比较视角下的印尼经济表现及2049年的新政策框架

C. Hong, W. Woo
{"title":"比较视角下的印尼经济表现及2049年的新政策框架","authors":"C. Hong, W. Woo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1533134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia began its war for economic development in 1949 after winning the war for political independence that started in 1945. This is a speculative paper because it is the exploratory paper of the planned Indonesia 2049 project which asks whether Indonesia’s war on economic development would be won after one hundred years. We compared various dimensions of Indonesia’s economy with those of two oil exporters (Mexico and Nigeria), three large populous developing economies (Brazil, China and India) and three Southeast Asian neighbors (Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand). Indonesia’s post-1965 economic performance was very good when compared with its own pre-1965 period, was above average when compared with the other eight countries, and was slightly below average when compared with the East Asian economies. Our tentative conclusion is that a new economic policy framework should be adopted in the second SBY administration to ensure that Indonesia in 2049 would be close to achieving the dreams of the Generasi 1945. This new policy framework must go beyond the twin Washington Consensus prescriptions of “getting prices right�? and “getting institutions right�? to include actions like “getting the role of science right�? and “getting the conception of the reform process right�?.","PeriodicalId":213755,"journal":{"name":"International Environment of Global Business eJournal","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indonesia’s Economic Performance in Comparative Perspective, and a New Policy Framework for 2049\",\"authors\":\"C. Hong, W. Woo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1533134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indonesia began its war for economic development in 1949 after winning the war for political independence that started in 1945. This is a speculative paper because it is the exploratory paper of the planned Indonesia 2049 project which asks whether Indonesia’s war on economic development would be won after one hundred years. We compared various dimensions of Indonesia’s economy with those of two oil exporters (Mexico and Nigeria), three large populous developing economies (Brazil, China and India) and three Southeast Asian neighbors (Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand). Indonesia’s post-1965 economic performance was very good when compared with its own pre-1965 period, was above average when compared with the other eight countries, and was slightly below average when compared with the East Asian economies. Our tentative conclusion is that a new economic policy framework should be adopted in the second SBY administration to ensure that Indonesia in 2049 would be close to achieving the dreams of the Generasi 1945. This new policy framework must go beyond the twin Washington Consensus prescriptions of “getting prices right�? and “getting institutions right�? to include actions like “getting the role of science right�? and “getting the conception of the reform process right�?.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Environment of Global Business eJournal\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Environment of Global Business eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1533134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Environment of Global Business eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1533134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

印度尼西亚在1945年赢得政治独立战争后,于1949年开始了经济发展战争。这是一篇投机性的论文,因为它是计划中的印度尼西亚2049项目的探索性论文,该项目询问印度尼西亚在一百年后的经济发展战争中是否会获胜。我们将印尼经济的各个方面与两个石油出口国(墨西哥和尼日利亚)、三个人口众多的发展中经济体(巴西、中国和印度)以及三个东南亚邻国(马来西亚、菲律宾和泰国)的经济进行了比较。与1965年以前相比,印度尼西亚1965年后的经济表现非常好,与其他八个国家相比高于平均水平,与东亚经济体相比略低于平均水平。我们的初步结论是,新的经济政策框架应该在第二届苏西政府中采用,以确保2049年的印度尼西亚将接近实现1945年的梦想。这个新的政策框架必须超越“华盛顿共识”(Washington Consensus)的两大处方——“合理定价”。“让制度正确?”包括“正确发挥科学的作用”这样的行动?以及“正确理解改革进程”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indonesia’s Economic Performance in Comparative Perspective, and a New Policy Framework for 2049
Indonesia began its war for economic development in 1949 after winning the war for political independence that started in 1945. This is a speculative paper because it is the exploratory paper of the planned Indonesia 2049 project which asks whether Indonesia’s war on economic development would be won after one hundred years. We compared various dimensions of Indonesia’s economy with those of two oil exporters (Mexico and Nigeria), three large populous developing economies (Brazil, China and India) and three Southeast Asian neighbors (Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand). Indonesia’s post-1965 economic performance was very good when compared with its own pre-1965 period, was above average when compared with the other eight countries, and was slightly below average when compared with the East Asian economies. Our tentative conclusion is that a new economic policy framework should be adopted in the second SBY administration to ensure that Indonesia in 2049 would be close to achieving the dreams of the Generasi 1945. This new policy framework must go beyond the twin Washington Consensus prescriptions of “getting prices right�? and “getting institutions right�? to include actions like “getting the role of science right�? and “getting the conception of the reform process right�?.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corporate Governance in Macedonia - Micro and Macro Analysis Applicability of Minimum Alternate Tax in India An Analysis of Asset-Liability Management in Indian Banks The Future of Chinese Growth Risk Transfer Through Commodity Derivatives: A Study of Soyabean Oil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1