国际会计准则在增值税领域的影响:欧洲法院最近的一项判决及其对增值税实践的影响

Michel Lambion
{"title":"国际会计准则在增值税领域的影响:欧洲法院最近的一项判决及其对增值税实践的影响","authors":"Michel Lambion","doi":"10.5235/WJOVL.1.2.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The influence of international accounting standards (IAS), now known as IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards), on the question whether certain operations fall within the scope of VAT may be surprising at first sight. Indeed, they are supposedly two distinct disciplines, two autonomous sets of rules with diverging scopes: IFRS apply primarily to consolidated accounts of publicly traded companies, while VAT applies to taxable persons undertaking economic activities. Until recently, this assumption seemed uncontroversial as far as the tax and accounting community was concerned—to such a degree that the question of a possible influence of IFRS on VAT did not even occur. Nevertheless, a recent decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) dated 16 February 2012 stirred up trouble between these two sets of rules. In this ruling the ECJ developed an argument, based on IAS 17, concerning leasing agreements, to render an operation which would usually be analysed as a supply of services, as a supply of goods under the VAT Directive. Is it possible that this is a stand-alone case, which we could call a ‘glitch’ or a ‘case-law mishap’? Or is it the beginning of a new trend, where VAT practitioners will systematically search IFRS to find a practical solution to a harmonised interpretation of VAT at the European level, based on an economic approach as opposed to a more legal approach, as it currently stands? The aims of this article are to analyse the aforementioned ruling, to assess the consequences of a generalised application of the IFRS rules in VAT law, and, finally, to show the intrinsic limits of such an approach. To better understand the importance of this ruling and its potential application to IFRS, this article also provides a reminder of the VAT harmonisation process and its difficulties, and outlines the importance of the connection between the VAT declaration process and the accounting principles of LuxGAAP.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of international accounting standards in the field of VAT: a recent ECJ judgment and its impact on VAT practice\",\"authors\":\"Michel Lambion\",\"doi\":\"10.5235/WJOVL.1.2.158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The influence of international accounting standards (IAS), now known as IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards), on the question whether certain operations fall within the scope of VAT may be surprising at first sight. Indeed, they are supposedly two distinct disciplines, two autonomous sets of rules with diverging scopes: IFRS apply primarily to consolidated accounts of publicly traded companies, while VAT applies to taxable persons undertaking economic activities. Until recently, this assumption seemed uncontroversial as far as the tax and accounting community was concerned—to such a degree that the question of a possible influence of IFRS on VAT did not even occur. Nevertheless, a recent decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) dated 16 February 2012 stirred up trouble between these two sets of rules. In this ruling the ECJ developed an argument, based on IAS 17, concerning leasing agreements, to render an operation which would usually be analysed as a supply of services, as a supply of goods under the VAT Directive. Is it possible that this is a stand-alone case, which we could call a ‘glitch’ or a ‘case-law mishap’? Or is it the beginning of a new trend, where VAT practitioners will systematically search IFRS to find a practical solution to a harmonised interpretation of VAT at the European level, based on an economic approach as opposed to a more legal approach, as it currently stands? The aims of this article are to analyse the aforementioned ruling, to assess the consequences of a generalised application of the IFRS rules in VAT law, and, finally, to show the intrinsic limits of such an approach. To better understand the importance of this ruling and its potential application to IFRS, this article also provides a reminder of the VAT harmonisation process and its difficulties, and outlines the importance of the connection between the VAT declaration process and the accounting principles of LuxGAAP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5235/WJOVL.1.2.158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/WJOVL.1.2.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

国际会计准则(IAS),现在被称为IFRS(国际财务报告准则),对某些业务是否属于增值税范围的问题的影响乍一看可能令人惊讶。事实上,它们被认为是两个不同的学科,两套独立的规则,范围不同:国际财务报告准则主要适用于上市公司的合并账户,而增值税适用于从事经济活动的应纳税人员。直到最近,就税务和会计界而言,这一假设似乎没有争议,以至于国际财务报告准则对增值税可能产生的影响的问题甚至没有发生。然而,欧洲法院(ECJ)最近于2012年2月16日做出的一项决定激起了这两套规则之间的矛盾。在这一裁决中,欧洲法院根据国际会计准则第17号(IAS 17)提出了一个关于租赁协议的论点,将通常被分析为服务供应的业务,作为增值税指令下的货物供应。有没有可能这是一个独立的案例,我们可以称之为“小故障”或“判例法事故”?或者这是一个新趋势的开始,增值税从业者将系统地搜索国际财务报告准则,以找到一个实用的解决方案,以在欧洲层面上统一解释增值税,基于经济方法,而不是更法律的方法,因为它目前的立场?本文的目的是分析上述裁决,评估在增值税法律中普遍应用国际财务报告准则规则的后果,最后,显示这种方法的内在限制。为了更好地理解这一裁决的重要性及其对国际财务报告准则的潜在应用,本文还提供了增值税协调过程及其困难的提醒,并概述了增值税申报过程与LuxGAAP会计原则之间联系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of international accounting standards in the field of VAT: a recent ECJ judgment and its impact on VAT practice
The influence of international accounting standards (IAS), now known as IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards), on the question whether certain operations fall within the scope of VAT may be surprising at first sight. Indeed, they are supposedly two distinct disciplines, two autonomous sets of rules with diverging scopes: IFRS apply primarily to consolidated accounts of publicly traded companies, while VAT applies to taxable persons undertaking economic activities. Until recently, this assumption seemed uncontroversial as far as the tax and accounting community was concerned—to such a degree that the question of a possible influence of IFRS on VAT did not even occur. Nevertheless, a recent decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) dated 16 February 2012 stirred up trouble between these two sets of rules. In this ruling the ECJ developed an argument, based on IAS 17, concerning leasing agreements, to render an operation which would usually be analysed as a supply of services, as a supply of goods under the VAT Directive. Is it possible that this is a stand-alone case, which we could call a ‘glitch’ or a ‘case-law mishap’? Or is it the beginning of a new trend, where VAT practitioners will systematically search IFRS to find a practical solution to a harmonised interpretation of VAT at the European level, based on an economic approach as opposed to a more legal approach, as it currently stands? The aims of this article are to analyse the aforementioned ruling, to assess the consequences of a generalised application of the IFRS rules in VAT law, and, finally, to show the intrinsic limits of such an approach. To better understand the importance of this ruling and its potential application to IFRS, this article also provides a reminder of the VAT harmonisation process and its difficulties, and outlines the importance of the connection between the VAT declaration process and the accounting principles of LuxGAAP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equality under State aid rules and VAT The direct and immediate link with specialised services contracts as a measure for the right to deduct input VAT and the uncertainty in European tax law VAT deduction and member state sovereignty: (still) a good idea? EU VAT at the dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution* VAT information asymmetries in the context of intra-EU trade in goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1