探索性测试人员需要正式培训吗?一项使用HCI技术的调查

Mark Micallef, C. Porter, A. Borg
{"title":"探索性测试人员需要正式培训吗?一项使用HCI技术的调查","authors":"Mark Micallef, C. Porter, A. Borg","doi":"10.1109/ICSTW.2016.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exploratory software testing is an activity which can be carried out by both untrained and formally trained testers. We personify the former as Carmen and the latter as George. In this paper, we outline a joint research exercise between industry and academia that contributes to the body of knowledge by (1) proposing a data gathering and processing methodology which leverages HCI techniques to characterise the differences in strategies utilised by Carmen and George when approaching an exploratory testing task, and (2) present the findings of an initial study amongst twenty participants, ten formally trained testers and another ten with no formal training. Our results shed light on the types of strategies used by each type of tester, how they are used, the effectiveness of each type of strategy in terms of finding bugs, and the types of bugs each tester/strategy combination uncovers. We also demonstrate how our methodology can be used to help assemble and manage exploratory testing teams in the real world.","PeriodicalId":335145,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Exploratory Testers Need Formal Training? An Investigation Using HCI Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Mark Micallef, C. Porter, A. Borg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSTW.2016.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Exploratory software testing is an activity which can be carried out by both untrained and formally trained testers. We personify the former as Carmen and the latter as George. In this paper, we outline a joint research exercise between industry and academia that contributes to the body of knowledge by (1) proposing a data gathering and processing methodology which leverages HCI techniques to characterise the differences in strategies utilised by Carmen and George when approaching an exploratory testing task, and (2) present the findings of an initial study amongst twenty participants, ten formally trained testers and another ten with no formal training. Our results shed light on the types of strategies used by each type of tester, how they are used, the effectiveness of each type of strategy in terms of finding bugs, and the types of bugs each tester/strategy combination uncovers. We also demonstrate how our methodology can be used to help assemble and manage exploratory testing teams in the real world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2016.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2016.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

探索性软件测试是一种既可以由未经培训的测试人员进行,也可以由经过正式培训的测试人员进行的活动。我们把前者拟人化为卡门,把后者拟人化为乔治。在本文中,我们概述了工业界和学术界之间的联合研究活动,通过(1)提出一种数据收集和处理方法,该方法利用HCI技术来描述Carmen和George在接近探索性测试任务时使用的策略的差异,以及(2)在20名参与者中提出初步研究的结果,其中10名经过正式培训的测试人员和另外10名未经过正式培训的测试人员。我们的结果揭示了每种测试人员使用的策略类型,它们是如何被使用的,每种策略在发现错误方面的有效性,以及每种测试人员/策略组合所发现的错误类型。我们还演示了如何使用我们的方法来帮助在现实世界中组建和管理探索性测试团队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Exploratory Testers Need Formal Training? An Investigation Using HCI Techniques
Exploratory software testing is an activity which can be carried out by both untrained and formally trained testers. We personify the former as Carmen and the latter as George. In this paper, we outline a joint research exercise between industry and academia that contributes to the body of knowledge by (1) proposing a data gathering and processing methodology which leverages HCI techniques to characterise the differences in strategies utilised by Carmen and George when approaching an exploratory testing task, and (2) present the findings of an initial study amongst twenty participants, ten formally trained testers and another ten with no formal training. Our results shed light on the types of strategies used by each type of tester, how they are used, the effectiveness of each type of strategy in terms of finding bugs, and the types of bugs each tester/strategy combination uncovers. We also demonstrate how our methodology can be used to help assemble and manage exploratory testing teams in the real world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nequivack: Assessing Mutation Score Confidence A Tool for Automated Inspection of Software Design Documents and Its Empirical Evaluation in an Aviation Industry Setting Difference in Quality of Test Architecture between Service Providers and Subcontractors Diversity-Aware Mutation Adequacy Criterion for Improving Fault Detection Capability Are We There Yet? How Redundant and Equivalent Mutants Affect Determination of Test Completeness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1