定价中的信息和准确性:来自NCAA男子篮球博彩市场的证据

Jason P. Berkowitz, C. Depken, J. Gandar
{"title":"定价中的信息和准确性:来自NCAA男子篮球博彩市场的证据","authors":"Jason P. Berkowitz, C. Depken, J. Gandar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2024252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we test whether accuracy in the wagering markets for NCAA Division I men׳s basketball improves when there are more betting lines available for a given game. The empirical evidence indicates that when the money line is offered, it has no impact on the accuracy of the sides line as it is a redundant security, but the offering of the totals line impacts the accuracy of the sides line. We interpret this as evidence that the totals line provides additional information to uninformed bettors that improves the accuracy of the sides line in its role as a price.","PeriodicalId":364403,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Sports Economics (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information and Accuracy in Pricing: Evidence from the NCAA Men’s Basketball Betting Market\",\"authors\":\"Jason P. Berkowitz, C. Depken, J. Gandar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2024252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we test whether accuracy in the wagering markets for NCAA Division I men׳s basketball improves when there are more betting lines available for a given game. The empirical evidence indicates that when the money line is offered, it has no impact on the accuracy of the sides line as it is a redundant security, but the offering of the totals line impacts the accuracy of the sides line. We interpret this as evidence that the totals line provides additional information to uninformed bettors that improves the accuracy of the sides line in its role as a price.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Sports Economics (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Sports Economics (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2024252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Sports Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2024252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在本文中,我们检验了当有更多的投注线可用于给定的比赛时,NCAA甲级男子篮球投注市场的准确性是否提高。经验证据表明,当提供金钱线时,它对边线的准确性没有影响,因为它是一种冗余证券,但提供总额线会影响边线的准确性。我们将此解释为总计线为不知情的投注者提供了额外信息的证据,从而提高了边线作为价格的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Information and Accuracy in Pricing: Evidence from the NCAA Men’s Basketball Betting Market
In this paper, we test whether accuracy in the wagering markets for NCAA Division I men׳s basketball improves when there are more betting lines available for a given game. The empirical evidence indicates that when the money line is offered, it has no impact on the accuracy of the sides line as it is a redundant security, but the offering of the totals line impacts the accuracy of the sides line. We interpret this as evidence that the totals line provides additional information to uninformed bettors that improves the accuracy of the sides line in its role as a price.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information and Accuracy in Pricing: Evidence from the NCAA Men’s Basketball Betting Market Clustering of College Football Spreads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1