旅行小偷问题的社会启发算法

M. Bonyadi, Z. Michalewicz, M. Przybylek, A. Wierzbicki
{"title":"旅行小偷问题的社会启发算法","authors":"M. Bonyadi, Z. Michalewicz, M. Przybylek, A. Wierzbicki","doi":"10.1145/2576768.2598367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many real-world problems are composed of two or more problems that are interdependent on each other. The interaction of such problems usually is quite complex and solving each problem separately cannot guarantee the optimal solution for the overall multi-component problem. In this paper we experiment with one particular 2-component problem, namely the Traveling Thief Problem (TTP). TTP is composed of the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and the Knapsack Problem (KP). We investigate two heuristic methods to deal with TTP. In the first approach we decompose TTP into two sub-problems, solve them by separate modules/algorithms (that communicate with each other), and combine the solutions to obtain an overall approximated solution to TTP (this method is called CoSolver ). The second approach is a simple heuristic (called density-based heuristic, DH) method that generates a solution for the TSP component first (a version of Lin-Kernighan algorithm is used) and then, based on the fixed solution for the TSP component found, it generates a solution for the KP component (associated with the given TTP). In fact, this heuristic ignores the interdependency between sub-problems and tries to solve the sub-problems sequentially. These two methods are applied to some generated TTP instances of different sizes. Our comparisons show that CoSolver outperforms DH specially in large instances.","PeriodicalId":123241,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially inspired algorithms for the travelling thief problem\",\"authors\":\"M. Bonyadi, Z. Michalewicz, M. Przybylek, A. Wierzbicki\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2576768.2598367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many real-world problems are composed of two or more problems that are interdependent on each other. The interaction of such problems usually is quite complex and solving each problem separately cannot guarantee the optimal solution for the overall multi-component problem. In this paper we experiment with one particular 2-component problem, namely the Traveling Thief Problem (TTP). TTP is composed of the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and the Knapsack Problem (KP). We investigate two heuristic methods to deal with TTP. In the first approach we decompose TTP into two sub-problems, solve them by separate modules/algorithms (that communicate with each other), and combine the solutions to obtain an overall approximated solution to TTP (this method is called CoSolver ). The second approach is a simple heuristic (called density-based heuristic, DH) method that generates a solution for the TSP component first (a version of Lin-Kernighan algorithm is used) and then, based on the fixed solution for the TSP component found, it generates a solution for the KP component (associated with the given TTP). In fact, this heuristic ignores the interdependency between sub-problems and tries to solve the sub-problems sequentially. These two methods are applied to some generated TTP instances of different sizes. Our comparisons show that CoSolver outperforms DH specially in large instances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2576768.2598367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2576768.2598367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

许多现实世界的问题都是由两个或多个相互依赖的问题组成的。这类问题的相互作用通常非常复杂,单独解决每个问题并不能保证整体多组件问题的最优解。在本文中,我们实验了一个特殊的2分量问题,即旅行小偷问题(TTP)。TTP由旅行商问题(TSP)和背包问题(KP)组成。我们研究了两种启发式方法来处理TTP。在第一种方法中,我们将TTP分解为两个子问题,通过单独的模块/算法(相互通信)求解它们,并将解组合以获得TTP的整体近似解(这种方法称为CoSolver)。第二种方法是一种简单的启发式(称为基于密度的启发式,DH)方法,它首先生成TSP组件的解决方案(使用Lin-Kernighan算法的一个版本),然后,基于所找到的TSP组件的固定解决方案,它生成KP组件的解决方案(与给定的TTP相关)。实际上,这种启发式方法忽略了子问题之间的相互依赖性,并试图依次解决子问题。这两种方法应用于一些不同大小的生成的TTP实例。我们的比较表明,CoSolver尤其在大型实例中优于DH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Socially inspired algorithms for the travelling thief problem
Many real-world problems are composed of two or more problems that are interdependent on each other. The interaction of such problems usually is quite complex and solving each problem separately cannot guarantee the optimal solution for the overall multi-component problem. In this paper we experiment with one particular 2-component problem, namely the Traveling Thief Problem (TTP). TTP is composed of the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and the Knapsack Problem (KP). We investigate two heuristic methods to deal with TTP. In the first approach we decompose TTP into two sub-problems, solve them by separate modules/algorithms (that communicate with each other), and combine the solutions to obtain an overall approximated solution to TTP (this method is called CoSolver ). The second approach is a simple heuristic (called density-based heuristic, DH) method that generates a solution for the TSP component first (a version of Lin-Kernighan algorithm is used) and then, based on the fixed solution for the TSP component found, it generates a solution for the KP component (associated with the given TTP). In fact, this heuristic ignores the interdependency between sub-problems and tries to solve the sub-problems sequentially. These two methods are applied to some generated TTP instances of different sizes. Our comparisons show that CoSolver outperforms DH specially in large instances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-cornered coevolution learning classifier systems for classification tasks Runtime analysis to compare best-improvement and first-improvement in memetic algorithms Clonal selection based fuzzy C-means algorithm for clustering SPSO 2011: analysis of stability; local convergence; and rotation sensitivity GPU-accelerated evolutionary design of the complete exchange communication on wormhole networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1