重新构想法律能力与能力方法之间的关系

Dawn Watkins
{"title":"重新构想法律能力与能力方法之间的关系","authors":"Dawn Watkins","doi":"10.19164/ijple.v5i1.1082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the literature on public legal education and legal capability, it is commonly stated that the concept of legal capability is closely related to the capabilities approach.  This paper critically examines the nature of this relationship and in Part I seeks to demonstrate that whilst they share some broad affinity, the relationship between legal capability and the capabilities approach is currently disparate in both conceptual and practical terms.  In Part II, the paper goes on to consider what might happen if this relationship is reimagined and the two fields brought closer together.  Aspects of this reimagining are considered in turn under three headings: emphasising choice and opportunity, broadening perspective and promoting participatory approaches.   The paper concludes by summarising the potential advantages and disadvantages of this proposed reimagining, and by raising questions as to whether the implications of establishing a closer relationship between legal capability and the capabilities approach warrant further exploration, or whether it is preferable for the distance to be maintained. ","PeriodicalId":332351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Legal Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reimagining the relationship between Legal Capability and the Capabilities Approach\",\"authors\":\"Dawn Watkins\",\"doi\":\"10.19164/ijple.v5i1.1082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the literature on public legal education and legal capability, it is commonly stated that the concept of legal capability is closely related to the capabilities approach.  This paper critically examines the nature of this relationship and in Part I seeks to demonstrate that whilst they share some broad affinity, the relationship between legal capability and the capabilities approach is currently disparate in both conceptual and practical terms.  In Part II, the paper goes on to consider what might happen if this relationship is reimagined and the two fields brought closer together.  Aspects of this reimagining are considered in turn under three headings: emphasising choice and opportunity, broadening perspective and promoting participatory approaches.   The paper concludes by summarising the potential advantages and disadvantages of this proposed reimagining, and by raising questions as to whether the implications of establishing a closer relationship between legal capability and the capabilities approach warrant further exploration, or whether it is preferable for the distance to be maintained. \",\"PeriodicalId\":332351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Legal Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Legal Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19164/ijple.v5i1.1082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/ijple.v5i1.1082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在关于公共法律教育和法律能力的文献中,通常认为法律能力的概念与能力方法密切相关。本文批判性地考察了这种关系的本质,并在第一部分中试图证明,虽然它们具有广泛的亲和力,但法律能力和能力方法之间的关系目前在概念和实践方面都是不同的。在第二部分中,本文继续考虑如果这种关系被重新想象,两个领域更紧密地联系在一起,可能会发生什么。这种重新构想的各个方面依次在三个标题下进行审议:强调选择和机会、扩大视野和促进参与性方法。最后,本文总结了这种重新构想的潜在优点和缺点,并提出了以下问题:在法律能力和能力方法之间建立更密切关系的影响是否值得进一步探讨,或者保持这种距离是否更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reimagining the relationship between Legal Capability and the Capabilities Approach
Within the literature on public legal education and legal capability, it is commonly stated that the concept of legal capability is closely related to the capabilities approach.  This paper critically examines the nature of this relationship and in Part I seeks to demonstrate that whilst they share some broad affinity, the relationship between legal capability and the capabilities approach is currently disparate in both conceptual and practical terms.  In Part II, the paper goes on to consider what might happen if this relationship is reimagined and the two fields brought closer together.  Aspects of this reimagining are considered in turn under three headings: emphasising choice and opportunity, broadening perspective and promoting participatory approaches.   The paper concludes by summarising the potential advantages and disadvantages of this proposed reimagining, and by raising questions as to whether the implications of establishing a closer relationship between legal capability and the capabilities approach warrant further exploration, or whether it is preferable for the distance to be maintained. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
UK and Ireland Street Law Conference 2022 Review The Art of Adapting Open Educational Resources for Street Law: Copyright the Card Game a Case Study The Journey To Legal Capability: Challenges for Public Law from Public Legal Education From the Field: Law-Related Education as a Branch of Civics Education in the United States The Power of Teaching Police through the Prism of Human Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1