不同优化算法在滑坡识别中的比较研究

Lijesh L, G. Saroja
{"title":"不同优化算法在滑坡识别中的比较研究","authors":"Lijesh L, G. Saroja","doi":"10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Landslide is a complicated phenomenon related to land movement that cause heavy human loss, ecological imbalance and structural damages. This complicated phenomenon is commonly seen in mountainous regions due to gravitational mass movement and shear strength decrement leading to geological disaster. Here, human activities include excavation, digging, and deforestation; whereas natural calamities includeheavy rainfall, volcanic eruptions and earthquake. Landslide is ranked third among disaster types, as it causes monetary loss to billions of dollars along human loss to millions. Hence, it is compulsory needed to identify landslide to avoid losses in its earlier stage itself. To identify these losses, researchers have established various new methods by utilizing optimization algorithms. The aim of this research is to justify and compare various optimization algorithms for the identification of landslide. The comparison analysis for landslide identification is done with five algorithms, such as Competitive S warm Optimizer (CSO)-basedDeepGenerative Adversarial Network (Deep GAN), Tunicate Swarm Algorithm (TSA)-based deep GAN, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm-based deep GAN, Water Cycle Algorithm (WCA)-based deep GAN, and Water Cycle Particle Swarm Optimization (WCPSO)-based GAN. However, WCPSO is derived by the hybridization of WCA and PSO. From the comparison, the WCPSO exhibits maximum values of accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity with 0.897, 0.857, and 0.915.","PeriodicalId":356949,"journal":{"name":"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of Landslide Identification using different optimization Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Lijesh L, G. Saroja\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Landslide is a complicated phenomenon related to land movement that cause heavy human loss, ecological imbalance and structural damages. This complicated phenomenon is commonly seen in mountainous regions due to gravitational mass movement and shear strength decrement leading to geological disaster. Here, human activities include excavation, digging, and deforestation; whereas natural calamities includeheavy rainfall, volcanic eruptions and earthquake. Landslide is ranked third among disaster types, as it causes monetary loss to billions of dollars along human loss to millions. Hence, it is compulsory needed to identify landslide to avoid losses in its earlier stage itself. To identify these losses, researchers have established various new methods by utilizing optimization algorithms. The aim of this research is to justify and compare various optimization algorithms for the identification of landslide. The comparison analysis for landslide identification is done with five algorithms, such as Competitive S warm Optimizer (CSO)-basedDeepGenerative Adversarial Network (Deep GAN), Tunicate Swarm Algorithm (TSA)-based deep GAN, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm-based deep GAN, Water Cycle Algorithm (WCA)-based deep GAN, and Water Cycle Particle Swarm Optimization (WCPSO)-based GAN. However, WCPSO is derived by the hybridization of WCA and PSO. From the comparison, the WCPSO exhibits maximum values of accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity with 0.897, 0.857, and 0.915.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑坡是一种与土地运动有关的复杂现象,造成严重的人类损失、生态失衡和结构破坏。这种复杂的现象在山区是常见的,主要是由于重力质量运动和剪切强度衰减导致的地质灾害。在这里,人类活动包括挖掘、挖掘和砍伐森林;而自然灾害则包括暴雨、火山爆发和地震。山体滑坡在灾害类型中排名第三,因为它造成数十亿美元的经济损失和数百万人的损失。因此,必须对滑坡进行识别,以避免其早期损失。为了识别这些损失,研究人员利用优化算法建立了各种新的方法。本研究的目的是证明和比较各种滑坡识别的优化算法。对比分析了基于竞争Swarm Optimizer (CSO)的深度生成对抗网络(Deep generative Adversarial Network, Deep GAN)、基于束状虫群算法(TSA)的深度GAN、基于粒子群优化(Particle Swarm Optimization, PSO)算法的深度GAN、基于水循环算法(Water Cycle Algorithm, WCA)的深度GAN和基于水循环粒子群优化(Water Cycle Particle Swarm Optimization, WCPSO)的深度GAN算法在滑坡识别中的应用。而WCPSO是由WCA和PSO杂交而来。对比发现,WCPSO的准确性、特异性和敏感性最高,分别为0.897、0.857和0.915。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of Landslide Identification using different optimization Algorithms
Landslide is a complicated phenomenon related to land movement that cause heavy human loss, ecological imbalance and structural damages. This complicated phenomenon is commonly seen in mountainous regions due to gravitational mass movement and shear strength decrement leading to geological disaster. Here, human activities include excavation, digging, and deforestation; whereas natural calamities includeheavy rainfall, volcanic eruptions and earthquake. Landslide is ranked third among disaster types, as it causes monetary loss to billions of dollars along human loss to millions. Hence, it is compulsory needed to identify landslide to avoid losses in its earlier stage itself. To identify these losses, researchers have established various new methods by utilizing optimization algorithms. The aim of this research is to justify and compare various optimization algorithms for the identification of landslide. The comparison analysis for landslide identification is done with five algorithms, such as Competitive S warm Optimizer (CSO)-basedDeepGenerative Adversarial Network (Deep GAN), Tunicate Swarm Algorithm (TSA)-based deep GAN, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm-based deep GAN, Water Cycle Algorithm (WCA)-based deep GAN, and Water Cycle Particle Swarm Optimization (WCPSO)-based GAN. However, WCPSO is derived by the hybridization of WCA and PSO. From the comparison, the WCPSO exhibits maximum values of accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity with 0.897, 0.857, and 0.915.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-Objective Artificial Flora Algorithm Based Optimal Handover Scheme for LTE-Advanced Networks Named Entity Recognition using CRF with Active Learning Algorithm in English Texts FPGA Implementation of Lattice-Wave Half-Order Digital Integrator using Radix-$2^{r}$ Digit Recoding Green Cloud Computing- Next Step Towards Eco-friendly Work Stations Diabetes Prediction using Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes and Random Forest Machine Learning Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1