同时目标状态和传感器偏差估计:越多越好?

M. Kowalski, P. Willett
{"title":"同时目标状态和传感器偏差估计:越多越好?","authors":"M. Kowalski, P. Willett","doi":"10.1109/CAMSAP.2017.8313183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an analysis of several scenarios of target tracking state estimation when additionally estimating the biases of the measuring sensors in the state. Line of Sight (LOS) sensors are used with noisy data and angle biases that are unknown to the estimator. The addition of new state components can potentially be a drawback to the estimator and this is addressed by comparing the accuracy of estimation with 2, 3, and 4 sensors. Of particular interest to us is whether “more” is worth it: More sensors? Is bias estimation even worth doing? The answers are a qualified “yes” and a definite “sometimes.”.","PeriodicalId":315977,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous target state and sensor bias estimation: Is more better?\",\"authors\":\"M. Kowalski, P. Willett\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CAMSAP.2017.8313183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides an analysis of several scenarios of target tracking state estimation when additionally estimating the biases of the measuring sensors in the state. Line of Sight (LOS) sensors are used with noisy data and angle biases that are unknown to the estimator. The addition of new state components can potentially be a drawback to the estimator and this is addressed by comparing the accuracy of estimation with 2, 3, and 4 sensors. Of particular interest to us is whether “more” is worth it: More sensors? Is bias estimation even worth doing? The answers are a qualified “yes” and a definite “sometimes.”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAMSAP.2017.8313183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAMSAP.2017.8313183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了在附加估计状态下测量传感器偏差的情况下目标跟踪状态估计的几种情况。视距(LOS)传感器用于估计器未知的噪声数据和角度偏差。新状态组件的添加可能是估计器的一个潜在缺点,通过比较2、3和4传感器的估计精度来解决这个问题。我们特别感兴趣的是“更多”是否值得:更多的传感器?偏差估计值得做吗?答案是一个限定的“是”和一个确定的“有时”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simultaneous target state and sensor bias estimation: Is more better?
This paper provides an analysis of several scenarios of target tracking state estimation when additionally estimating the biases of the measuring sensors in the state. Line of Sight (LOS) sensors are used with noisy data and angle biases that are unknown to the estimator. The addition of new state components can potentially be a drawback to the estimator and this is addressed by comparing the accuracy of estimation with 2, 3, and 4 sensors. Of particular interest to us is whether “more” is worth it: More sensors? Is bias estimation even worth doing? The answers are a qualified “yes” and a definite “sometimes.”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved DOA estimators using partial relaxation approach Energy efficient transmission in MIMO interference channels with QoS constraints Restricted update sequential matrix diagonalisation for parahermitian matrices Sparse Bayesian learning with dictionary refinement for super-resolution through time L1-PCA signal subspace identification for non-sphered data under the ICA model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1