联邦德国宪法法院判例与欧盟法

Ayşe Füsun Arsava
{"title":"联邦德国宪法法院判例与欧盟法","authors":"Ayşe Füsun Arsava","doi":"10.54049/taad.1139315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Federal German Constitutional Court has a leading role in EU Law with its jurisprudence. Solange I” decision of 1974, “Solange II” decision of 1986, “Maastricht” decision of 1993, “Lisbon” decision of 2009, “Honeywell” decision of 2010 and “OMT” decision of 2014 are included in the EU legal literature as landmark decisions regarding the relationship between EU law and national law. The article aims to shed light on the development of case-law of the constitutional court in the context of ultra-vires control and constitutional identity control of EU primary law and to evaluate the relations of other constitutional organs (Federal Assembly and Federal Government) with the EU Court.","PeriodicalId":106262,"journal":{"name":"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Federal German Constitutional Court Jurisprudence and EU Law\",\"authors\":\"Ayşe Füsun Arsava\",\"doi\":\"10.54049/taad.1139315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Federal German Constitutional Court has a leading role in EU Law with its jurisprudence. Solange I” decision of 1974, “Solange II” decision of 1986, “Maastricht” decision of 1993, “Lisbon” decision of 2009, “Honeywell” decision of 2010 and “OMT” decision of 2014 are included in the EU legal literature as landmark decisions regarding the relationship between EU law and national law. The article aims to shed light on the development of case-law of the constitutional court in the context of ultra-vires control and constitutional identity control of EU primary law and to evaluate the relations of other constitutional organs (Federal Assembly and Federal Government) with the EU Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1139315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1139315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国联邦宪法法院以其判例在欧盟法中起着主导作用。1974年的“索兰热一号”决定、1986年的“索兰热二号”决定、1993年的“马斯特里赫特”决定、2009年的“里斯本”决定、2010年的“霍尼韦尔”决定和2014年的“OMT”决定作为欧盟法与国内法关系的里程碑式决定被纳入欧盟法律文献。本文旨在揭示欧盟原始法的越权控制和宪法身份控制背景下宪法法院判例法的发展,并评价其他宪法机构(联邦议会和联邦政府)与欧盟法院的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Federal German Constitutional Court Jurisprudence and EU Law
The Federal German Constitutional Court has a leading role in EU Law with its jurisprudence. Solange I” decision of 1974, “Solange II” decision of 1986, “Maastricht” decision of 1993, “Lisbon” decision of 2009, “Honeywell” decision of 2010 and “OMT” decision of 2014 are included in the EU legal literature as landmark decisions regarding the relationship between EU law and national law. The article aims to shed light on the development of case-law of the constitutional court in the context of ultra-vires control and constitutional identity control of EU primary law and to evaluate the relations of other constitutional organs (Federal Assembly and Federal Government) with the EU Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Legal Situation of Unaccompanied Minors in Turkish Law The Authority of ICSID Tribunals for Suspension of Turkish Criminal Proceedings CEZAYA DEĞER HAKSIZLIĞIN FORMEL TESPİTİNDE PARÇA HAREKET TEORİSİ (TEIL-/ZWISCHENAKTSTHEORIE) VE HUKUKUMUZ BAKIMINDAN UYGULANABİLİRLİĞİ Evaluation of Provisions of Article 15 of the Cadastre Law Titled Partition and Partial Acaustion within the Framework of the Principle ANAYASA MAHKEMESİNİN TMK m. 187’NİN İPTALİNE İLİŞKİN KARARININ ANALİZİ VE DÜZENLEME ÖNERİSİ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1