上肢假体屈伸肌肌电图的比较研究

Shehla Inam, Faisal Amin, Muhammad Zia ur Rehman
{"title":"上肢假体屈伸肌肌电图的比较研究","authors":"Shehla Inam, Faisal Amin, Muhammad Zia ur Rehman","doi":"10.1109/ICOSST53930.2021.9683956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surface EMG is being used as a control source for myoelectric control of upper-limb prosthetics. There has been a concern whether there exists any difference in the EMG of males and females and the features that are proposed in research have been used generally for both males and females. This study aimed to evaluate any difference in EMG and compare the performance of different features for both male and female subjects. The EMG of 11 healthy males and females was recorded using BIOPAC by performing 11 basic hand movements with their dominant hand. The classification was performed using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and performing ANOVA tests for 13 basic features. Also, the graphical analysis of comparison of mean RMS values across each channel of each movement and the ANOVA tests for RMS values of males and females were performed. From classification results, it was found that there was no significant difference existed ($\\mathrm{p} > 0.05$) except for WL feature where classification accuracies of male subjects ($96.29\\pm 3.33$) were significantly higher ($\\mathrm{p} < 0.05$) than females subjects ($87.91\\pm 11.73$). The feature Mean Frequency achieved the highest classification accuracy for males and females ($97.63\\pm 1.76$ and $96.99 \\pm 1.57$) followed by AR as the second highest ($97.48\\pm 1.82$ and $96.96 \\pm 1.65$). Based on RMS of EMG signals, there was no significant difference found between the male and female subjects.","PeriodicalId":325357,"journal":{"name":"2021 15th International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (ICOSST)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Flexor and Extensor Muscles EMG for Upper Limb Prosthesis\",\"authors\":\"Shehla Inam, Faisal Amin, Muhammad Zia ur Rehman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICOSST53930.2021.9683956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surface EMG is being used as a control source for myoelectric control of upper-limb prosthetics. There has been a concern whether there exists any difference in the EMG of males and females and the features that are proposed in research have been used generally for both males and females. This study aimed to evaluate any difference in EMG and compare the performance of different features for both male and female subjects. The EMG of 11 healthy males and females was recorded using BIOPAC by performing 11 basic hand movements with their dominant hand. The classification was performed using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and performing ANOVA tests for 13 basic features. Also, the graphical analysis of comparison of mean RMS values across each channel of each movement and the ANOVA tests for RMS values of males and females were performed. From classification results, it was found that there was no significant difference existed ($\\\\mathrm{p} > 0.05$) except for WL feature where classification accuracies of male subjects ($96.29\\\\pm 3.33$) were significantly higher ($\\\\mathrm{p} < 0.05$) than females subjects ($87.91\\\\pm 11.73$). The feature Mean Frequency achieved the highest classification accuracy for males and females ($97.63\\\\pm 1.76$ and $96.99 \\\\pm 1.57$) followed by AR as the second highest ($97.48\\\\pm 1.82$ and $96.96 \\\\pm 1.65$). Based on RMS of EMG signals, there was no significant difference found between the male and female subjects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 15th International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (ICOSST)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 15th International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (ICOSST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSST53930.2021.9683956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 15th International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (ICOSST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSST53930.2021.9683956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

表面肌电信号正被用作上肢假肢肌电控制的控制源。人们一直关注男性和女性的肌电图是否存在差异,以及研究中提出的特征是否普遍适用于男性和女性。本研究旨在评估男性和女性受试者在肌电图上的差异,并比较不同特征的表现。采用BIOPAC对11名健康男性和女性的主手进行11个基本手部动作,记录其肌电图。使用人工神经网络(ANN)进行分类,并对13个基本特征进行方差分析(ANOVA)检验。对每次运动各通道均方根值的比较进行图形分析,并对男性和女性的均方根值进行方差分析。从分类结果来看,除了WL特征外,男性受试者的分类准确率($96.29\pm 3.33$)显著高于女性受试者($87.91\pm 11.73$) ($\mathrm{p} > 0.05$),两者之间没有显著差异($\mathrm{p} > 0.05$)。特征Mean Frequency对男性和女性的分类准确率最高(97.63\pm 1.76美元和96.99 \pm 1.57美元),其次是AR (97.48\pm 1.82美元和96.96 \pm 1.65美元)。从肌电信号的均方根值来看,男性和女性受试者之间无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study of Flexor and Extensor Muscles EMG for Upper Limb Prosthesis
Surface EMG is being used as a control source for myoelectric control of upper-limb prosthetics. There has been a concern whether there exists any difference in the EMG of males and females and the features that are proposed in research have been used generally for both males and females. This study aimed to evaluate any difference in EMG and compare the performance of different features for both male and female subjects. The EMG of 11 healthy males and females was recorded using BIOPAC by performing 11 basic hand movements with their dominant hand. The classification was performed using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and performing ANOVA tests for 13 basic features. Also, the graphical analysis of comparison of mean RMS values across each channel of each movement and the ANOVA tests for RMS values of males and females were performed. From classification results, it was found that there was no significant difference existed ($\mathrm{p} > 0.05$) except for WL feature where classification accuracies of male subjects ($96.29\pm 3.33$) were significantly higher ($\mathrm{p} < 0.05$) than females subjects ($87.91\pm 11.73$). The feature Mean Frequency achieved the highest classification accuracy for males and females ($97.63\pm 1.76$ and $96.99 \pm 1.57$) followed by AR as the second highest ($97.48\pm 1.82$ and $96.96 \pm 1.65$). Based on RMS of EMG signals, there was no significant difference found between the male and female subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Question Answer Re-Ranking using Syntactic Relationship IoT based Smart Fan Dimmer with suppressed Humming Sound and Nonlinear Effect of Inverter Detection of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease by Squeeze-and-Excitation Convolutional Neural Network with Wearable Sensors A Bag-of-Features (BoF) Based Novel Framework for the Detection of COVID-19 An efficient rating system for players based on their position statistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1