金融服务领域的不对称优势与妥协效应

E. Teppan, A. Felfernig
{"title":"金融服务领域的不对称优势与妥协效应","authors":"E. Teppan, A. Felfernig","doi":"10.1109/CEC.2009.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recommender systems help customers toidentify products which fulfill certain requirements.Many different approaches have been developed andwork well for different domains. What has been ignoredso far is the fact that psychological phenomena can resultin suboptimal decision taking on recommender resultpages. This paper presents a user study investigating theAsymmetric Dominance Effect and the CompromiseEffect in the domain of financial services. The empiricalfindings are compared with the calculations of the SimpleDominance Model which serves as a model foridentification and explanation of such effects.Furthermore, we show how to identify misleading effectson recommender result pages, and how to correctproduct perception such that the felt utility reflects theutility calculated by recommender systems.","PeriodicalId":384060,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetric Dominance- and Compromise Effects in the Financial Services Domain\",\"authors\":\"E. Teppan, A. Felfernig\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEC.2009.69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recommender systems help customers toidentify products which fulfill certain requirements.Many different approaches have been developed andwork well for different domains. What has been ignoredso far is the fact that psychological phenomena can resultin suboptimal decision taking on recommender resultpages. This paper presents a user study investigating theAsymmetric Dominance Effect and the CompromiseEffect in the domain of financial services. The empiricalfindings are compared with the calculations of the SimpleDominance Model which serves as a model foridentification and explanation of such effects.Furthermore, we show how to identify misleading effectson recommender result pages, and how to correctproduct perception such that the felt utility reflects theutility calculated by recommender systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2009.69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2009.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

推荐系统帮助客户识别满足特定要求的产品。已经开发了许多不同的方法,并在不同的领域发挥了良好的作用。到目前为止,被忽视的事实是,心理现象可能导致在推荐结果页面上做出次优决策。本文提出了一项用户研究,探讨了金融服务领域的不对称优势效应和妥协效应。实证结果与SimpleDominance模型的计算结果进行了比较,SimpleDominance模型是识别和解释这种效应的模型。此外,我们展示了如何识别推荐结果页面中的误导效应,以及如何纠正产品感知,使感觉效用反映推荐系统计算的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Asymmetric Dominance- and Compromise Effects in the Financial Services Domain
Recommender systems help customers toidentify products which fulfill certain requirements.Many different approaches have been developed andwork well for different domains. What has been ignoredso far is the fact that psychological phenomena can resultin suboptimal decision taking on recommender resultpages. This paper presents a user study investigating theAsymmetric Dominance Effect and the CompromiseEffect in the domain of financial services. The empiricalfindings are compared with the calculations of the SimpleDominance Model which serves as a model foridentification and explanation of such effects.Furthermore, we show how to identify misleading effectson recommender result pages, and how to correctproduct perception such that the felt utility reflects theutility calculated by recommender systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web-Based Process Portals: Powering Business Process Management within Large Organisations Time-BPMN Process Mining of RFID-Based Supply Chains SARI-SQL: Event Query Language for Event Analysis Decision-Support for Optimizing Supply Chain Formation Based on CSET Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1