最高法院的起源

Dickson Brice
{"title":"最高法院的起源","authors":"Dickson Brice","doi":"10.1093/LAW/9780198793731.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides relevant historical context by explaining how Southern Ireland broke away from the United Kingdom in 1922 and became a Dominion under the name of the Irish Free State. It describes how the court system developed before and after the partition of Ireland, focusing on the transition from the Dáil Éireann courts to the proposals in the report of the Judiciary Committee in 1923, which led to the Courts of Justice Act 1924. The nature of the proposed Supreme Court of Ireland is compared with that of Supreme Courts in other dominions at that time, with particular regard to the judicial power to subject legislation to constitutional review. Despite references to Canada in the Irish Free State’s Constitution, few lessons were drawn from the experience of Canada’s Supreme Court or any other top national court.","PeriodicalId":251482,"journal":{"name":"The Irish Supreme Court","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2 The Origins of the Supreme Court\",\"authors\":\"Dickson Brice\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/LAW/9780198793731.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter provides relevant historical context by explaining how Southern Ireland broke away from the United Kingdom in 1922 and became a Dominion under the name of the Irish Free State. It describes how the court system developed before and after the partition of Ireland, focusing on the transition from the Dáil Éireann courts to the proposals in the report of the Judiciary Committee in 1923, which led to the Courts of Justice Act 1924. The nature of the proposed Supreme Court of Ireland is compared with that of Supreme Courts in other dominions at that time, with particular regard to the judicial power to subject legislation to constitutional review. Despite references to Canada in the Irish Free State’s Constitution, few lessons were drawn from the experience of Canada’s Supreme Court or any other top national court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Irish Supreme Court\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Irish Supreme Court\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/LAW/9780198793731.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Irish Supreme Court","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LAW/9780198793731.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章提供了相关的历史背景,解释了南爱尔兰是如何在1922年脱离联合王国,并以爱尔兰自由邦的名义成为一个自治领的。它描述了法院系统在爱尔兰分治前后的发展情况,重点是从Dáil Éireann法院过渡到1923年司法委员会报告中的建议,这导致了1924年《法院法》。将拟议中的爱尔兰最高法院的性质与当时其他领土的最高法院的性质作了比较,特别是在使立法接受宪法审查的司法权方面。尽管爱尔兰自由邦宪法中提到了加拿大,但几乎没有从加拿大最高法院或任何其他国家最高法院的经验中吸取教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2 The Origins of the Supreme Court
This chapter provides relevant historical context by explaining how Southern Ireland broke away from the United Kingdom in 1922 and became a Dominion under the name of the Irish Free State. It describes how the court system developed before and after the partition of Ireland, focusing on the transition from the Dáil Éireann courts to the proposals in the report of the Judiciary Committee in 1923, which led to the Courts of Justice Act 1924. The nature of the proposed Supreme Court of Ireland is compared with that of Supreme Courts in other dominions at that time, with particular regard to the judicial power to subject legislation to constitutional review. Despite references to Canada in the Irish Free State’s Constitution, few lessons were drawn from the experience of Canada’s Supreme Court or any other top national court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
7 The Supreme Court and Northern Ireland 13 Conclusion 11 The Supreme Court and the European Union 8 Administrative Law 4 The Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1