使用层次分析法(AHP)对ESB进行合格分析

Zeeshan Siddiqui, A. Abdullah, M. Khan
{"title":"使用层次分析法(AHP)对ESB进行合格分析","authors":"Zeeshan Siddiqui, A. Abdullah, M. Khan","doi":"10.1109/ISMS.2011.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research study stress upon the qualified or comparative analysis between commercial and non-commercial Enterprise Service Buses (ESB) for large-scale organizations. We have used Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method known as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on three criteria i.e. Information Security, Interoperability & High availability. Many comparative analysis reports and papers are available having proven results of comparing non-commercial ESB(s), however, very few reports were found having performed their analysis on commercial ESB(s). We have performed this analysis on the basis of tabular and mathematical proofs by comparing commercially known ESB i.e. Oracle ESB with two non-commercial yet very famous ESB(s) i.e. Mule & Fuse. This research analysis will motivate decision makers to choose the best rated ESB on the basis of our criteria. To achieve our objective we have presented the problem as hierarchy, established the priorities, criteria and performed mathematical computing to prove our analysis.","PeriodicalId":193599,"journal":{"name":"2011 Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualified Analysis b/w ESB(s) Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method\",\"authors\":\"Zeeshan Siddiqui, A. Abdullah, M. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMS.2011.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research study stress upon the qualified or comparative analysis between commercial and non-commercial Enterprise Service Buses (ESB) for large-scale organizations. We have used Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method known as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on three criteria i.e. Information Security, Interoperability & High availability. Many comparative analysis reports and papers are available having proven results of comparing non-commercial ESB(s), however, very few reports were found having performed their analysis on commercial ESB(s). We have performed this analysis on the basis of tabular and mathematical proofs by comparing commercially known ESB i.e. Oracle ESB with two non-commercial yet very famous ESB(s) i.e. Mule & Fuse. This research analysis will motivate decision makers to choose the best rated ESB on the basis of our criteria. To achieve our objective we have presented the problem as hierarchy, established the priorities, criteria and performed mathematical computing to prove our analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMS.2011.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMS.2011.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本研究着重于对大型组织的商业和非商业企业服务总线(ESB)进行合格的或比较的分析。我们使用了多标准决策分析(MCDA)方法,即基于三个标准的分析层次过程(AHP),即信息安全,互操作性和高可用性。许多比较分析报告和论文都提供了对非商业ESB进行比较的经过验证的结果,然而,很少有报告对商业ESB进行了分析。通过比较商业上已知的ESB(如Oracle ESB)和两个非商业但非常著名的ESB(如Mule和Fuse),我们在表格和数学证明的基础上进行了分析。这项研究分析将激励决策者根据我们的标准选择评级最好的ESB。为了实现我们的目标,我们提出了层次问题,建立了优先级,标准和执行数学计算来证明我们的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Qualified Analysis b/w ESB(s) Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method
This research study stress upon the qualified or comparative analysis between commercial and non-commercial Enterprise Service Buses (ESB) for large-scale organizations. We have used Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method known as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on three criteria i.e. Information Security, Interoperability & High availability. Many comparative analysis reports and papers are available having proven results of comparing non-commercial ESB(s), however, very few reports were found having performed their analysis on commercial ESB(s). We have performed this analysis on the basis of tabular and mathematical proofs by comparing commercially known ESB i.e. Oracle ESB with two non-commercial yet very famous ESB(s) i.e. Mule & Fuse. This research analysis will motivate decision makers to choose the best rated ESB on the basis of our criteria. To achieve our objective we have presented the problem as hierarchy, established the priorities, criteria and performed mathematical computing to prove our analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information Measure Ratio Based Real Time Approach for Hand Region Segmentation with a Focus on Gesture Recognition Implementation of the Phase II Compiler for the ARM7TDMI-S Dual-Core Microprocessor Design of Hierarchical Thread Pool Executor for DSM Nonlinearity Modelling of QoE for Video Streaming over Wireless and Mobile Network Averaged Segmental Partial Hausdorff Distance for Robust Face Recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1