基于用户配置文件的SPL成对测试优先级排序方法

Hirofumi Akimoto, Yuto Isogami, Takashi Kitamura, N. Noda, T. Kishi
{"title":"基于用户配置文件的SPL成对测试优先级排序方法","authors":"Hirofumi Akimoto, Yuto Isogami, Takashi Kitamura, N. Noda, T. Kishi","doi":"10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Software Product Line (SPL) development, one of promising techniques for core asset testing is to test a subset of SPL as representative products. SPL pairwise testing is a such technique in which each product corresponds to a possible feature configuration in the feature model (FM) and representative products are selected so as to all possible feature pairs are included. It is also important to prioritize representative products, because it could improve the effectiveness of core asset testing especially when the testing resource is limited. In this paper, we propose a prioritization method for SPL pairwise testing based on user profiles. A user profile is a set of user groups and their occurrence probabilities such as the percentages of user groups in a market that use specific devices, applications or services. These profiles are used as the probabilities of feature choices at decision points such as optional features and alternative features in a FM. Based on that, we calculate the probability for obtaining a feature pairs (PFP for short), and generate representative products with priority. Most researches relate to the probabilities about FM handle the probability for obtaining a single feature (PSF for short). Based on PSF, we could estimate PFP. However, this estimation is not appropriate for the prioritization especially when conditional probabilities appear in user profiles. In our method, we directly calculate PFP and determine the priorities. We evaluate the method to show advantages of prioritizations using PFP over those using PSF, and also analyze the characteristics of the method.","PeriodicalId":325642,"journal":{"name":"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prioritization Method for SPL Pairwise Testing Based on User Profiles\",\"authors\":\"Hirofumi Akimoto, Yuto Isogami, Takashi Kitamura, N. Noda, T. Kishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Software Product Line (SPL) development, one of promising techniques for core asset testing is to test a subset of SPL as representative products. SPL pairwise testing is a such technique in which each product corresponds to a possible feature configuration in the feature model (FM) and representative products are selected so as to all possible feature pairs are included. It is also important to prioritize representative products, because it could improve the effectiveness of core asset testing especially when the testing resource is limited. In this paper, we propose a prioritization method for SPL pairwise testing based on user profiles. A user profile is a set of user groups and their occurrence probabilities such as the percentages of user groups in a market that use specific devices, applications or services. These profiles are used as the probabilities of feature choices at decision points such as optional features and alternative features in a FM. Based on that, we calculate the probability for obtaining a feature pairs (PFP for short), and generate representative products with priority. Most researches relate to the probabilities about FM handle the probability for obtaining a single feature (PSF for short). Based on PSF, we could estimate PFP. However, this estimation is not appropriate for the prioritization especially when conditional probabilities appear in user profiles. In our method, we directly calculate PFP and determine the priorities. We evaluate the method to show advantages of prioritizations using PFP over those using PSF, and also analyze the characteristics of the method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在软件产品线(SPL)开发中,一个很有前途的核心资产测试技术是将SPL的一个子集作为代表性产品进行测试。SPL成对测试是一种将每个产品对应于特征模型(FM)中可能的特征配置,并选择有代表性的产品,从而包括所有可能的特征对的技术。确定代表性产品的优先级也很重要,因为它可以提高核心资产测试的有效性,尤其是在测试资源有限的情况下。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于用户配置文件的SPL成对测试的优先级方法。用户配置文件是一组用户组及其出现概率,例如在市场中使用特定设备、应用程序或服务的用户组的百分比。这些概要文件用作决策点(如FM中的可选特征和可选特征)的特征选择概率。在此基础上,计算获得特征对的概率(简称PFP),生成具有优先级的代表性产品。大多数关于调频概率的研究都是处理获得单个特征的概率(简称PSF)。基于PSF,我们可以估计PFP。然而,这种估计不适用于优先级排序,特别是当条件概率出现在用户配置文件中时。在我们的方法中,我们直接计算PFP并确定优先级。我们对该方法进行了评估,以显示使用PFP的优先级优于使用PSF的优先级,并分析了该方法的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Prioritization Method for SPL Pairwise Testing Based on User Profiles
In Software Product Line (SPL) development, one of promising techniques for core asset testing is to test a subset of SPL as representative products. SPL pairwise testing is a such technique in which each product corresponds to a possible feature configuration in the feature model (FM) and representative products are selected so as to all possible feature pairs are included. It is also important to prioritize representative products, because it could improve the effectiveness of core asset testing especially when the testing resource is limited. In this paper, we propose a prioritization method for SPL pairwise testing based on user profiles. A user profile is a set of user groups and their occurrence probabilities such as the percentages of user groups in a market that use specific devices, applications or services. These profiles are used as the probabilities of feature choices at decision points such as optional features and alternative features in a FM. Based on that, we calculate the probability for obtaining a feature pairs (PFP for short), and generate representative products with priority. Most researches relate to the probabilities about FM handle the probability for obtaining a single feature (PSF for short). Based on PSF, we could estimate PFP. However, this estimation is not appropriate for the prioritization especially when conditional probabilities appear in user profiles. In our method, we directly calculate PFP and determine the priorities. We evaluate the method to show advantages of prioritizations using PFP over those using PSF, and also analyze the characteristics of the method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detecting Duplicate Questions in Stack Overflow via Deep Learning Approaches An Algebraic Approach to Modeling and Verifying Policy-Driven Smart Devices in IoT Systems Integrating Static Program Analysis Tools for Verifying Cautions of Microcontroller How Compact Will My System Be? A Fully-Automated Way to Calculate LoC Reduced by Clone Refactoring Neural Comment Generation for Source Code with Auxiliary Code Classification Task
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1