单方拒绝租赁协议:理论与实践

D. Polnyi
{"title":"单方拒绝租赁协议:理论与实践","authors":"D. Polnyi","doi":"10.15330/apiclu.54.45-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the unilateral refusal of a lease agreement as a way of self-defence of the tenant's and landlord's rights. The author expresses an opinion that unilateral refusal of a lease agreement by the tenant or landlord in cases provided by law or the agreement itself as a consequence of violation of the terms of a lease agreement should be considered is a sanction for illegal behavior of the parties of the agreement. \nThe author notes that unilateral refusal of a lease agreement in case of breaching the agreement by the other party should not be equated to termination of a lease agreement at the request of one of the parties. They are independent grounds for termination of the agreement, which are characterized by a different mechanism of implementation, for example, the termination of a lease agreement at the request of one of the parties is always carried out in court. \nThe analysis of case law shows that in order to be able unilaterally refuse from the lease agreement, when concluding an agreement it is necessary to state with a due precision the grounds for unilateral refusal for each party to the agreement. \nThe author draws the conclusion that the simplified mechanism of unilateral refusal of a lease agreement should include two general stages: the emergence of grounds for unilateral refusal, and proper notification of the other party about the refusal of the agreement.","PeriodicalId":196689,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unilateral Refusal Of A Lease Agreement: Theoretical And Practical Aspects\",\"authors\":\"D. Polnyi\",\"doi\":\"10.15330/apiclu.54.45-55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the unilateral refusal of a lease agreement as a way of self-defence of the tenant's and landlord's rights. The author expresses an opinion that unilateral refusal of a lease agreement by the tenant or landlord in cases provided by law or the agreement itself as a consequence of violation of the terms of a lease agreement should be considered is a sanction for illegal behavior of the parties of the agreement. \\nThe author notes that unilateral refusal of a lease agreement in case of breaching the agreement by the other party should not be equated to termination of a lease agreement at the request of one of the parties. They are independent grounds for termination of the agreement, which are characterized by a different mechanism of implementation, for example, the termination of a lease agreement at the request of one of the parties is always carried out in court. \\nThe analysis of case law shows that in order to be able unilaterally refuse from the lease agreement, when concluding an agreement it is necessary to state with a due precision the grounds for unilateral refusal for each party to the agreement. \\nThe author draws the conclusion that the simplified mechanism of unilateral refusal of a lease agreement should include two general stages: the emergence of grounds for unilateral refusal, and proper notification of the other party about the refusal of the agreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.54.45-55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.54.45-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了单方拒绝租赁协议作为房客和房东权利自卫的一种方式。笔者认为,在法律或协议本身规定的情况下,承租人或房东因违反租赁协议条款而单方面拒绝租赁协议,应视为对协议当事人违法行为的一种制裁。发件人指出,在另一方违反协议的情况下,单方面拒绝租赁协议不应等同于应一方当事人的要求终止租赁协议。它们是协议终止的独立理由,其特点是执行机制不同,例如,应一方当事人的要求终止租赁协议总是在法院进行。判例法分析表明,为了能够单方面拒绝租赁协议,在签订协议时,有必要对协议各方单方面拒绝的理由进行适当的准确陈述。笔者认为,简化的租赁合同单方拒绝机制应包括两个一般阶段:单方拒绝理由的出现和适当通知对方拒绝协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unilateral Refusal Of A Lease Agreement: Theoretical And Practical Aspects
The article deals with the unilateral refusal of a lease agreement as a way of self-defence of the tenant's and landlord's rights. The author expresses an opinion that unilateral refusal of a lease agreement by the tenant or landlord in cases provided by law or the agreement itself as a consequence of violation of the terms of a lease agreement should be considered is a sanction for illegal behavior of the parties of the agreement. The author notes that unilateral refusal of a lease agreement in case of breaching the agreement by the other party should not be equated to termination of a lease agreement at the request of one of the parties. They are independent grounds for termination of the agreement, which are characterized by a different mechanism of implementation, for example, the termination of a lease agreement at the request of one of the parties is always carried out in court. The analysis of case law shows that in order to be able unilaterally refuse from the lease agreement, when concluding an agreement it is necessary to state with a due precision the grounds for unilateral refusal for each party to the agreement. The author draws the conclusion that the simplified mechanism of unilateral refusal of a lease agreement should include two general stages: the emergence of grounds for unilateral refusal, and proper notification of the other party about the refusal of the agreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidential activity of the court in civil and administrative proceedings: a comparative legal analysis The influence of jurisprudence of international treaty bodies on the interpretation of international treaties Administrative and legal mechanisms for ensuring the safety of the educational process in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine Simplified proceedings in the civil procedure of Poland Consideration of family cases by the court according to the rules of simplified litigation: a review of judicial practice and trends of change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1