验证安全补丁

PSP '14 Pub Date : 2014-10-21 DOI:10.1145/2687148.2687151
J. Gallagher, Robin Gonzalez, M. Locasto
{"title":"验证安全补丁","authors":"J. Gallagher, Robin Gonzalez, M. Locasto","doi":"10.1145/2687148.2687151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we introduce a formal framework for ensuring the correctness of security patches. We discuss the issues and provide a sketch of how one could implement a system that proves (in many cases) or provides robust evidence (in other cases) that a security patch fixes a bug, and changes nothing else about the semantics of a program. We make use of an analysis of \"bug surfaces\" the set of inputs that trigger a bug, to give a type theoretic characterization of the non-buggy surface of a program. We thus give credence to the Langsec notion that security flaws are often about input handling, and show how formal patch and bug analysis can be used to define a more correct input type for a program.","PeriodicalId":433332,"journal":{"name":"PSP '14","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verifying security patches\",\"authors\":\"J. Gallagher, Robin Gonzalez, M. Locasto\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2687148.2687151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we introduce a formal framework for ensuring the correctness of security patches. We discuss the issues and provide a sketch of how one could implement a system that proves (in many cases) or provides robust evidence (in other cases) that a security patch fixes a bug, and changes nothing else about the semantics of a program. We make use of an analysis of \\\"bug surfaces\\\" the set of inputs that trigger a bug, to give a type theoretic characterization of the non-buggy surface of a program. We thus give credence to the Langsec notion that security flaws are often about input handling, and show how formal patch and bug analysis can be used to define a more correct input type for a program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSP '14\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSP '14\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2687148.2687151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSP '14","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2687148.2687151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在本文中,我们引入了一个正式的框架来确保安全补丁的正确性。我们讨论了这些问题,并概述了如何实现一个系统,该系统证明(在许多情况下)或提供可靠的证据(在其他情况下),安全补丁修复了错误,而不会改变程序的语义。我们利用对“bug曲面”(触发bug的一组输入)的分析,给出程序无bug曲面的类型理论表征。因此,我们相信Langsec的概念,即安全缺陷通常与输入处理有关,并展示了如何使用正式的补丁和错误分析来为程序定义更正确的输入类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Verifying security patches
In this paper, we introduce a formal framework for ensuring the correctness of security patches. We discuss the issues and provide a sketch of how one could implement a system that proves (in many cases) or provides robust evidence (in other cases) that a security patch fixes a bug, and changes nothing else about the semantics of a program. We make use of an analysis of "bug surfaces" the set of inputs that trigger a bug, to give a type theoretic characterization of the non-buggy surface of a program. We thus give credence to the Langsec notion that security flaws are often about input handling, and show how formal patch and bug analysis can be used to define a more correct input type for a program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Privacy integrated data stream queries Language-based capabilities Verifying security patches Statically typed string sanitation inside a python
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1