动物研究的系统回顾-国际研讨会报告

Fausak Erik, Melissa C. Funaro, Andrea Kepsel, Erin R B Eldermire, M. Foster, H. Norton, Kim Mears, Molly Crews, M. Brennan, Gillian L. Currie, Megan R. LaFollette, Annette O'Connor, Adrian J. Smith, Kimberely Wever, Suzanne Fricke
{"title":"动物研究的系统回顾-国际研讨会报告","authors":"Fausak Erik, Melissa C. Funaro, Andrea Kepsel, Erin R B Eldermire, M. Foster, H. Norton, Kim Mears, Molly Crews, M. Brennan, Gillian L. Currie, Megan R. LaFollette, Annette O'Connor, Adrian J. Smith, Kimberely Wever, Suzanne Fricke","doi":"10.18849/ve.v8i3.653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The Symposium on Animal Systematic Reviews held 24 May 2022, sought to bring organisations working on animal literature searching and systematic reviews together into the same virtual space for introductions and discussion.\nBackground: Groups working on animal research synthesis are often siloed into preclinical, veterinary, and One Health settings. This symposium sought to define commonalities and differences in methodologies, resources, and philosophies and to discuss future needs.\nMethods: The 3-hour virtual symposium for veterinarians, researchers, and information specialists began with introductions by panelists from organisations involved in searching the literature for animal studies and conducting systematic reviews. This was followed by a panel discussion and question and answer period.\nResults: Panelists identified a need to ensure planning and accurate description of primary animal studies as a precursor to quality systematic reviews. They acknowledged and discussed differences in evidence synthesis expectations and tools based on the type of review, the types of studies available on the topic, and the focus on preclinical, veterinary, or One Health topics.\nConclusion: The need to increase the speed and quality of evidence reviews, and to automate updates, requires investing in the development of both skilled teams and platforms. The symposium provided a chance to identify existing resources, define challenges, and note gaps unique to systematic reviews of animal studies.\nApplication: This symposium acts as a baseline for ongoing discussions centred on improving the culture and pipeline for evidence syntheses of animal studies that inform decision-making.","PeriodicalId":257905,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Evidence","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic reviews of animal studies – Report of an international symposium\",\"authors\":\"Fausak Erik, Melissa C. Funaro, Andrea Kepsel, Erin R B Eldermire, M. Foster, H. Norton, Kim Mears, Molly Crews, M. Brennan, Gillian L. Currie, Megan R. LaFollette, Annette O'Connor, Adrian J. Smith, Kimberely Wever, Suzanne Fricke\",\"doi\":\"10.18849/ve.v8i3.653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The Symposium on Animal Systematic Reviews held 24 May 2022, sought to bring organisations working on animal literature searching and systematic reviews together into the same virtual space for introductions and discussion.\\nBackground: Groups working on animal research synthesis are often siloed into preclinical, veterinary, and One Health settings. This symposium sought to define commonalities and differences in methodologies, resources, and philosophies and to discuss future needs.\\nMethods: The 3-hour virtual symposium for veterinarians, researchers, and information specialists began with introductions by panelists from organisations involved in searching the literature for animal studies and conducting systematic reviews. This was followed by a panel discussion and question and answer period.\\nResults: Panelists identified a need to ensure planning and accurate description of primary animal studies as a precursor to quality systematic reviews. They acknowledged and discussed differences in evidence synthesis expectations and tools based on the type of review, the types of studies available on the topic, and the focus on preclinical, veterinary, or One Health topics.\\nConclusion: The need to increase the speed and quality of evidence reviews, and to automate updates, requires investing in the development of both skilled teams and platforms. The symposium provided a chance to identify existing resources, define challenges, and note gaps unique to systematic reviews of animal studies.\\nApplication: This symposium acts as a baseline for ongoing discussions centred on improving the culture and pipeline for evidence syntheses of animal studies that inform decision-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Evidence\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i3.653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i3.653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2022年5月24日举行的动物系统评论研讨会,旨在将从事动物文献检索和系统评论的组织聚集在同一个虚拟空间中进行介绍和讨论。背景:从事动物研究合成的小组通常被隔离在临床前、兽医和单一健康环境中。本次研讨会旨在确定方法、资源和理念方面的共性和差异,并讨论未来的需求。方法:兽医、研究人员和信息专家参加了为期3小时的虚拟研讨会,由参与动物研究文献检索和系统综述的组织的小组成员介绍开始。随后是小组讨论和问答环节。结果:小组成员确定需要确保计划和准确描述初步动物研究,作为高质量系统评价的先驱。他们承认并讨论了证据综合期望和工具的差异,这些差异基于综述的类型、该主题的现有研究类型以及对临床前、兽医或单一健康主题的关注。结论:提高证据审查的速度和质量,并实现自动更新,需要投资于技术团队和平台的发展。研讨会提供了一个机会来确定现有资源,确定挑战,并注意到动物研究系统综述所特有的差距。应用:本次研讨会将作为正在进行的讨论的基础,这些讨论集中在改善动物研究的培养和证据合成渠道,从而为决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic reviews of animal studies – Report of an international symposium
Objective: The Symposium on Animal Systematic Reviews held 24 May 2022, sought to bring organisations working on animal literature searching and systematic reviews together into the same virtual space for introductions and discussion. Background: Groups working on animal research synthesis are often siloed into preclinical, veterinary, and One Health settings. This symposium sought to define commonalities and differences in methodologies, resources, and philosophies and to discuss future needs. Methods: The 3-hour virtual symposium for veterinarians, researchers, and information specialists began with introductions by panelists from organisations involved in searching the literature for animal studies and conducting systematic reviews. This was followed by a panel discussion and question and answer period. Results: Panelists identified a need to ensure planning and accurate description of primary animal studies as a precursor to quality systematic reviews. They acknowledged and discussed differences in evidence synthesis expectations and tools based on the type of review, the types of studies available on the topic, and the focus on preclinical, veterinary, or One Health topics. Conclusion: The need to increase the speed and quality of evidence reviews, and to automate updates, requires investing in the development of both skilled teams and platforms. The symposium provided a chance to identify existing resources, define challenges, and note gaps unique to systematic reviews of animal studies. Application: This symposium acts as a baseline for ongoing discussions centred on improving the culture and pipeline for evidence syntheses of animal studies that inform decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum to: Comparing the effectiveness of clomipramine and fluoxetine in dogs with anxiety-related behaviours In dogs with thoracolumbar disc extrusion does the use of acupuncture improve clinical recovery? Effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in cats with chronic gingivostomatitis Effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in cats with chronic gingivostomatitis Does local anaesthetic reduce pain in rubber ring castration of neonatal lambs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1