重钻立井开挖中钻孔立井基础坍塌后的响应

M. Race, R. Coffman
{"title":"重钻立井开挖中钻孔立井基础坍塌后的响应","authors":"M. Race, R. Coffman","doi":"10.1179/1937525515Y.0000000003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two drilled shaft foundations (DSFs) of equal size (1.2 m diameter) were installed at the Turrell Arkansas Test Site (TATS). The soil stratigraphy at the TATS consisted of 6.1 m of clay underlain by 3.0 m of silt underlain by sand. After drilling the excavation for the North 1.2 m DSF, the silty soil collapsed from the sidewall of the excavation into the bottom of the excavation. Following the collapse, the excavation was redrilled and the construction of the DSF was completed. The measured capacity, unit side resistance, and end bearing resistance of the South 1.2 m diameter DSF were predicted by using software programs and mean values of soil data. The measured response of the North 1.2 m diameter DSF was backward modeled to determine the appropriate strength and stress reduction. Based on the measured data for this site, a 10 percent reduction in unit weight within the silt layer and a modification of the soil properties within the top 3.0 m of the sand layer produced predicted responses that matched the measured responses.","PeriodicalId":272645,"journal":{"name":"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of a drilled shaft foundation constructed in a redrilled shaft excavation following collapse\",\"authors\":\"M. Race, R. Coffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/1937525515Y.0000000003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two drilled shaft foundations (DSFs) of equal size (1.2 m diameter) were installed at the Turrell Arkansas Test Site (TATS). The soil stratigraphy at the TATS consisted of 6.1 m of clay underlain by 3.0 m of silt underlain by sand. After drilling the excavation for the North 1.2 m DSF, the silty soil collapsed from the sidewall of the excavation into the bottom of the excavation. Following the collapse, the excavation was redrilled and the construction of the DSF was completed. The measured capacity, unit side resistance, and end bearing resistance of the South 1.2 m diameter DSF were predicted by using software programs and mean values of soil data. The measured response of the North 1.2 m diameter DSF was backward modeled to determine the appropriate strength and stress reduction. Based on the measured data for this site, a 10 percent reduction in unit weight within the silt layer and a modification of the soil properties within the top 3.0 m of the sand layer produced predicted responses that matched the measured responses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/1937525515Y.0000000003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1937525515Y.0000000003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在Turrell阿肯色州试验场(TATS)安装了两个同等大小(直径1.2米)的钻孔井基础(dsf)。TATS的土壤地层由6.1 m粘土下垫3.0 m粉砂下垫组成。北1.2 m DSF开挖后,粉质土从开挖侧壁向开挖底部塌陷。坍塌后,挖掘工作重新进行,DSF的建设完成。利用软件程序和土壤数据的平均值,预测了南1.2 m直径DSF的实测容量、单位侧阻力和端承阻力。对North 1.2 m直径DSF的实测响应进行了反演,以确定合适的强度和应力折减。根据该站点的测量数据,淤泥层内单位重量减少10%和砂层顶部3.0 m内土壤性质的改变产生了与测量响应相匹配的预测响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response of a drilled shaft foundation constructed in a redrilled shaft excavation following collapse
Two drilled shaft foundations (DSFs) of equal size (1.2 m diameter) were installed at the Turrell Arkansas Test Site (TATS). The soil stratigraphy at the TATS consisted of 6.1 m of clay underlain by 3.0 m of silt underlain by sand. After drilling the excavation for the North 1.2 m DSF, the silty soil collapsed from the sidewall of the excavation into the bottom of the excavation. Following the collapse, the excavation was redrilled and the construction of the DSF was completed. The measured capacity, unit side resistance, and end bearing resistance of the South 1.2 m diameter DSF were predicted by using software programs and mean values of soil data. The measured response of the North 1.2 m diameter DSF was backward modeled to determine the appropriate strength and stress reduction. Based on the measured data for this site, a 10 percent reduction in unit weight within the silt layer and a modification of the soil properties within the top 3.0 m of the sand layer produced predicted responses that matched the measured responses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note – Issue 3 (2018) Measured end resistance of CFA and drilled displacement piles in San Francisco Area alluvial clay DFI Journal Underwriters A sensitivity analysis on the parameters affecting large diameter helical pile installation torque, depth and installation power for offshore applications The deep soil mixing for the Galataport project in Istanbul, Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1