消除针对吸毒人员和滥用毒品者的毒品犯罪的执法工作

Achmad Yuliandi Erria Putra, Mirawaty Nurhamidin, Dede Cairul
{"title":"消除针对吸毒人员和滥用毒品者的毒品犯罪的执法工作","authors":"Achmad Yuliandi Erria Putra, Mirawaty Nurhamidin, Dede Cairul","doi":"10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law enforcement for narcotics addicts and abusers mostly applies prison sentences as in the Indonesian criminal justice system. It makes the prison to overcrowding. On the other hand, other law enforcement alternatives are deemed proven to be able to eradicate narcotics addicts and abusers and provide great benefits for all parties without applying penalties in the form of criminal sanctions. It is the application of a restorative justice approach in law enforcement for narcotics addicts and abusers. This research is focused on discussing the background of the problem: how to implement restorative justice in law enforcement for addicts and drug abusers. This study uses empirical normative research methods. The study's findings led law enforcement to adopt a restorative justice approach when dealing with narcotics addicts and abusers. It is accomplished by offering treatment in the form of medical or social rehabilitation. The spirit of restorative justice is essentially embodied in Article 54 of Narcotics Law Number 35 of 2009, which orders addicts and abusers to be treated medically or socially. However, it has not been implemented optimally and comprehensively. There is still a discrepancy in how law enforcement handles narcotics addicts and abusers. Restorative justice, including the provision of medical or social rehabilitation, should be implemented at all stages of law enforcement: investigation, prosecution, and even court appearances. However, until today, medical or social rehabilitation has only been provided by a judge's order following a court trial.Keywords: law enforcement; narcotics crime; restorative justice","PeriodicalId":280058,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law Enforcement in The Eradication of Narcotics Crimes Against Drug Addicts and Abusers\",\"authors\":\"Achmad Yuliandi Erria Putra, Mirawaty Nurhamidin, Dede Cairul\",\"doi\":\"10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Law enforcement for narcotics addicts and abusers mostly applies prison sentences as in the Indonesian criminal justice system. It makes the prison to overcrowding. On the other hand, other law enforcement alternatives are deemed proven to be able to eradicate narcotics addicts and abusers and provide great benefits for all parties without applying penalties in the form of criminal sanctions. It is the application of a restorative justice approach in law enforcement for narcotics addicts and abusers. This research is focused on discussing the background of the problem: how to implement restorative justice in law enforcement for addicts and drug abusers. This study uses empirical normative research methods. The study's findings led law enforcement to adopt a restorative justice approach when dealing with narcotics addicts and abusers. It is accomplished by offering treatment in the form of medical or social rehabilitation. The spirit of restorative justice is essentially embodied in Article 54 of Narcotics Law Number 35 of 2009, which orders addicts and abusers to be treated medically or socially. However, it has not been implemented optimally and comprehensively. There is still a discrepancy in how law enforcement handles narcotics addicts and abusers. Restorative justice, including the provision of medical or social rehabilitation, should be implemented at all stages of law enforcement: investigation, prosecution, and even court appearances. However, until today, medical or social rehabilitation has only been provided by a judge's order following a court trial.Keywords: law enforcement; narcotics crime; restorative justice\",\"PeriodicalId\":280058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与印度尼西亚刑事司法制度一样,对麻醉品成瘾者和滥用者的执法主要适用监禁。这使得监狱人满为患。另一方面,其他执法替代办法被认为已被证明能够根除麻醉品成瘾者和滥用者,并为所有各方带来巨大利益,而无需以刑事制裁的形式施加惩罚。它是在对麻醉品成瘾者和滥用者的执法中采用恢复性司法办法。本研究的重点是讨论问题的背景:如何在对吸毒者和吸毒者的执法中实施恢复性司法。本研究采用实证规范研究方法。这项研究的结果促使执法部门在处理毒品成瘾者和滥用者时采取恢复性司法方法。这是通过提供医疗或社会康复形式的治疗来实现的。恢复性司法精神主要体现在2009年第35号《麻醉品法》第54条中,该条命令对成瘾者和滥用者进行医疗或社会治疗。然而,它并没有得到最优和全面的实施。执法部门处理毒品成瘾者和滥用者的方式仍然存在差异。恢复性司法,包括提供医疗或社会康复,应在执法的所有阶段实施:调查、起诉,甚至出庭。然而,直到今天,医疗或社会康复只有在法庭审判后由法官下令才能提供。关键词:执法;毒品犯罪;恢复性司法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Law Enforcement in The Eradication of Narcotics Crimes Against Drug Addicts and Abusers
Law enforcement for narcotics addicts and abusers mostly applies prison sentences as in the Indonesian criminal justice system. It makes the prison to overcrowding. On the other hand, other law enforcement alternatives are deemed proven to be able to eradicate narcotics addicts and abusers and provide great benefits for all parties without applying penalties in the form of criminal sanctions. It is the application of a restorative justice approach in law enforcement for narcotics addicts and abusers. This research is focused on discussing the background of the problem: how to implement restorative justice in law enforcement for addicts and drug abusers. This study uses empirical normative research methods. The study's findings led law enforcement to adopt a restorative justice approach when dealing with narcotics addicts and abusers. It is accomplished by offering treatment in the form of medical or social rehabilitation. The spirit of restorative justice is essentially embodied in Article 54 of Narcotics Law Number 35 of 2009, which orders addicts and abusers to be treated medically or socially. However, it has not been implemented optimally and comprehensively. There is still a discrepancy in how law enforcement handles narcotics addicts and abusers. Restorative justice, including the provision of medical or social rehabilitation, should be implemented at all stages of law enforcement: investigation, prosecution, and even court appearances. However, until today, medical or social rehabilitation has only been provided by a judge's order following a court trial.Keywords: law enforcement; narcotics crime; restorative justice
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of Cryptoasset-Related Crimes and Convergence-Based Law Enforcement Policies Harmonizing Regional Spatial Arrangements As Effort To Improve Law Number 11 Of 2020 On Job Creation To Optimize Regional Development Implementing Bugis-Makassar Local Wisdom Within The Prosecutor's Office In Parepare City, South Sulawesi The Effect Of European Union's Implementation Of The Russian Economic Embargo On International Trade Sector Legal Aspect Of Taxation: Prioritizing the Regularend Function of the Budgeter for National Economic Resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1