弹性模量试验中土工格栅加固对骨料基体的中断

C. D. Vickery, W. Guthrie
{"title":"弹性模量试验中土工格栅加固对骨料基体的中断","authors":"C. D. Vickery, W. Guthrie","doi":"10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inclusion of geogrid in aggregate base materials is an increasingly popular practice in pavement construction. Geogrid reinforcement can improve the performance of pavements by stiffening the base material and decreasing pavement deformations. The objectives of this research were to establish a possible explanation for why laboratory resilient modulus testing is ineffective for assessing improvements in the stiffness of geogrid-reinforced aggregate base specimens and to recommend possible testing solutions. The scope of the research included one aggregate base material and one type of geogrid. Cyclic loading data were used to calculate the resilient modulus on 200-cycle intervals up to 10,000 cycles, and quick shear data were used to calculate the modulus at 2 percent strain after the conditioning period. Specimens with and without geogrid reinforcement were assessed in the testing. As with other studies, the results do not show a significant benefit of geogrid reinforcement on resilient modulus of the tested material. Indeed, specimens reinforced with geogrid had significantly lower dry densities than specimens without geogrid, which suggests that the geogrid interrupted the aggregate matrix. However, the results do show a significant benefit of geogrid reinforcement on modulus at 2 percent strain of the tested material. Because the modulus at 2 percent strain appears to have promise for evaluating the benefits of geogrid reinforcement in aggregate base materials, further research is recommended to correlate this property with typical pavement design inputs.","PeriodicalId":186446,"journal":{"name":"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interruption of the Aggregate Matrix by Geogrid Reinforcement in Resilient Modulus Testing\",\"authors\":\"C. D. Vickery, W. Guthrie\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inclusion of geogrid in aggregate base materials is an increasingly popular practice in pavement construction. Geogrid reinforcement can improve the performance of pavements by stiffening the base material and decreasing pavement deformations. The objectives of this research were to establish a possible explanation for why laboratory resilient modulus testing is ineffective for assessing improvements in the stiffness of geogrid-reinforced aggregate base specimens and to recommend possible testing solutions. The scope of the research included one aggregate base material and one type of geogrid. Cyclic loading data were used to calculate the resilient modulus on 200-cycle intervals up to 10,000 cycles, and quick shear data were used to calculate the modulus at 2 percent strain after the conditioning period. Specimens with and without geogrid reinforcement were assessed in the testing. As with other studies, the results do not show a significant benefit of geogrid reinforcement on resilient modulus of the tested material. Indeed, specimens reinforced with geogrid had significantly lower dry densities than specimens without geogrid, which suggests that the geogrid interrupted the aggregate matrix. However, the results do show a significant benefit of geogrid reinforcement on modulus at 2 percent strain of the tested material. Because the modulus at 2 percent strain appears to have promise for evaluating the benefits of geogrid reinforcement in aggregate base materials, further research is recommended to correlate this property with typical pavement design inputs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土工格栅加入集料基层材料是路面施工中越来越普遍的做法。土工格栅加固可以增强基层材料的刚度,减少路面变形,从而改善路面的使用性能。本研究的目的是建立一个可能的解释,为什么实验室弹性模量测试对评估土工格栅增强骨料基础试件刚度的改进无效,并推荐可能的测试解决方案。研究范围包括一种集料基层材料和一种土工格栅。循环加载数据用于计算200 ~ 10000次循环的弹性模量,快速剪切数据用于计算调节期后2%应变下的弹性模量。在试验中对加筋和不加筋的试件进行了评估。与其他研究一样,结果并没有显示土工格栅加固对测试材料的弹性模量有显著的好处。加筋土工格栅的干密度明显低于未加筋土工格栅的干密度,说明土工格栅阻断了骨料基质。然而,结果确实显示了土工格栅加固在测试材料的2%应变下对模量的显著好处。由于2%应变下的模量似乎有望评估骨料基层材料中土工格栅加固的好处,因此建议进一步研究将该特性与典型的路面设计输入联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interruption of the Aggregate Matrix by Geogrid Reinforcement in Resilient Modulus Testing
Inclusion of geogrid in aggregate base materials is an increasingly popular practice in pavement construction. Geogrid reinforcement can improve the performance of pavements by stiffening the base material and decreasing pavement deformations. The objectives of this research were to establish a possible explanation for why laboratory resilient modulus testing is ineffective for assessing improvements in the stiffness of geogrid-reinforced aggregate base specimens and to recommend possible testing solutions. The scope of the research included one aggregate base material and one type of geogrid. Cyclic loading data were used to calculate the resilient modulus on 200-cycle intervals up to 10,000 cycles, and quick shear data were used to calculate the modulus at 2 percent strain after the conditioning period. Specimens with and without geogrid reinforcement were assessed in the testing. As with other studies, the results do not show a significant benefit of geogrid reinforcement on resilient modulus of the tested material. Indeed, specimens reinforced with geogrid had significantly lower dry densities than specimens without geogrid, which suggests that the geogrid interrupted the aggregate matrix. However, the results do show a significant benefit of geogrid reinforcement on modulus at 2 percent strain of the tested material. Because the modulus at 2 percent strain appears to have promise for evaluating the benefits of geogrid reinforcement in aggregate base materials, further research is recommended to correlate this property with typical pavement design inputs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virtual Reality Training in Electric Utility Sector - An Underground Application Study Case Different assignments as different contexts: predictors across assignments and outcome measures in CS1 2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC) Micromachining of Silicon Carbide using Wire Electrical Discharge Machining Stereophonic Frequency Modulation using MATLAB: An Undergraduate Research Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1