared to each other to find the model that can classify better. There are 260 images in IDB-2 database and 242 images in LISC database. Five types of WBC are classified for LISC database while for IDB-2 database, Lymphoblast and Non-Lymphoblast is classified specifically. As a result, for both database, AlexNet achieve the best result in terms of the training and testing accuracy for each class. Training accuracy for IDB-2 is 96.15% while testing accuracy for Lymphoblast and Non-Lymphoblast is 97.74% and 95.29% respectively. Training accuracy by AlexNet for LISC is 80.82% and testing accuracy is the highest for each class except Monocyte. Overall, AlexNet works better than the other two models for classification for both databases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCOReD50371.2020.9251000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCOReD50371.2020.9251000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

计算机辅助系统(CAS)是一种自动化、快速和准确的检测和分类方法。它是用来帮助专家或医生作为第二意见来分析血液涂片图像。它是由一些从业者手工完成的,但它是耗时的,并且由于不同的病理学家给出不同的观察和结果而造成混乱,因为它高度依赖于专家的技能。除此之外,人工分析也很有挑战性,因为有成千上万的图像。一些研究人员通过应用机器学习对数据进行分类来使用CAS。然而,在进行分类过程之前,必须了解重要的特征。本文采用卷积神经网络(Convolutional Neural Network, CNN)对白细胞类型进行分类,鉴别急性淋巴细胞白血病(Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, ALL)。这是一个更好的方法,因为不需要设计复杂的功能,它是一个快速响应程序。通过对深度学习预训练模型AlexNet、GoogleNet和VGG-16进行对比,找出分类效果更好的模型。IDB-2数据库有260幅图像,LISC数据库有242幅图像。LISC数据库将白细胞分为五种类型,而IDB-2数据库则将白细胞分为淋巴母细胞和非淋巴母细胞。因此,对于这两个数据库,AlexNet在每个类的训练和测试准确率方面都取得了最好的结果。IDB-2的训练准确率为96.15%,淋巴母细胞和非淋巴母细胞的检测准确率分别为97.74%和95.29%。AlexNet对LISC的训练准确率为80.82%,除Monocyte外,其他类别的测试准确率最高。总的来说,AlexNet在这两个数据库的分类方面都比其他两个模型要好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computer Aided System (CAS) Of Lymphoblast Classification For Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Detection Using Various Pre-Trained Models
Computer Aided System (CAS) is an automated, fast and accurate approach for detection and classification purposes. It is used to help experts or medical practitioner as a second opinion to analyze the blood smear image. It is done manually by some practitioners but it is time consuming and creates confusion as different pathologists give different observations and results as it is highly dependent on the experts’ skills. Other than that, it is also challenging to analyze it manually as there are thousands of images. Some researchers used CAS by applying the machine learning to classify the data. However, significant features must be known before proceeding with classification process. In this paper, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is applied to classify the WBC types to identify Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). It is a better approach as no complex features need to be designed and it is a fast response program. Pre-trained models of deep learning which are AlexNet, GoogleNet and VGG-16 are compared to each other to find the model that can classify better. There are 260 images in IDB-2 database and 242 images in LISC database. Five types of WBC are classified for LISC database while for IDB-2 database, Lymphoblast and Non-Lymphoblast is classified specifically. As a result, for both database, AlexNet achieve the best result in terms of the training and testing accuracy for each class. Training accuracy for IDB-2 is 96.15% while testing accuracy for Lymphoblast and Non-Lymphoblast is 97.74% and 95.29% respectively. Training accuracy by AlexNet for LISC is 80.82% and testing accuracy is the highest for each class except Monocyte. Overall, AlexNet works better than the other two models for classification for both databases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Performance of Smart Inverter Functionalities in PV-Rich LV Distribution Networks Simulation of Temporal Correlation Detection using HfO2-Based ReRAM Arrays Design and Development of a Quadcopter for Landmine Detection A Waste Recycling System for a Better Living World Study for Microstrip Patch Antenna for 5G Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1