关于高阶思考技能协调系统材料的项目开发的大二学生

A. Mustofa
{"title":"关于高阶思考技能协调系统材料的项目开发的大二学生","authors":"A. Mustofa","doi":"10.55719/jpb.v1i1.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conducting an assessment is one of the teacher's duties apart from compiling a learning program and implementing it in the classroom. The teacher must also be able to determine what can be obtained or achieved from the learning process that has been organized. The purpose of this study was to develop HOTS questions on the coordination system material and to test the quality of HOTS questions in the coordination system material for high school students in grade X. The subjects of this study consisted of 18 students who were selected purposively. Analysis of the items consisted of validity, reliability, difficulty level, differentiation, and trick effectiveness. The results of the analysis of the validity of the questions with a significant level of 5% for 18 students obtained 50 questions (92%) valid. The results of the reliability test of the items obtained the reliability index in the \"high\" criteria. So the items have high consistency in measuring the ability of students regarding the material of the coordination system to distinguish high-skilled students from low-ability students. The results of the analysis of the difficulty level of the questions were: 26 questions (5%) had an easy difficulty level, 9 questions (75%) had a moderate difficulty level and 15 questions (20%) had a difficult difficulty level. Overall, there were 4 distractor test results that did not function. A bully is said not to function if less than 5% of all test takers are selected. The crooks that didn't work need to be revised again. The results of the 84% difference power test were rejected so it needed to be revised.","PeriodicalId":274970,"journal":{"name":"JPB - Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENGEMBANGAN BUTIR SOAL HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILL (HOTS) MATERI SISTEM KOORDINASI PADA SISWA SMA KELAS XI\",\"authors\":\"A. Mustofa\",\"doi\":\"10.55719/jpb.v1i1.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conducting an assessment is one of the teacher's duties apart from compiling a learning program and implementing it in the classroom. The teacher must also be able to determine what can be obtained or achieved from the learning process that has been organized. The purpose of this study was to develop HOTS questions on the coordination system material and to test the quality of HOTS questions in the coordination system material for high school students in grade X. The subjects of this study consisted of 18 students who were selected purposively. Analysis of the items consisted of validity, reliability, difficulty level, differentiation, and trick effectiveness. The results of the analysis of the validity of the questions with a significant level of 5% for 18 students obtained 50 questions (92%) valid. The results of the reliability test of the items obtained the reliability index in the \\\"high\\\" criteria. So the items have high consistency in measuring the ability of students regarding the material of the coordination system to distinguish high-skilled students from low-ability students. The results of the analysis of the difficulty level of the questions were: 26 questions (5%) had an easy difficulty level, 9 questions (75%) had a moderate difficulty level and 15 questions (20%) had a difficult difficulty level. Overall, there were 4 distractor test results that did not function. A bully is said not to function if less than 5% of all test takers are selected. The crooks that didn't work need to be revised again. The results of the 84% difference power test were rejected so it needed to be revised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JPB - Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JPB - Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55719/jpb.v1i1.201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPB - Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55719/jpb.v1i1.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除了编写学习计划并在课堂上实施外,进行评估是教师的职责之一。教师还必须能够确定从组织的学习过程中可以获得或实现什么。本研究的目的是在协调系统材料上编制HOTS问题,并检验协调系统材料中HOTS问题的质量。本研究的被试包括18名有目的的学生。测试项目的分析包括效度、信度、难易程度、差异和诡计效度。对18名学生中显著水平为5%的问题进行效度分析,得到50个问题(92%)的效度。项目的信度测试结果获得了“高”标准的信度指标。因此,在协调系统的材料方面,测量学生的能力具有很高的一致性,以区分高技能学生和低能力学生。题目难易程度分析结果为:易难程度26题(5%),中难程度9题(75%),难易程度15题(20%)。总的来说,有4个分心测试结果不起作用。如果被选中的考生少于5%,霸凌者就不能发挥作用。不工作的骗子需要再次修改。84%差功率检验的结果被拒绝,需要修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PENGEMBANGAN BUTIR SOAL HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILL (HOTS) MATERI SISTEM KOORDINASI PADA SISWA SMA KELAS XI
Conducting an assessment is one of the teacher's duties apart from compiling a learning program and implementing it in the classroom. The teacher must also be able to determine what can be obtained or achieved from the learning process that has been organized. The purpose of this study was to develop HOTS questions on the coordination system material and to test the quality of HOTS questions in the coordination system material for high school students in grade X. The subjects of this study consisted of 18 students who were selected purposively. Analysis of the items consisted of validity, reliability, difficulty level, differentiation, and trick effectiveness. The results of the analysis of the validity of the questions with a significant level of 5% for 18 students obtained 50 questions (92%) valid. The results of the reliability test of the items obtained the reliability index in the "high" criteria. So the items have high consistency in measuring the ability of students regarding the material of the coordination system to distinguish high-skilled students from low-ability students. The results of the analysis of the difficulty level of the questions were: 26 questions (5%) had an easy difficulty level, 9 questions (75%) had a moderate difficulty level and 15 questions (20%) had a difficult difficulty level. Overall, there were 4 distractor test results that did not function. A bully is said not to function if less than 5% of all test takers are selected. The crooks that didn't work need to be revised again. The results of the 84% difference power test were rejected so it needed to be revised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 UPAYA PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR STRUKTUR JARINGAN HEWAN MELALUI PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PENGENDALIAN PEMBELAHAN SEL UNTUK MENUMBUH KEMBANGKAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek (PJBL) Integrasi Strategi Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction (ARCS) terhadap Motivasi Siswa Pada Materi Perubahan Lingkungan Di SMAN 11 Pinrang VALIDASI SOAL BERBASIS STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS) UNTUK CALON GURU BIOLOGI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1