主动忏悔作为刑法激励工具:乌克兰模式

E. Mishchenko
{"title":"主动忏悔作为刑法激励工具:乌克兰模式","authors":"E. Mishchenko","doi":"10.15804/ksm20210207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For years one of the most fundamental questions of criminal law remains at the center of debate. What is the primary aim of criminal law, or, to put it simply, why do we need criminal law at all? Deterrence theorists claim that the primary justification of criminal legislation is to prevent and reduce crime.2 At the same time, retributivists advance the view that the primary aim of criminal legislation is to punish the offender, to give the wrongdoer the suffering she deserves.3 This discussion in legal scholarship is frequently intertwined with the debate about the justification of punishment. In his famous Prologomenon, H.L.A. Hart attempted","PeriodicalId":431204,"journal":{"name":"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Active Repentance as an Incentivizing Tool of Criminal Law: Ukrainian Model\",\"authors\":\"E. Mishchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.15804/ksm20210207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For years one of the most fundamental questions of criminal law remains at the center of debate. What is the primary aim of criminal law, or, to put it simply, why do we need criminal law at all? Deterrence theorists claim that the primary justification of criminal legislation is to prevent and reduce crime.2 At the same time, retributivists advance the view that the primary aim of criminal legislation is to punish the offender, to give the wrongdoer the suffering she deserves.3 This discussion in legal scholarship is frequently intertwined with the debate about the justification of punishment. In his famous Prologomenon, H.L.A. Hart attempted\",\"PeriodicalId\":431204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15804/ksm20210207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/ksm20210207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,刑法中最基本的问题之一一直是争论的中心。刑法的主要目的是什么,或者简单地说,我们为什么需要刑法?威慑理论家认为,刑事立法的首要正当性是预防和减少犯罪与此同时,报应主义提出了这样一种观点,即刑事立法的主要目的是惩罚犯罪者,使犯罪者受到应有的痛苦法律学术中的这一讨论经常与关于惩罚正当性的辩论交织在一起。在他著名的《前言》中,H.L.A. Hart试图
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Active Repentance as an Incentivizing Tool of Criminal Law: Ukrainian Model
For years one of the most fundamental questions of criminal law remains at the center of debate. What is the primary aim of criminal law, or, to put it simply, why do we need criminal law at all? Deterrence theorists claim that the primary justification of criminal legislation is to prevent and reduce crime.2 At the same time, retributivists advance the view that the primary aim of criminal legislation is to punish the offender, to give the wrongdoer the suffering she deserves.3 This discussion in legal scholarship is frequently intertwined with the debate about the justification of punishment. In his famous Prologomenon, H.L.A. Hart attempted
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How the natural resource curse contributed to the autocratic developments in Russian politics since the fall of the USSR Methodological importance of legal constructions and their influence on the legal norms interpretation Democratization and federalization. A comparative perspective between Russia’s and Spain’s early forays into a federal system Prospects for introducing the concept of “digital things” and “digital content”: expanding the scope of regulation of virtual assets Francuska polityka kolonialna w Afryce Zachodniej
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1