当代俄罗斯传统价值观的修辞

Sergey Chapnin
{"title":"当代俄罗斯传统价值观的修辞","authors":"Sergey Chapnin","doi":"10.15203/3187-99-3-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the notion of “traditional values” has recently become popular in Russia, it is actually a new phenomenon in both religious and political discourse. In the 1990s, the most common and established use of the word “values” was with adjectives such as “spiritual” and “moral,” while the word “traditional” was mostly attributed to religions. In a certain sense, the very concept of “spiritual and moral values” was used as a transitory one. Having emerged between the 1980s and the 1990s as an antithesis to Communist values, this concept was nevertheless based on an understanding of spirituality that was exceptionally wide and could not be limited exclusively to the Orthodox framework. As a result, the new social and political situation required a clarification of notions and definitions. One can trace the use of the concept of “traditional values” in the Orthodox context with a high level of certainty. For several years (2000– 2012), it was used only by Metropolitan Kirill and a circle of publicists around the WRPC 1. Yet, even in this milieu, it took a while for the notion to take root. In an extended collection of articles and speeches published","PeriodicalId":319689,"journal":{"name":"Postsecular Conflict – Debating tradition in Russia and the United States","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rhetoric of Traditional Values in Contemporary Russia\",\"authors\":\"Sergey Chapnin\",\"doi\":\"10.15203/3187-99-3-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although the notion of “traditional values” has recently become popular in Russia, it is actually a new phenomenon in both religious and political discourse. In the 1990s, the most common and established use of the word “values” was with adjectives such as “spiritual” and “moral,” while the word “traditional” was mostly attributed to religions. In a certain sense, the very concept of “spiritual and moral values” was used as a transitory one. Having emerged between the 1980s and the 1990s as an antithesis to Communist values, this concept was nevertheless based on an understanding of spirituality that was exceptionally wide and could not be limited exclusively to the Orthodox framework. As a result, the new social and political situation required a clarification of notions and definitions. One can trace the use of the concept of “traditional values” in the Orthodox context with a high level of certainty. For several years (2000– 2012), it was used only by Metropolitan Kirill and a circle of publicists around the WRPC 1. Yet, even in this milieu, it took a while for the notion to take root. In an extended collection of articles and speeches published\",\"PeriodicalId\":319689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postsecular Conflict – Debating tradition in Russia and the United States\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postsecular Conflict – Debating tradition in Russia and the United States\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15203/3187-99-3-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postsecular Conflict – Debating tradition in Russia and the United States","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15203/3187-99-3-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

虽然“传统价值观”的概念最近在俄罗斯很流行,但它实际上是宗教和政治话语中的新现象。在20世纪90年代,“价值观”一词最常见和最确定的用法是与“精神”和“道德”等形容词一起使用,而“传统”一词主要归因于宗教。从某种意义上说,“精神和道德价值”这个概念本身就是一个暂时的概念。这个概念在20世纪80年代到90年代之间作为共产主义价值观的对立面出现,然而,它是基于对灵性的理解,这种理解非常广泛,不能仅限于东正教的框架。因此,新的社会和政治局势需要澄清概念和定义。人们可以高度肯定地追溯到东正教背景下“传统价值观”概念的使用。有好几年(2000年至2012年),它只被大都会基里尔和wrpc1周围的一群公关人员使用。然而,即使在这种环境下,这个概念也花了一段时间才扎根。出版了大量的文章和演讲
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Rhetoric of Traditional Values in Contemporary Russia
Although the notion of “traditional values” has recently become popular in Russia, it is actually a new phenomenon in both religious and political discourse. In the 1990s, the most common and established use of the word “values” was with adjectives such as “spiritual” and “moral,” while the word “traditional” was mostly attributed to religions. In a certain sense, the very concept of “spiritual and moral values” was used as a transitory one. Having emerged between the 1980s and the 1990s as an antithesis to Communist values, this concept was nevertheless based on an understanding of spirituality that was exceptionally wide and could not be limited exclusively to the Orthodox framework. As a result, the new social and political situation required a clarification of notions and definitions. One can trace the use of the concept of “traditional values” in the Orthodox context with a high level of certainty. For several years (2000– 2012), it was used only by Metropolitan Kirill and a circle of publicists around the WRPC 1. Yet, even in this milieu, it took a while for the notion to take root. In an extended collection of articles and speeches published
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Rhetoric of Traditional Values in Contemporary Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1