退而不升:在我们这个麻烦时代,企业的道德选择

D. Ladkin
{"title":"退而不升:在我们这个麻烦时代,企业的道德选择","authors":"D. Ladkin","doi":"10.4337/9781789903058.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an interview with the New York Times in August of 2017, the Chief Executive of Apple Computers, Tim Cook was quoted to have said that because government was becoming ‘less functional’ and ‘less able to work at the speed it once did’, businesses and other areas of society needed to ‘step up’ to fulfil the roles that government once played (Sorkin, 2017). This chapter argues a contrary view: that the truly ethical response for business in our troubling times is to step ‘down’, rather than ‘up’. The idea that corporations need to step up in order to fill a moral gap speaks to the assumption that they are now the prime actors within society whose operational approaches will best serve society at large. Secondly, it assumes that businesses, rather than elected government officials, are best placed to decide how to serve wider societal interests. Furthermore, it intimates that businesses themselves can choose the ways of stepping up that suit them best. This is clearly the case for Apple, who donated $10 million to hurricane relief in 2017 (Mejia, 2017) but simultaneously holds over $252 billion in offshore accounts in order not to pay tax on these profits (Drucker and Bowen, 2017). Stepping down, that is, businesses taking a place as one voice among many rather than assuming the role of central actors in society, offers a direct challenge to the neoliberal ideology of our times. Neoliberalism places market mechanisms and the pursuit of profit as central to human endeavour. As primary players within markets businesses have become dominant actors whose interests trump all others (Klein, 2014). Cook’s statement speaks of the hubris that attends principal and privileged positions. Indeed, corporations’ central position is so unequivocally dominant that Cook’s statement is interpreted as an indication of his intent to take a moral lead, rather than as a practice of applying bandaids to good causes (as well as a step which attracts favourable media attention).","PeriodicalId":432862,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Business Leadership in Troubling Times","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stepping down rather than up: the ethical option for business in our troubling times\",\"authors\":\"D. Ladkin\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781789903058.00009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an interview with the New York Times in August of 2017, the Chief Executive of Apple Computers, Tim Cook was quoted to have said that because government was becoming ‘less functional’ and ‘less able to work at the speed it once did’, businesses and other areas of society needed to ‘step up’ to fulfil the roles that government once played (Sorkin, 2017). This chapter argues a contrary view: that the truly ethical response for business in our troubling times is to step ‘down’, rather than ‘up’. The idea that corporations need to step up in order to fill a moral gap speaks to the assumption that they are now the prime actors within society whose operational approaches will best serve society at large. Secondly, it assumes that businesses, rather than elected government officials, are best placed to decide how to serve wider societal interests. Furthermore, it intimates that businesses themselves can choose the ways of stepping up that suit them best. This is clearly the case for Apple, who donated $10 million to hurricane relief in 2017 (Mejia, 2017) but simultaneously holds over $252 billion in offshore accounts in order not to pay tax on these profits (Drucker and Bowen, 2017). Stepping down, that is, businesses taking a place as one voice among many rather than assuming the role of central actors in society, offers a direct challenge to the neoliberal ideology of our times. Neoliberalism places market mechanisms and the pursuit of profit as central to human endeavour. As primary players within markets businesses have become dominant actors whose interests trump all others (Klein, 2014). Cook’s statement speaks of the hubris that attends principal and privileged positions. Indeed, corporations’ central position is so unequivocally dominant that Cook’s statement is interpreted as an indication of his intent to take a moral lead, rather than as a practice of applying bandaids to good causes (as well as a step which attracts favourable media attention).\",\"PeriodicalId\":432862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethical Business Leadership in Troubling Times\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethical Business Leadership in Troubling Times\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903058.00009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Business Leadership in Troubling Times","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903058.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2017年8月接受《纽约时报》采访时,苹果公司首席执行官蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)被引述说,由于政府正在变得“功能减弱”,“无法以以前的速度工作”,企业和社会其他领域需要“加紧”履行政府曾经扮演的角色(Sorkin, 2017)。本章提出了一个相反的观点:在我们这个麻烦的时代,对企业真正合乎道德的回应是“下台”,而不是“上位”。企业需要加强以填补道德空白的想法,说明了这样一种假设,即它们现在是社会中的主要参与者,其运营方法将最好地为整个社会服务。其次,它假设企业,而不是民选的政府官员,最有资格决定如何为更广泛的社会利益服务。此外,这表明企业自己可以选择最适合自己的方式。这显然是苹果公司的情况,他们在2017年为飓风救援捐赠了1000万美元(Mejia, 2017),但同时持有超过2520亿美元的离岸账户,以便不为这些利润纳税(Drucker和Bowen, 2017)。退让,也就是让企业在众多声音中占据一席之地,而不是在社会中扮演核心角色,这对我们这个时代的新自由主义意识形态构成了直接挑战。新自由主义将市场机制和对利润的追求作为人类努力的核心。作为市场中的主要参与者,企业已经成为主导角色,其利益超过所有其他(Klein, 2014)。库克的声明体现了校长和特权阶层的傲慢。事实上,企业的核心地位是如此明确地占据主导地位,以至于库克的声明被解读为他有意在道德上起带头作用的迹象,而不是一种为公益事业贴上创可贴的做法(以及吸引有利媒体关注的一步)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stepping down rather than up: the ethical option for business in our troubling times
In an interview with the New York Times in August of 2017, the Chief Executive of Apple Computers, Tim Cook was quoted to have said that because government was becoming ‘less functional’ and ‘less able to work at the speed it once did’, businesses and other areas of society needed to ‘step up’ to fulfil the roles that government once played (Sorkin, 2017). This chapter argues a contrary view: that the truly ethical response for business in our troubling times is to step ‘down’, rather than ‘up’. The idea that corporations need to step up in order to fill a moral gap speaks to the assumption that they are now the prime actors within society whose operational approaches will best serve society at large. Secondly, it assumes that businesses, rather than elected government officials, are best placed to decide how to serve wider societal interests. Furthermore, it intimates that businesses themselves can choose the ways of stepping up that suit them best. This is clearly the case for Apple, who donated $10 million to hurricane relief in 2017 (Mejia, 2017) but simultaneously holds over $252 billion in offshore accounts in order not to pay tax on these profits (Drucker and Bowen, 2017). Stepping down, that is, businesses taking a place as one voice among many rather than assuming the role of central actors in society, offers a direct challenge to the neoliberal ideology of our times. Neoliberalism places market mechanisms and the pursuit of profit as central to human endeavour. As primary players within markets businesses have become dominant actors whose interests trump all others (Klein, 2014). Cook’s statement speaks of the hubris that attends principal and privileged positions. Indeed, corporations’ central position is so unequivocally dominant that Cook’s statement is interpreted as an indication of his intent to take a moral lead, rather than as a practice of applying bandaids to good causes (as well as a step which attracts favourable media attention).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An ethical problem in troubled times: ethical decision making by local managers employing an immigrant workforce in Gaziantep, Turkey Business ethics as critical thinking: moral motivations and the limits of ethics Becoming responsible: understanding the organizational power dynamics of CSR and corporate ethics The board of directors’ role in ensuring accountability and creating value: stakeholder and shareholder complementarity Corporate leadership versus the Twitter mob
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1