竞争不是别人的工作!

T. Kippenberger
{"title":"竞争不是别人的工作!","authors":"T. Kippenberger","doi":"10.1108/EUM0000000006860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Records that most mergers and acquisitions fail to deliver shareholder value and not much attention is paid to more mundane reality matters meaning loss of priority in important matters. States resource‐based views of strategy highlights the fact that competitive advantage lies not in products or services but in resources and intangible capabilities which produce them.","PeriodicalId":178456,"journal":{"name":"The Antidote","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competition isn’t someone else’s job!\",\"authors\":\"T. Kippenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/EUM0000000006860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Records that most mergers and acquisitions fail to deliver shareholder value and not much attention is paid to more mundane reality matters meaning loss of priority in important matters. States resource‐based views of strategy highlights the fact that competitive advantage lies not in products or services but in resources and intangible capabilities which produce them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Antidote\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Antidote\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Antidote","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

记录显示,大多数并购交易未能为股东带来价值,而且对更平凡的现实问题没有给予太多关注,这意味着在重要问题上失去了优先级。国家以资源为基础的战略观点强调了这样一个事实,即竞争优势不在于产品或服务,而在于生产它们的资源和无形能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competition isn’t someone else’s job!
Records that most mergers and acquisitions fail to deliver shareholder value and not much attention is paid to more mundane reality matters meaning loss of priority in important matters. States resource‐based views of strategy highlights the fact that competitive advantage lies not in products or services but in resources and intangible capabilities which produce them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Change that can kill off great, well‐run companies What does it mean to be flexible Two contrasting theories of change: Theory E and Theory O Change just won’t go away The gap between rhetoric and reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1