电气安全测试的未来趋势-生产电气安全测试

Nicholas Piotrowski
{"title":"电气安全测试的未来趋势-生产电气安全测试","authors":"Nicholas Piotrowski","doi":"10.1109/ISPCE.2016.7492840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A common trend in electrical safety testing over the last several years is more stringent production line testing. Generally, only dielectric withstand and continuity tests are run as 100% routine production line testing. Equipment manufacturers have shifted away from these tests in favor of additional testing. The reason is manufacturers are performing risk analysis on product assembly procedures and determining that extra safety tests are warranted as a means of risk mitigation. New generations of production line test systems are more similar to laboratory testing systems. As a result, the more traditional laboratory testing requires a more streamlined setup to be effectively integrated into an automated setting.","PeriodicalId":107512,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future trends of electrical safety testing — Production electrical safety testing\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Piotrowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPCE.2016.7492840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A common trend in electrical safety testing over the last several years is more stringent production line testing. Generally, only dielectric withstand and continuity tests are run as 100% routine production line testing. Equipment manufacturers have shifted away from these tests in favor of additional testing. The reason is manufacturers are performing risk analysis on product assembly procedures and determining that extra safety tests are warranted as a means of risk mitigation. New generations of production line test systems are more similar to laboratory testing systems. As a result, the more traditional laboratory testing requires a more streamlined setup to be effectively integrated into an automated setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPCE.2016.7492840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPCE.2016.7492840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去几年中,电气安全测试的一个共同趋势是更严格的生产线测试。一般来说,只有耐介质和连续性测试作为100%的常规生产线测试进行。设备制造商已经从这些测试转向额外的测试。原因是制造商正在对产品装配程序进行风险分析,并确定有必要进行额外的安全测试,作为降低风险的一种手段。新一代的生产线测试系统更类似于实验室测试系统。因此,更传统的实验室测试需要更精简的设置,以便有效地集成到自动化设置中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Future trends of electrical safety testing — Production electrical safety testing
A common trend in electrical safety testing over the last several years is more stringent production line testing. Generally, only dielectric withstand and continuity tests are run as 100% routine production line testing. Equipment manufacturers have shifted away from these tests in favor of additional testing. The reason is manufacturers are performing risk analysis on product assembly procedures and determining that extra safety tests are warranted as a means of risk mitigation. New generations of production line test systems are more similar to laboratory testing systems. As a result, the more traditional laboratory testing requires a more streamlined setup to be effectively integrated into an automated setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantified fault tree techniques for calculating hardware fault metrics according to ISO 26262 Preventing potential fires and hazardous situations in consumer products Product safety testing using induced corona detection Self-authentication in medical device software: An approach to include cybersecurity in legacy medical devices Model name strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1