卡夫食品收购吉百利公司后社会责任实践价值的反思:对欧盟收购指令修订的启示

G. Tsagas
{"title":"卡夫食品收购吉百利公司后社会责任实践价值的反思:对欧盟收购指令修订的启示","authors":"G. Tsagas","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2083451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The takeover of Cadbury’s plc by US multinational Kraft in 2010 led to the questioning of the UK’s open market for corporate control and brought stakeholders’ interests, corporations’ long-term growth and CSR practices in the spotlight. Reference to the Cadbury’s takeover as a paradigm will suggest that the reform of the UK Takeover Rules in 2011 in favor of a more long-term stakeholder interpretation of the rules is likely to have an impact on the potential revision of the equivalent EU Rules in time to come. The article begins by analyzing the European Commission’s 2011 definition of the term CSR. Following, it outlines the stakeholder focused provisions found in the EU Takeover Directive and identifies ambiguous concepts, as well as legal gaps in relation to protecting corporate interests, including those of stakeholders’. The article identifies factors, such as non-available information on CSR in the share price and directors’ corporate strategies guided by stockholders short-term interests, that impact negatively on the desired symbiosis of takeovers and CSR. Along these lines and in considering the need for legal certainty and the need to address market failures, a ‘stakeholder friendly’ reform of the Directive’s provisions is proposed. The final part of the paper proposes specific amendments to the EU Takeover Directive and takes into account data from a preliminary brief overview of ‘The Study’ on the application of the EU Takeover Directive presented by Marcuus Partners in 09.11 and from the Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Expert Survey Report on the ‘Reform of EU Takeover Directive and of German Takeover Law’, dated 11.11.","PeriodicalId":117639,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Takeover Law (Topic)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflecting on the Value of Socially Responsible Practices Post Takeover of Cadbury’s Plc by Kraft Foods Inc: Implications for the Revision of the EU Takeover Directive\",\"authors\":\"G. Tsagas\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2083451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The takeover of Cadbury’s plc by US multinational Kraft in 2010 led to the questioning of the UK’s open market for corporate control and brought stakeholders’ interests, corporations’ long-term growth and CSR practices in the spotlight. Reference to the Cadbury’s takeover as a paradigm will suggest that the reform of the UK Takeover Rules in 2011 in favor of a more long-term stakeholder interpretation of the rules is likely to have an impact on the potential revision of the equivalent EU Rules in time to come. The article begins by analyzing the European Commission’s 2011 definition of the term CSR. Following, it outlines the stakeholder focused provisions found in the EU Takeover Directive and identifies ambiguous concepts, as well as legal gaps in relation to protecting corporate interests, including those of stakeholders’. The article identifies factors, such as non-available information on CSR in the share price and directors’ corporate strategies guided by stockholders short-term interests, that impact negatively on the desired symbiosis of takeovers and CSR. Along these lines and in considering the need for legal certainty and the need to address market failures, a ‘stakeholder friendly’ reform of the Directive’s provisions is proposed. The final part of the paper proposes specific amendments to the EU Takeover Directive and takes into account data from a preliminary brief overview of ‘The Study’ on the application of the EU Takeover Directive presented by Marcuus Partners in 09.11 and from the Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Expert Survey Report on the ‘Reform of EU Takeover Directive and of German Takeover Law’, dated 11.11.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Takeover Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Takeover Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2083451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Takeover Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2083451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

2010年,美国跨国公司卡夫(Kraft)收购吉百利公司(Cadbury ' s plc)引发了对英国企业控制权开放市场的质疑,并使利益相关者的利益、企业的长期增长和企业社会责任实践成为人们关注的焦点。以吉百利收购为例,将表明2011年英国收购规则的改革有利于更长期的利益相关者对规则的解释,这可能会对未来相应的欧盟规则的潜在修订产生影响。本文首先分析了欧盟委员会2011年对企业社会责任一词的定义。接下来,它概述了欧盟收购指令中以利益相关者为中心的条款,并确定了模糊的概念,以及与保护公司利益(包括利益相关者的利益)相关的法律空白。本文确定了一些因素,如股价中关于企业社会责任的信息不可获得以及董事在股东短期利益指导下的公司战略,这些因素对收购与企业社会责任的理想共生产生了负面影响。沿着这些思路,考虑到法律确定性的需要和解决市场失灵的需要,建议对该指令的条款进行“利益相关者友好”的改革。论文的最后一部分提出了对欧盟收购指令的具体修订,并考虑了马库斯合伙人于9.11年提交的关于欧盟收购指令应用的“研究”的初步简要概述和11月11日关于“欧盟收购指令和德国收购法改革”的富而德Bruckhaus Deringer专家调查报告中的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reflecting on the Value of Socially Responsible Practices Post Takeover of Cadbury’s Plc by Kraft Foods Inc: Implications for the Revision of the EU Takeover Directive
The takeover of Cadbury’s plc by US multinational Kraft in 2010 led to the questioning of the UK’s open market for corporate control and brought stakeholders’ interests, corporations’ long-term growth and CSR practices in the spotlight. Reference to the Cadbury’s takeover as a paradigm will suggest that the reform of the UK Takeover Rules in 2011 in favor of a more long-term stakeholder interpretation of the rules is likely to have an impact on the potential revision of the equivalent EU Rules in time to come. The article begins by analyzing the European Commission’s 2011 definition of the term CSR. Following, it outlines the stakeholder focused provisions found in the EU Takeover Directive and identifies ambiguous concepts, as well as legal gaps in relation to protecting corporate interests, including those of stakeholders’. The article identifies factors, such as non-available information on CSR in the share price and directors’ corporate strategies guided by stockholders short-term interests, that impact negatively on the desired symbiosis of takeovers and CSR. Along these lines and in considering the need for legal certainty and the need to address market failures, a ‘stakeholder friendly’ reform of the Directive’s provisions is proposed. The final part of the paper proposes specific amendments to the EU Takeover Directive and takes into account data from a preliminary brief overview of ‘The Study’ on the application of the EU Takeover Directive presented by Marcuus Partners in 09.11 and from the Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Expert Survey Report on the ‘Reform of EU Takeover Directive and of German Takeover Law’, dated 11.11.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Competition Laws and Earnings Management: International Evidence Deal Structure Takeover Bids’ Profile Under Mandatory Bid Rule: Evidence from an Emerging Market Speed in Decision-Making: An Assessment of the Australian Takeovers Panel Takeover Litigation in 2014
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1