{"title":"格兰德河谷下游原生植被的恢复,1984- 1987","authors":"R. Vora","doi":"10.3368/er.10.2.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Photo: Native vegetation in the central portion of the Lower Rio Grande Valley: \"..,the dense brush that comprises part of this ecosystem provides food, nest sites, and cover for many wildlife species, including the endangered ocelot and jaguarundi,\" Photo courtesy of Robin Vora W ith elimination of 95 percent of the native woodlands of the lower Rio Grande Valley, maintenance of habitat for more than 500 vertebrate species (Jahrsdoerfer and Leslie, 1988) now depends on land acquisition and restoration of native vegetation on recently-cultivated fields. Little is known, however, about propagation and establishment of many of the native species. Riskind et a!. (1987) reported on early efforts by Texas Parks and Wildlife to establish five native woody species by transplanting from existing native stands, on planting techniques used with nursery-grown seedlings in the mid-1980s, and on cooperative farm agreeraents used by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to accomplish restoration planting. This article is a follow-up to that report. I concentrate on results of experiments and field trials conducted between 1984 and 1987 while I was working as an ecologist for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge, near Alamo, Texas. I also include updates based on personal communication with the present ecologist, Chris Best. Jahrsdoerfer and Leslie (1988) and others described the Lower Rio Grande Valley as a unique ecosystem in the United States.","PeriodicalId":105419,"journal":{"name":"Restoration & Management Notes","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restoration of Native Vegetation in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, 1984-87\",\"authors\":\"R. Vora\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/er.10.2.150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Photo: Native vegetation in the central portion of the Lower Rio Grande Valley: \\\"..,the dense brush that comprises part of this ecosystem provides food, nest sites, and cover for many wildlife species, including the endangered ocelot and jaguarundi,\\\" Photo courtesy of Robin Vora W ith elimination of 95 percent of the native woodlands of the lower Rio Grande Valley, maintenance of habitat for more than 500 vertebrate species (Jahrsdoerfer and Leslie, 1988) now depends on land acquisition and restoration of native vegetation on recently-cultivated fields. Little is known, however, about propagation and establishment of many of the native species. Riskind et a!. (1987) reported on early efforts by Texas Parks and Wildlife to establish five native woody species by transplanting from existing native stands, on planting techniques used with nursery-grown seedlings in the mid-1980s, and on cooperative farm agreeraents used by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to accomplish restoration planting. This article is a follow-up to that report. I concentrate on results of experiments and field trials conducted between 1984 and 1987 while I was working as an ecologist for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge, near Alamo, Texas. I also include updates based on personal communication with the present ecologist, Chris Best. Jahrsdoerfer and Leslie (1988) and others described the Lower Rio Grande Valley as a unique ecosystem in the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restoration & Management Notes\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restoration & Management Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.10.2.150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration & Management Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.10.2.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
图片:下里约热内卢格兰德山谷中部的原生植被:“……在美国,茂密的灌木丛构成了这一生态系统的一部分,为许多野生动物提供了食物、筑巢地点和掩护,包括濒危的豹猫和美洲虎。”罗宾·沃拉·W的照片由罗宾·沃拉·W提供。随着格兰德山谷下游95%的原生林地的消失,500多种脊椎动物的栖息地的维护(Jahrsdoerfer和Leslie, 1988)现在依赖于土地收购和恢复新开垦的土地上的原生植被。然而,人们对许多本地物种的繁殖和建立知之甚少。Riskind et a!(1987)报道了德克萨斯州公园和野生动物通过从现有的本地林分移植来建立五种本地木本物种的早期努力,20世纪80年代中期使用苗圃种植幼苗的种植技术,以及美国鱼类和野生动物管理局使用的合作农场协议来完成恢复种植。这篇文章是那篇报道的后续文章。我专注于1984年至1987年间进行的实验和实地试验的结果,当时我是美国鱼类和野生动物管理局的生态学家,在德克萨斯州阿拉莫附近的里约热内卢格兰德谷国家野生动物保护区工作。我还包括了基于与现任生态学家克里斯·贝斯特的个人交流的更新。Jahrsdoerfer和Leslie(1988)等人将下里约热内卢格兰德河谷描述为美国独特的生态系统。
Restoration of Native Vegetation in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, 1984-87
Photo: Native vegetation in the central portion of the Lower Rio Grande Valley: "..,the dense brush that comprises part of this ecosystem provides food, nest sites, and cover for many wildlife species, including the endangered ocelot and jaguarundi," Photo courtesy of Robin Vora W ith elimination of 95 percent of the native woodlands of the lower Rio Grande Valley, maintenance of habitat for more than 500 vertebrate species (Jahrsdoerfer and Leslie, 1988) now depends on land acquisition and restoration of native vegetation on recently-cultivated fields. Little is known, however, about propagation and establishment of many of the native species. Riskind et a!. (1987) reported on early efforts by Texas Parks and Wildlife to establish five native woody species by transplanting from existing native stands, on planting techniques used with nursery-grown seedlings in the mid-1980s, and on cooperative farm agreeraents used by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to accomplish restoration planting. This article is a follow-up to that report. I concentrate on results of experiments and field trials conducted between 1984 and 1987 while I was working as an ecologist for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge, near Alamo, Texas. I also include updates based on personal communication with the present ecologist, Chris Best. Jahrsdoerfer and Leslie (1988) and others described the Lower Rio Grande Valley as a unique ecosystem in the United States.