巴西潘塔纳尔地区美洲虎的多层次、多尺度建模与预测映射。

Eve Bohnett, T. Hoctor, D. Hulse, B. Ahmad, Bernardo Niebuhr, R. Morato
{"title":"巴西潘塔纳尔地区美洲虎的多层次、多尺度建模与预测映射。","authors":"Eve Bohnett, T. Hoctor, D. Hulse, B. Ahmad, Bernardo Niebuhr, R. Morato","doi":"10.21203/rs.2.23193/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Machine learning (ML) methods and remote sensing data were used to build multi-level multi-scale resource selection models and predictive maps onto the extended landscape for jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Brazilian Pantanal. Objectives were to compare multiple predictive modeling and exploratory modeling approaches. Included in the analysis, multi-scale raster grains (30m, 90m, 180m, 360m, 720m, 1440m), GPS collaring temporal levels (point, path, and step) and model data structural levels (group, individual, case-control).Methods Multi-scale multi-level data subsets were fit with explanatory and predictive statistical methods. Conditional logistic regression, generalized additive modeling (GAM), and classification regression trees, such as random forests (RF) and gradient boosted regression tree (GBM) were compared for their utility to the study. Model evaluation, using training and testing data in a k-fold cross-validation approach, determined the AUC, Kappa, and TSS for model evaluation and comparison. · Results Results indicated that the multi-level, multi-scale techniques improved model outputs. Overall, larger level models and those that used multi-scale raster grains showed the best model evaluation. The highest-ranked model was the multi-scale path selection function GBM and was one of the broadest levels of data. ·Conclusions Results indicated that multi-level, multi-scale models produced mixed results of applicability across models and levels. The identification of the appropriate temporal scale and statistical model needs careful consideration in predictive mapping efforts.","PeriodicalId":265480,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Ecology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Level, Multi-Scale Modeling and Predictive Mapping for Jaguars in the Brazilian Pantanal.\",\"authors\":\"Eve Bohnett, T. Hoctor, D. Hulse, B. Ahmad, Bernardo Niebuhr, R. Morato\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.2.23193/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background Machine learning (ML) methods and remote sensing data were used to build multi-level multi-scale resource selection models and predictive maps onto the extended landscape for jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Brazilian Pantanal. Objectives were to compare multiple predictive modeling and exploratory modeling approaches. Included in the analysis, multi-scale raster grains (30m, 90m, 180m, 360m, 720m, 1440m), GPS collaring temporal levels (point, path, and step) and model data structural levels (group, individual, case-control).Methods Multi-scale multi-level data subsets were fit with explanatory and predictive statistical methods. Conditional logistic regression, generalized additive modeling (GAM), and classification regression trees, such as random forests (RF) and gradient boosted regression tree (GBM) were compared for their utility to the study. Model evaluation, using training and testing data in a k-fold cross-validation approach, determined the AUC, Kappa, and TSS for model evaluation and comparison. · Results Results indicated that the multi-level, multi-scale techniques improved model outputs. Overall, larger level models and those that used multi-scale raster grains showed the best model evaluation. The highest-ranked model was the multi-scale path selection function GBM and was one of the broadest levels of data. ·Conclusions Results indicated that multi-level, multi-scale models produced mixed results of applicability across models and levels. The identification of the appropriate temporal scale and statistical model needs careful consideration in predictive mapping efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Ecology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.23193/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.23193/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

利用机器学习(ML)方法和遥感数据,建立了巴西潘塔纳尔美洲豹(Panthera onca)扩展景观的多层次多尺度资源选择模型和预测地图。目的是比较多种预测建模和探索性建模方法。分析包括多尺度栅格颗粒(30m、90m、180m、360m、720m、1440m)、GPS定位时间层次(点、路径、阶跃)和模型数据结构层次(群体、个体、病例对照)。方法采用解释统计和预测统计方法对多尺度多层次数据子集进行拟合。比较了条件逻辑回归、广义加性建模(GAM)和分类回归树(如随机森林(RF)和梯度增强回归树(GBM))在研究中的实用性。模型评估,使用k-fold交叉验证方法中的训练和测试数据,确定模型评估和比较的AUC, Kappa和TSS。结果表明,多层次、多尺度技术改善了模型输出。总体而言,大尺度模型和使用多尺度栅格颗粒的模型评价最好。排名最高的模型是多尺度路径选择函数GBM,是数据层次最广的模型之一。结果表明,多层次、多尺度模型产生了不同模型和水平适用性的混合结果。在预测制图工作中,需要仔细考虑适当的时间尺度和统计模型的确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-Level, Multi-Scale Modeling and Predictive Mapping for Jaguars in the Brazilian Pantanal.
Background Machine learning (ML) methods and remote sensing data were used to build multi-level multi-scale resource selection models and predictive maps onto the extended landscape for jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Brazilian Pantanal. Objectives were to compare multiple predictive modeling and exploratory modeling approaches. Included in the analysis, multi-scale raster grains (30m, 90m, 180m, 360m, 720m, 1440m), GPS collaring temporal levels (point, path, and step) and model data structural levels (group, individual, case-control).Methods Multi-scale multi-level data subsets were fit with explanatory and predictive statistical methods. Conditional logistic regression, generalized additive modeling (GAM), and classification regression trees, such as random forests (RF) and gradient boosted regression tree (GBM) were compared for their utility to the study. Model evaluation, using training and testing data in a k-fold cross-validation approach, determined the AUC, Kappa, and TSS for model evaluation and comparison. · Results Results indicated that the multi-level, multi-scale techniques improved model outputs. Overall, larger level models and those that used multi-scale raster grains showed the best model evaluation. The highest-ranked model was the multi-scale path selection function GBM and was one of the broadest levels of data. ·Conclusions Results indicated that multi-level, multi-scale models produced mixed results of applicability across models and levels. The identification of the appropriate temporal scale and statistical model needs careful consideration in predictive mapping efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
City Communal Aspiration System—City without Chimneys Spatial Zonation and Diversity of Bivalves and Gastropods in Mangrove Forests of Casiguran, Aurora Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.), Waste Streams, Characterisation and Valorisation: An Overview Chihuahuan Desert Soil Biota Dynamic of Mangrove Associated Molluscs in Anthropized Areas of the Cameroon Coastline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1