{"title":"分区测试不能激发信心","authors":"R. Hamlet, R. Taylor","doi":"10.1109/WST.1988.5376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors improve the negative results published about partition testing and try to reconcile them with its intuitively perceived value. Partition testing is shown to be more valuable than random testing only when the partitions are narrowly based on expected faults and there is a good chance of failure. For gaining confidence for successful tests, partition testing as usually practiced has little value.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":269073,"journal":{"name":"[1988] Proceedings. Second Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis","volume":"2011 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"512","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partition testing does not inspire confidence\",\"authors\":\"R. Hamlet, R. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WST.1988.5376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors improve the negative results published about partition testing and try to reconcile them with its intuitively perceived value. Partition testing is shown to be more valuable than random testing only when the partitions are narrowly based on expected faults and there is a good chance of failure. For gaining confidence for successful tests, partition testing as usually practiced has little value.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":269073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1988] Proceedings. Second Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"2011 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"512\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1988] Proceedings. Second Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WST.1988.5376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1988] Proceedings. Second Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WST.1988.5376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The authors improve the negative results published about partition testing and try to reconcile them with its intuitively perceived value. Partition testing is shown to be more valuable than random testing only when the partitions are narrowly based on expected faults and there is a good chance of failure. For gaining confidence for successful tests, partition testing as usually practiced has little value.<>
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
![[1988] Proceedings. Second Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis](/Content/css/sci/img/zetp.jpg)
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
