对言论自由、举报和政治活动的员工进行纪律处分

Helen LaVan, Marsha Katz
{"title":"对言论自由、举报和政治活动的员工进行纪律处分","authors":"Helen LaVan, Marsha Katz","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2612504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first part of this article reviews literature and case law on disciplining employees for free speech, whistle blowing, and political activities. It focuses on the extent to which an employer regulates off-the-job behaviors of its employees. Although this is not a treatise on the underlying law, the authors discuss constitutional law (especially the First Amendment), limitations on at-will employment, the Whistle Blowers Protection Act, and some state laws and the potential impact of these on the employer’s behavior. The second section reviews and analyzes the results of litigation over an eleven-year period to determine the win/lose rates in the relevant courtroom battles and whether those rates have changed with an increasingly protective public policy.","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disciplining Employees for Free Speech, Whistle Blowing, and Political Activities\",\"authors\":\"Helen LaVan, Marsha Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2612504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The first part of this article reviews literature and case law on disciplining employees for free speech, whistle blowing, and political activities. It focuses on the extent to which an employer regulates off-the-job behaviors of its employees. Although this is not a treatise on the underlying law, the authors discuss constitutional law (especially the First Amendment), limitations on at-will employment, the Whistle Blowers Protection Act, and some state laws and the potential impact of these on the employer’s behavior. The second section reviews and analyzes the results of litigation over an eleven-year period to determine the win/lose rates in the relevant courtroom battles and whether those rates have changed with an increasingly protective public policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2612504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2612504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的第一部分回顾了有关惩罚言论自由、举报和政治活动的雇员的文献和判例法。它关注的是雇主在多大程度上规范了员工的工作外行为。虽然这不是一篇关于基础法律的论文,但作者讨论了宪法(特别是第一修正案),对随意雇佣的限制,告密者保护法,以及一些州法律以及这些法律对雇主行为的潜在影响。第二部分回顾和分析了11年期间的诉讼结果,以确定相关法庭斗争中的胜败率,以及这些比率是否随着日益保护的公共政策而改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disciplining Employees for Free Speech, Whistle Blowing, and Political Activities
The first part of this article reviews literature and case law on disciplining employees for free speech, whistle blowing, and political activities. It focuses on the extent to which an employer regulates off-the-job behaviors of its employees. Although this is not a treatise on the underlying law, the authors discuss constitutional law (especially the First Amendment), limitations on at-will employment, the Whistle Blowers Protection Act, and some state laws and the potential impact of these on the employer’s behavior. The second section reviews and analyzes the results of litigation over an eleven-year period to determine the win/lose rates in the relevant courtroom battles and whether those rates have changed with an increasingly protective public policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Land Mines of the Family and Medical Leave Act Dress and Grooming Standards: How Legal are They? EQUAL PAY ACT CASES IN HIGHER EDUCATION Disparate Impact Discrimination and the ADEA: Coming of Age Disciplining Employees for Free Speech, Whistle Blowing, and Political Activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1